U cuts men's tennis, gymnastics and track and field

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
51,514
Reaction score
1,628
Points
113
From the U:


An Open Letter to the University of Minnesota Athletics Community

We are writing to you today with difficult news.

For years, Gopher Athletics has operated like most Minnesotans – by humbly doing more with less. Minnesota has diligently sponsored 25 varsity sports, which is the fourth-most in the Big Ten Conference, on a budget that is only the eighth largest. Despite this imbalance, we have taken great pride in offering and excelling in a broad-based athletic department, one that has claimed 76 regular-season conference titles in 20 different sports since 2000.

For the past few years, we had forecasted future sustainability issues, both financial and Title IX related, and although we have directed our efforts to address these challenges while maintaining our current sport offerings, we knew we would be faced with a difficult sports sponsorship decision at some point.

The COVID-19 pandemic and the Big Ten’s decision to postpone fall 2020-21 sports has greatly increased the financial concerns. Our athletic department is now facing a projected loss of revenue of approximately $75 million just this fiscal year. This is a significant deficit and one that will have an impact for years to come. At the same time, we remain steadfast in our commitment to provide Title IX gender-equitable participation opportunities that are closely aligned with our male and female undergraduate enrollment percentages. We are mindful that our sport programs have worked to adjust their participation opportunities to keep pace with our growing female undergraduate population percentages.

As a result, we have determined that Athletics is no longer able to financially or equitably sustain 25 varsity programs, and pending approval of the Board of Regents, we will discontinue men’s indoor track and field, men’s outdoor track and field, men’s gymnastics and men’s tennis at the completion of their 2020-21 competition season. Should health and safety precautions allow, these teams will have the opportunity to compete during the 2020-21 season.

Our goal for the last few years was to create a nimble athletic department, one that was self-sufficient, competed at the highest level and provided a first-class experience for our student-athletes. We experienced record-level fundraising during the last several years and reduced our operating budgets during both FY19 and FY20. When COVID-19 struck, we adjusted and members of our executive team and several head coaches volunteered for two separate pay reductions. We previously reduced $5 million from our FY21 budget and implemented hiring and spending freezes. Despite these financial efforts, we can still no longer sustain 25 programs.

In addition to the financial challenges and gender-equity commitments, we also considered community impact, local and national interest, competitiveness, and sport sponsorship at the Big Ten and NCAA Division I level when making this decision.

We understand that this is devastating news for impacted student-athletes, coaches and staff. We also recognize the ripple effect this decision will have on all of our student-athletes and on former letterwinners, alumni, donors, family, friends and fans who have participated on and cheered for these four programs over the years. We did not make this decision lightly.

Members of the impacted teams will continue to have access to athletic, academic and mental health support throughout their 2020-21 competition season. We will also continue to honor all existing scholarships for individuals who choose to complete their undergraduate degree at Minnesota, while still offering them access to academic advising, sports psychology and necessary access to athletic medicine. We will also assist any student-athlete who decides to transfer and will support them through the transition process.

We have been honest with our student-athletes, staff and campus leadership about the severe financial ramifications our department is facing. We are also aware that this decision directly impacts lives and the livelihoods of many, while forever changing the landscape of Gopher Athletics.

Personnel Cost-Reduction Plan

In addition to adjusting our sport offerings, we are also announcing a personnel cost-reduction plan for Athletics. This is in addition to the University’s previously implemented furlough and pay-reduction plan, which members of the athletic department already participated in. Most academic professional and administrative employees will be subject to a 10 percent reduction in appointment, while civil service and labor represented employees will be furloughed for 17 days. These impacts will continue for the remainder of the fiscal year. Employees who make $40,000 or less will not be impacted.

The athletic department is also eliminating eight positions in addition to those that will be eliminated because of program discontinuation. The department anticipates a savings of $1.3 million this fiscal year related to its personnel cost-reduction plan.

It was previously announced that Director of Athletics Mark Coyle and head coaches P.J. Fleck, Hugh McCutcheon, Bob Motzko, Richard Pitino and Lindsay Whalen volunteered for a 10 percent salary reduction. That reduction will now be extended through the entire fiscal year and will result in a savings of an additional $1.2 million.

In short, we have tried to find a way to avoid these difficult decisions. Unfortunately, we could not overcome the challenges presented by these unprecedented times.

We fully understand that these decisions will have a significant impact on our student-athletes and employees, especially those who are directly affected. We will continue to explore ways to mitigate our deficit and will continue to support our remaining student-athletes and staff.

Sincerely,

Joan T.A. Gabel, President

Mark Coyle, Director of Athletics

Minnesota Athletics Program Discontinuation Frequently Asked Questions

What decisions were announced today?


