kuhlmanalex
Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2010
- Messages
- 56
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
First of all, I am not saying that Gray is better than or equal to Robinson, I just wanted to put it into perspective to those that are asking to yank Gray....still (which is baffling and I half think is just a bit to get people going)
Robinson 27-55 49% (including a 7-18 vs a mighty Eastern Mich defense today) for 531 yards. 6 TD and 4 INT.
50 carries for 352 yards and 2 TD's
Gray 34-65 52.3% for 468 yards. 3 TD and 2 INT
58 carries for 328 yards
and just for the heck of it here is:
Shortell 9-22 40.9% for 125 yards. 1 TD and 1 INT.
3 carries for 32 yards
So, even though Gray has sat I think approximately a half or so he has only 87 less total yards than Denard Robinson...I wonder if they are calling for Denard to get benched there.
I understand that stats don't show everything but many of you are so sold on the fact that Shortell is such a better passer yet he is only completing 40.9% of his passes. Granted its a small sample size and he has had drops, but every quarterback has drops built into his completion percentage. The other thing is that this isn't the NFL, so stop with the Gray will be a WR in the pros...cool, let him be one in the pros if he gets there.
Running ability is a huge factor in determining how good a college quarterback is and I just find it comical how people discount it and think that only passing stats matter. Do you think Auburn wins it last year without Cam running? Or Oregon is as good without the rushing ability of their quarterback? You don't need to be Andrew Luck to be a successful quarterback in college...and I think that for Kills system the running ability of the quarterback is even more important. Just my two cents worth on trying to convince people that quarterback is the last position on this team that we need to worry about...far behing: OLine, Running Back, Secondary, Pass Rush, etc...
Robinson 27-55 49% (including a 7-18 vs a mighty Eastern Mich defense today) for 531 yards. 6 TD and 4 INT.
50 carries for 352 yards and 2 TD's
Gray 34-65 52.3% for 468 yards. 3 TD and 2 INT
58 carries for 328 yards
and just for the heck of it here is:
Shortell 9-22 40.9% for 125 yards. 1 TD and 1 INT.
3 carries for 32 yards
So, even though Gray has sat I think approximately a half or so he has only 87 less total yards than Denard Robinson...I wonder if they are calling for Denard to get benched there.
I understand that stats don't show everything but many of you are so sold on the fact that Shortell is such a better passer yet he is only completing 40.9% of his passes. Granted its a small sample size and he has had drops, but every quarterback has drops built into his completion percentage. The other thing is that this isn't the NFL, so stop with the Gray will be a WR in the pros...cool, let him be one in the pros if he gets there.
Running ability is a huge factor in determining how good a college quarterback is and I just find it comical how people discount it and think that only passing stats matter. Do you think Auburn wins it last year without Cam running? Or Oregon is as good without the rushing ability of their quarterback? You don't need to be Andrew Luck to be a successful quarterback in college...and I think that for Kills system the running ability of the quarterback is even more important. Just my two cents worth on trying to convince people that quarterback is the last position on this team that we need to worry about...far behing: OLine, Running Back, Secondary, Pass Rush, etc...