Not doing Irving especially any favors. Seemed like several times he tried to bounce it outside because of the mass in front of him and ended up losing yards.
Sanford’s play calling IS flecks offense. You can fire Sanford if you want but it’s going to look similar
The passing game is considerably different now than it was in 2019. It's pretty hard to tell if Sanford is the reason for that change or if Fleck changed a bit.
That’s what I’m saying. Sanford is calling Fleck’s offense. So, things will never change even if we get a new OC. Am I wrong?
The offense itself isn’t the problem. The inability to make adjustments of any kind is a huge issue.
I’m also questioning if we’re really running true RPO much anymore. It seems the pass or run is determined ahead of time and Morgan isn’t really making the decision on the fly. Maybe I’m wrong.
That was true under KC too. At least Half the stuff people call “RPO” is called play action.
I think there will be some marginal changes
how about 2017 and 2018 offenses
Once Tanner became the QB in 2018 the offense was decent.
It has absolutely nothing to do with "wideouts not good enough." Stop with this nonsense.
That’s exactly what it was. And for some reason the coaches never realized that an adjusted to a simpler game plan. They thought they could run the slow developing play action routes and get guys open. Wideouts not good enough to get open fast enough. Unless you think they were throwing the game?
The ability to make adjustments and take advantage of situations is like 75% of what an offense does. Not many teams just run the same script of 5-6 plays the whole game
Sure, but a ton more RPO was run under KC.
No chance Fleck is micro-managing this offense. He wouldn't have time between all of the recruiting and personal commitments.
2018 offense was better, and that was only Fleck’s 2nd year. This year is Fleck’s 5th.
Running slow developing deep routes and "not good enough to get separation" are 2 distinct issues, not remotely related.
Thisss!! PJ doesn't care what kind of O or D we are running. If I remember correctly TOP for Purdue game is not good. But he was not complaining as it doesn't fit into his overall philosophy of what an O should be. We just have a horrible OC who haven't earn respect from PJ. It was chummy buddy hire from day 0. I am not sure Simon is the answer. But many of us can agree Sanford is not the answer. It is that simple. Also pls stop BS/snerky saying all these message boards OCs know better than real OCs. Sometimes it doesn't take you to be the one to judge whether that person is doing the job or not. We constantly vote for president without spending a day in oval office. Incumbent election are normally evaluation votes. Hiring or firing vote. Not trying to be a political message. Just want to pointout with simplest example.