Today, we announced the difficult decision to discontinue our men’s indoor track and field, men’s outdoor track and field, men’s gymnastics and men’s tennis programs at the conclusion of their 2020-21 competition season. The four impacted teams will have the opportunity to compete during their 2020-21 competition season provided health and safety circumstances allow. We also announced a personnel cost-reduction plan that starts in October and continues through the fiscal year. These actions are pending Board of Regents approval.

What was the process that led to the decision to discontinue these programs?

We continuously review our program from a financial standpoint as well as a gender-equity standpoint. Our ongoing fiscal challenges have been magnified by the COVID-19 pandemic and the Big Ten’s decision to postpone the fall 2020-21 season. Our athletic department is now facing a projected loss of revenue of approximately $75 million just this fiscal year. This is a significant loss and one that will impact our athletic department for years.

In order to address the initial financial impact of the pandemic, Athletic Director Mark Coyle and the department’s five-highest earning coaches volunteered to take two sets of pay reductions. In addition, other head coaches and senior administration members have taken pay reductions as well. Athletics also implemented a hiring and spending freeze and eligible staff members participated in the University’s furlough and pay-reduction plan. Athletics is projected to save an additional $1.3 million through its proposed personnel cost-reduction plan. These cost-containment measures are in addition to Athletics-implemented budget reductions implemented since FY19, with approximately $5 million dollars of cost saving adjustments in FY21 alone.

Why were these four sports chosen for discontinuation?

Once we determined that we simply are no longer able to sustain 25 sports financially, we reviewed our overall sport offering with an eye toward a sports sponsorship model that would provide sustainable, competitive and equitable participation opportunities for our remaining programs. Due to recent shifts in our female and male undergraduate demographics, we also needed to take steps to ensure compliance with our commitment to provide gender-equitable participation opportunities for our students consistent with federal law requirements. We also considered community impact, local and national interest, competitiveness, and sport sponsorship at the Big Ten and NCAA Division I level.

Why is this being announced now?

We are announcing now due to the impact of COVID 19. While there is never a good time to announce sport eliminations, we wanted to announce the decision as soon as it was made and with time to allow our student-athletes to fully explore their academic and athletic options.

Is there any sort of fundraising effort to save these sports?

We have tremendous donors who are extremely generous and, as a department, we have experienced record-level fundraising during the past several years. However, as this decision is a combination of financial sustainability and Title IX commitment, we do not believe there is a realistic fundraising goal we could set that would address all the challenges that led to this decision.

What does this decision say about the stability of Minnesota athletics?

For years, Minnesota has been one of the most resourceful athletic departments in the country. Twenty different Gopher teams have won a combined 76 conference titles since 2000. We are also continually ranked as one of the highest academically achieving public schools in the nation with regard to Academic Progress Report (APR) and Graduation Success Rate (GSR) and have led the Big Ten for the last five years in the number of Academic All-Americans. We do things the right way and are making decisions that we believe are necessary for our department as we move forward.

Will you honor existing athletics scholarships for those student-athletes affected?

Yes, we will honor all existing scholarships for individuals who choose to complete their undergraduate degree at Minnesota.

What is the impact of these changes on gender equity and Title IX?

The decision to eliminate four men’s sports, combined with roster adjustments in women’s programs, will result in female and male participation numbers that closely align with our undergraduate campus enrollment percentages, which is approximately 54% female and 46% male. By having our program offerings mirror our changing student population, the University will be ensuring that we are providing full, effective, and equitable participation opportunities for our female and male student-athletes.

How many student-athletes are affected by the decision to discontinue four programs?

This decision impacts 58 student-athletes.

How does the discontinuation of four sports impact diversity within the athletic department?

Our University and athletic department are committed to diversity, equity and inclusion. The elimination of these four programs does not change that commitment. The athletic department’s goal of diversity and inclusion is to foster an environment in which all members of the Athletics community are treated equitably, contribute fully to the athletic departments mission, and embrace and model the department’s values.

How will the affected student-athletes be supported?

We will continue to provide the student-athletes of these four programs with athletic, academic and mental health support throughout their 2020-21 competition season. We will also honor all existing athletics scholarships for those affected student-athletes who choose to complete their undergraduate degree at Minnesota, while still providing them with access to academic advising, sports psychology and athletics-related sports medicine services. Should a student-athlete decide to transfer, we will support them through the transition process and will grant them their full release from the University.

What will happen if competition resumes (with appropriate health and safety conditions) and if one of the teams is unable to field a roster for the upcoming season as a result of today’s decision?

The 2020-21 competition season will be the final opportunity for these four programs to compete at the varsity level. We will continue to honor student-athlete scholarships and will work with coaches if a program is unable to compete during 2020-21.

