- Apr 30, 2009
- Reaction score
How can you be so sure? Who says so? This hasn't been investigated. We wouldn't be here today if it was because Zelensky would respond to the Trump phone call by saying, YES, we've already looked into it, we'll send you the report.The only person who says he was investigating Burisma at the time he was fired was Shokin. Everyone else with knowledge of it says he wasn't. And again, it would be very weird if the ONLY corruption investigation he was undertaking was into Burisma.
As for the bolded, there's a lot of evidence that this is what Parnas, Giuliani, and Fruman did. A lot.
We also don't know that this was the only corruption he was investigating. But it doesn't matter. Would you or would you not agree: Biden should not get a prosecutor fired who was investigating his sons company, even if that prosecutor is dirty.
Yeah, and there's a mountain of evidence that the Dems decided to impeach the president for sniffing around, so that defensiveness speaks volumes. The way you've framed it, they should welcome an investigation into Burisma, it's going to show Rudy and Trump as the bad guys.