Stoodabaker
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 88
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
Every game we start the game slow and sluggish while digging ourselves a huge hole. We have 4 defensive players and only one guy who can create his own shot.
I hate our starting lineup!
- Thread starter Stoodabaker
- Start date
WilliamsArenaGuy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 3,801
- Reaction score
- 1,887
- Points
- 113
I have thought the same thing all year. I don't get it.
I also don't get how the only guy who any sort of spark at all (Paul Carter) sat out while we gave up about 100 points in a row.
I also don't get how the only guy who any sort of spark at all (Paul Carter) sat out while we gave up about 100 points in a row.
why oh why start the two freshman biggies?
Somebody explain why Iverson and Sampson always start?
Against an athletic team like Michigan State:
They cannot play defense against such quick players;
they are not quick or strong enough to get the ball in good position;
when they do get the ball they can't do anything;
they can't get back fast enough to help out on the fastbreak;
other than that they do a good job.
They are effective against certain team, like Illinois who don't have the real athletic big men. But you watch, against Ohio State it's going to be more of the same if they start.
Somebody explain the logic in starting them to me, I guess I'm just not smart enough to figure it out!
Somebody explain why Iverson and Sampson always start?
Against an athletic team like Michigan State:
They cannot play defense against such quick players;
they are not quick or strong enough to get the ball in good position;
when they do get the ball they can't do anything;
they can't get back fast enough to help out on the fastbreak;
other than that they do a good job.
They are effective against certain team, like Illinois who don't have the real athletic big men. But you watch, against Ohio State it's going to be more of the same if they start.
Somebody explain the logic in starting them to me, I guess I'm just not smart enough to figure it out!
why, why, why
Somebody explain why Iverson and Sampson always start?
Against an athletic team like Michigan State:
They cannot play defense against such quick players;
they are not quick or strong enough to get the ball in good position;
when they do get the ball they can't do anything;
they can't get back fast enough to help out on the fastbreak;
other than that they do a good job.
They are effective against certain team, like Illinois who don't have the real athletic big men. But you watch, against Ohio State it's going to be more of the same if they start.
Somebody explain the logic in starting them to me, I guess I'm just not smart enough to figure it out!
Somebody explain why Iverson and Sampson always start?
Against an athletic team like Michigan State:
They cannot play defense against such quick players;
they are not quick or strong enough to get the ball in good position;
when they do get the ball they can't do anything;
they can't get back fast enough to help out on the fastbreak;
other than that they do a good job.
They are effective against certain team, like Illinois who don't have the real athletic big men. But you watch, against Ohio State it's going to be more of the same if they start.
Somebody explain the logic in starting them to me, I guess I'm just not smart enough to figure it out!