Well they're 9-15 in games not against Penn St, Ohio St, and Michigan. Somehow that translates to competent coaching. Fleck was 17-12 against teams not Penn St, Ohio St, and Michigan in the last 4 years. And then that translates to incompetent coaching apparently. The only logical response to your take is that you consider a coach that wins less more competent.
It's a message board. You stated your opinion, I stated mine. Your whole argument makes little sense.
It is really strange when people make the west vs east argument all the time but conveniently forget the fact the worst two football programs in the conference are Indiana and Rutgers. Indiana is the team fleck has played the least.
Maryland, Indiana, Michigan state, and Rutgers don’t dominate the west. Just because Ohio state, Michigan, and Penn state are better than Wisconsin, Iowa, and Purdue doesn’t mean Rutgers is better than Illinois.
Kind of like just because Georgia is better than Penn state it doesn’t mean Mississippi State is better than Illinois
What is flecks record vs the east?
2 games under .500
Teams played in the East
5 - Maryland (2-3)
3 - Michigan (0-3)
3 - Ohio state (0-3)
3- Michigan state (2-1)
2 - Penn state (1-1)
2 - Indiana (2-0)
2 - Rutgers (2-0)
If you played all 7 teams equally and applied the winning %
Each opponent would be 1/7 - or 2.86 games.
The implied record would be 10.21-9.79
The implied winning % of the east if playing all 7 equally (which will be the case in the new big ten) actually will raise the winning percentage from 45% against the east to 51%
Vs the west?
1 game over .500
51%
The new schedule means fewer games against Michigan, Maryland, Michigan State and Ohio state than we have been playing #shock
The new schedule means more games against Penn State, Rutgers, and Indiana.
.
