PhiloVance
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2021
- Messages
- 2,461
- Reaction score
- 1,556
- Points
- 113
Just look at players coming up from the minors to the majors.Yeah but seriously. Who cares how other people classify mid majors and high majors
Just look at players coming up from the minors to the majors.Yeah but seriously. Who cares how other people classify mid majors and high majors
In baseball?Just look at players coming up from the minors to the majors.
Or NBA G league. Player develops and earns their way up.In baseball?
What does that have to do with the gophersOr NBA G league. Player develops and earns their way up.
Looking at the transfers to the U as having played their way up to a top Div 1 school. I'm not interested if they came from a low or mid major.What does that have to do with the gophers
So you aren’t interested in anyone who isn’t transferring from the ACC, Big Ten, Pac 12, Big 12, or SEC?Looking at the transfers to the U as having played their way up to a top Div 1 school. I'm not interested if they came from a low or mid major.
So you aren’t interested in anyone who isn’t transferring from the ACC, Big Ten, Pac 12, Big 12, or SEC?
do you include the big East as a major? Am I understanding this correctly?
The Gophers are a top Div 1 school?Looking at the transfers to the U as having played their way up to a top Div 1 school. I'm not interested if they came from a low or mid major.
Nailed it! I might add that a mid-major conference typically has one or more teams in the national rankings at some point during the season. Low major conference teams almost never appear in the rankings. Are there exceptions? Of course - Murray State was rated briefly when Ja Morant was working his magic there.To me, it's pretty simple criteria: Do you routinely get more than 1 team in the Tournament? You're a mid-major.
Yeah but seriously. Who cares how other people classify mid majors and high majors
How about saying guys that didnt play in a power 6 conference! Doesnt matter whether they are considered low major or mid major.
Somewhat true but I look at it a little differently - the transfers are aspiring to compete and hopefully succeed at a higher level of competition. IMO it does make a difference where they previously played - it's a more difficult transition to jump from a lower level league where the talent and roster depth is less to an elite P6 league than it is to jump from a mid major to P6 - one could argue that some of the mid major conferences are on a par, or only slightly below, the P6 conferences.Looking at the transfers to the U as having played their way up to a top Div 1 school. I'm not interested if they came from a low or mid major.
This means absolutely nothing as for the gophers are concerned. Just because you are a low major doesnt mean you cant be better than the guy coming to minnesota who is a mid major. This is like saying the 4 star all everything is automatically gonna be better than the 3 star average guy. Who says the 3 star guy cant be better and have a better career and even be all big ten. I guess with a full team of low major transfers your probably right. This team would not be very good. Add in a bunch of other guys including possibly 2 guys from Texas A&M and maybe a couple more D1 transfers along with Gach and Willis and this team might be pretty good.It matters in the sense of how good you might be if you're relying on a bunch of transfers (as the Gophers are).
If Team A recruits a handful of all-conference players from low major conferences and Team B recruits a handful of all-conference players from mid major conferences, in most cases Team B will be better.
The original poster is pointing this out. A team made up of low major transfers has a good chance to not be very good in the Big Ten.
Which would you prefer a 3 star high school player or players, with less than P6 college experience, who had come out of high school were non ranked or 1 to 2 stars?Somewhat true but I look at it a little differently - the transfers are aspiring to compete and hopefully succeed at a higher level of competition. IMO it does make a difference where they previously played - it's a more difficult transition to jump from a lower level league where the talent and roster depth is less to an elite P6 league than it is to jump from a mid major to P6 - one could argue that some of the mid major conferences are on a par, or only slightly below, the P6 conferences.
Every situation is different. But once a kid proves he can play at the college level (even at a lower level) his star ranking no longer matters. So if I am trying to win right away I would lean towards the transfer with college experience over a high school kid.Which would you prefer a 3 star high school player or players, with less than P6 college experience, who had come out of high school were non ranked or 1 to 2 stars?
It should go without saying, for transfers, a player's performance in college should supersede their 'star ranking' coming out of HS.
The level of competition that a player has faced also matters. Some on this thread suggest that the terms 'mid-major' and 'low-major' represent a distinction without a difference. I disagree, but if you want to consider the performance of kids from UNH on a par with kids from Wichita State, so be it. I will continue to see a difference--and I hope you will allow me that.
Finally, star rankings and level of competition are General Categories--and only data points among many to consider when evaluating talent. Each kid has their own unique circumstances--and needs to be evaluated individually!
Agreed. I think most of us can agree that the whole transfer portal situation is a crapshoot. A recent example close to home is our recruitment of transfer athletes form Milwaukee (Horizon League = low major). Akeem Springs was a key addition to the Gophers roster while Brock Stull, who followed 2 years later, was a non-factor. Their stats while playing for Milwaukee were fairly comparable with a slight edge to Stull but the results when playing for the Gophers are markedly different. Without stats to back it up, I would guess that the Stull outcome is more common when moving up from low major to P6. By contrast I was much more confident that Robbins would be an impact player due in large part to the conference he was coming from (MVC, a true mid-major). Bottom Line: I'm hoping more for a Springs-like transition than a Stull-like transition from our low-major transfers.The level of competition that a player has faced also matters. Some on this thread suggest that the terms 'mid-major' and 'low-major' represent a distinction without a difference. I disagree, but if you want to consider the performance of kids from UNH on a par with kids from Wichita State, so be it. I will continue to see a difference--and I hope you will allow me that.
This means absolutely nothing as for the gophers are concerned.
I guess with a full team of low major transfers your probably right. This team would not be very good.
Without stats to back it up, I would guess that the Stull outcome is more common when moving up from low major to P6.
Am I counting wrong? I thought out of 12 spots on roster we have 3 low majors right now.It absolutely matters, as the Gophers have mostly low major transfers at this point.
Exactly. Right now, this team is mostly full of low major transfers.
Hopefully it changes before Opening Night in November. Obviously, it will change, as we have several scholarships yet to fill. It is five spots open???
Am I counting wrong? I thought out of 12 spots on roster we have 3 low majors right now.
I have: Loewe, William & Mary; Stephens, Lafayette and Sutherlin, UNH, clearly 3 Low-Majors.
Also Gach, Utah (if you want to count him) and Battle, George Washington, 2 Mid-majors
Fox from Northern... D2!
Ihnen and Thompson (incoming), UM orignal recruits.
And Willis is coming in from the College of Charleston, a low major--although he has played for us and Vanderbilt. Categorize him as you wish.
So, by my count, that is a minimum of 3 LM and 1 D2. Plus you can decide about Willis...
Total of 9; hope for the two from A&M would make 11--leaving 2 spots open.
Not that it changes what you are saying, but Gach came from a team playing in the Pac-12, which is one of the Power 6 conferences.I have: Loewe, William & Mary; Stephens, Lafayette and Sutherlin, UNH, clearly 3 Low-Majors.
Also Gach, Utah (if you want to count him) and Battle, George Washington, 2 Mid-majors
Fox from Northern... D2!
Ihnen and Thompson (incoming), UM orignal recruits.
And Willis is coming in from the College of Charleston, a low major--although he has played for us and Vanderbilt. Categorize him as you wish.
So, by my count, that is a minimum of 3 LM and 1 D2. Plus you can decide about Willis...
Total of 9; hope for the two from A&M would make 11--leaving 2 spots open.
Yep, guilty as chargedWell, do you understand that by admitting you don't have empirical evidence, your guess isn't worth anything?