http://www.shamasportsheadliners.com/#Eric
(Based on email from Maturi...Shama also discusses Sumlin and Navy coach)
(Based on email from Maturi...Shama also discusses Sumlin and Navy coach)
http://www.shamasportsheadliners.com/#Eric
(Based on email from Maturi...Shama also discusses Sumlin and Navy coach)
Fml.
I'm fully on board with giving people of all races a fair shot at employment, especially since many were disadvantaged for so long, but as highlighted in the article (Tubby, Clem, strong consideration to Strong, many other examples) the U has already proven that it's not a racist institution.
We need to hire the best candidate for the job, not the best minority candidate. If Sumlin (or whomever) is the best candidate, then hire him. But if we find out that Sumlin was hired over, say, Golden because of the color of his skin, I will personally donate money to any cause dedicated to removing Maturi from office forthwith.
if a minority candadate actually gets the job over someone who MUST HAVE BEEN BETTER BECAUSE.....
That's not what I said. Don't put words in my mouth.
The issue is what priority is placed on skin color. If it's further down the list, that's fine. But if priority #1 is skin color, that's wrong. Think of me what you will, but I will never be convinced otherwise.
If it's an HBCU, that's one thing. But last time I checked, the University of Minnesota is not an HBCU.
I don't like this article at a time like this because it will make some people believe that if the U hires a Sumlin or Shannon that it was done in the name of diversity above qualifications.
But you knew darn well before you typed your comment that SKIN COLOR is NOT a TOP Priority and no one believes that it is. Its about opportunity to seriously be considered for the job. Lets not play games
Bottom line, not enough opportunity was given before the Brewster hire
No, I DON'T know that. I am not Joel Maturi or Robert Bruininks. If I am, then I seriously need to talk to HR, because they've been leaving the extra zero off my paychecks.
BS. Strong, a black man, was runner-up. He probably would've had the job if those hiring didn't place so much emphasis on recruiting and rebuilding in-state HS connections. They thought Brewster would be the best at both of those things, which is why he was hired. It had nothing to do with race.
Oh, I see, if a Black guy was considered then we must conclude there was enough opportunity given. Now I see where you are coming from.
"Considered" = "Runner up"?
And no, that is not just semantics. A Strong hire had many advocates, both publicly and otherwise.
I for one welcome our new Afro-Asian lesbian transsexual football coach.
Yeah, yeah, yeah...Plenty of lip service and posturing. And you bought that huh
Given the state of our athletic program, I think we should regard a winner as a diverse hire.
I am fine with that as long as they hire the best coach. Given the state of our athletic program, I think we should regard a winner as a diverse hire.
I for one welcome our new Afro-Asian lesbian transsexual football coach.
Dude, why must you go into hysterics over everything? Take a valium...or 6!
Looks like Shama is about two weeks late on this. Maturi's e-mail seems to be a reply to a "diversity"
question.
Not only will University officials vigorously support that mandate, but also important is the school’s record of hiring for high profile positions in the athletic department during the last 20 years.
The present football staff includes six African-Americans in prominent positions, the most in school history and more than many other BCS programs. Among the six are associate head coach Tim Cross, co-offensive coordinator Thomas Hammock, co-defensive coordinator Ronnie Lee and head strength & conditioning coach Mark Hill.
McKinley Boston, the Gophers athletic director during the early 1990s, is one of the few African-Americans ever to hold the position of athletic director at a Big Ten school. And two of Minnesota’s last three men’s basketball coaches have been African-Americans, Clem Haskins and Tubby Smith.
That should answer anybody except people on either side who want to make it an issue.