ESPN: Ranking all 131 college football quarterback situations in tiers (Tier 9: Veterans with moxie; seven players, six jobs: PSU, Okla St, Minnesota)

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
60,774
Reaction score
16,183
Points
113
per ESPN:

Tier 9: Veterans with moxie (seven players, six jobs)

Penn State's Sean Clifford
Stanford's Tanner McKee
Minnesota's Tanner Morgan
Oklahoma State's Spencer Sanders
Florida State's Jordan Travis
Oregon State's Chance Nolan and Tristan Gebbia


Call them game managers if you must. Their stats -- and often simply watching them run an offense -- would support the theory. But last year's list of "game managers" might've also included guys like Hartman, Armstrong, Bennett and Hooker, and those players all blossomed into stars. Perhaps there are one or two breakout candidates, too.

Clifford played in 12 full games last year. His six best performances were excellent (67% completions, 16 TDs and three picks). In his six worst, not so much (57% completions, five touchdowns and five picks). ... Sanders in two games vs. Baylor last season: one touchdown, seven interceptions. Sanders in his other 11 games: 25 TDs and five picks. ... Over the past two seasons, the Seminoles have averaged 6.5 yards per play with Travis on the field and 4.5 when he's off it. ... In Morgan's first 21 games at Minnesota, he threw for 39 touchdowns with 13 picks and averaged 9.9 yards per pass. In the 20 games since, he has thrown 17 TDs with 14 picks and averaged 7.9 yards per pass. ... McKee's first five starts showed serious promise (65% completions, 7.2 yards/attempt, 11 TDs, 0 INTs, 7 sacks, 80.3 TQBR), and his final five (with an injury mixed in) suggested Stanford's offense might be hopeless (5.8 yd/att, 4 TDs, 7 INTs, 17 sacks, 47.4 TQBR). In seven wins, Nolan threw 14 TDs and three picks with a 174 passer rating. In six losses, he had five TDs, seven interceptions and a 127 passer rating. Nolan only got the starting job when Gebbia went down with injury, and Beavers coach Jonathan Smith insists starting reps are still up for grabs.


Go Gophers!!
 

It's interesting to see the change over the years in how QB play is evaluated. If you go back to the 60's and 70's, QB's threw a lot more INT's.

For whatever reason, INT's were not considered to be a big deal. And completion % was also a lot lower.

that suggests to me that QB's were willing to throw more high-risk passes and take chances.

then, as time went by, things changed. QB's were expected to have a higher completion % and throw fewer interceptions.

I'm not saying either approach is "right" or "wrong."

just saying that there certainly has been in shift in my lifetime as a sports fan.
 




Top Bottom