How much money will be saved as a result of the program discontinuation?

We anticipate a savings of $2 million in FY22 and an annual savings of $2.7 million once all student-athletes currently on athletics-based aid have graduated.

How would potential savings be used in the future?

Financial savings will help the department balance its budget.

How much money will be saved in FY21 as a result of the personnel cost-reduction plan?

We anticipate a savings of $1.3 million this fiscal year.

Go Gophers!!
 

Nokomis

Nothing To Say
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
4,864
Reaction score
472
Points
83
Seems reasonable at first glance, but my question is if it's worth it. The financial report I found on GopherSports shows total AD expenses of just under $130 million. Cutting these four sports saves just $2.7 million. Is cutting four sports worth it for just shaving 2% off the annual budget?
 

nitramnaed

Active member
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
232
Reaction score
109
Points
43
Seems reasonable at first glance, but my question is if it's worth it. The financial report I found on GopherSports shows total AD expenses of just under $130 million. Cutting these four sports saves just $2.7 million. Is cutting four sports worth it for just shaving 2% off the annual budget?
Agreed. Seems like a drop in the ocean. Maybe a few more percentage points off salaries would almost make up for it.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
46,769
Reaction score
4,482
Points
113
Seems reasonable at first glance, but my question is if it's worth it. The financial report I found on GopherSports shows total AD expenses of just under $130 million. Cutting these four sports saves just $2.7 million. Is cutting four sports worth it for just shaving 2% off the annual budget?
Is that for this year or ongoing? I don't think this is the last of the cuts, sadly.
 

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
51,514
Reaction score
1,628
Points
113
The thing is, the U still has women's sports of these three so the U still has to maintain the facilities for each. If they had cut women's as well, and repurposed the facilities (and sold the tennis facility to a private owner) then it would make more sense.

Sad day.

Go Gophers!!
 

2nd Degree Gopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
1,106
Reaction score
157
Points
63
Is that for this year or ongoing? I don't think this is the last of the cuts, sadly.
I read it as $2M in savings in the 2021 fiscal year and then $2.7M annually once all of the current student-athletes have left the program. No projected savings this year since they may still compete if there is competition and reduced savings for a year or two or three after that as they will still have the scholarship and other support expense for any of the affected athletes who elect to remain at the U on scholarship rather than transfer.
 

bonin21

Active member
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
756
Reaction score
133
Points
43
If they had cut women's as well, and repurposed the facilities (and sold the tennis facility to a private owner) then it would make more sense.
Good idea. The tennis facility is also in a good location to create some more world class facilities for the football/basketball/hockey teams.

Those teams being competitive makes a huge bottom line difference.
 

HopHead

rank lieutenant
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
37
Points
48
Ugh. This sucks. So they are cutting track and field but not cross country? Good luck recruiting runners to run a single season when they can go anywhere else and compete year round.
 

2nd Degree Gopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
1,106
Reaction score
157
Points
63
The thing is, the U still has women's sports of these three so the U still has to maintain the facilities for each. If they had cut women's as well, and repurposed the facilities (and sold the tennis facility to a private owner) then it would make more sense.

Sad day.

Go Gophers!!
Agree that it's a sad day, but probably one that was inevitable. I don't know that the U was issuing the maximum allowable scholarships in these sports, but if they were out of whack on Title IX compliance, then cutting women's sports would not help solve their problem. For example, cutting men's tennis includes cutting 4.5 scholarships while cutting women's tennis would include cutting 8. For gymnastics, the numbers are 6.3 and 12 and for track and field they are 12.6 and 18 (although I think these numbers also include cross-country). Cutting the sports in tandem actually exacerbates the Title IX problem. Just a guess, but I am thinking this will result in a reduction of 15-20 men's scholarships when all is said and done and that was a way to get into Title IX compliance.
 

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
51,514
Reaction score
1,628
Points
113
Agree that it's a sad day, but probably one that was inevitable. I don't know that the U was issuing the maximum allowable scholarships in these sports, but if they were out of whack on Title IX compliance, then cutting women's sports would not help solve their problem. For example, cutting men's tennis includes cutting 4.5 scholarships while cutting women's tennis would include cutting 8. For gymnastics, the numbers are 6.3 and 12 and for track and field they are 12.6 and 18 (although I think these numbers also include cross-country). Cutting the sports in tandem actually exacerbates the Title IX problem. Just a guess, but I am thinking this will result in a reduction of 15-20 men's scholarships when all is said and done and that was a way to get into Title IX compliance.
Was the U out of compliance on Title IX before this? I had never heard that.

Go Gophers!!
 

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
51,514
Reaction score
1,628
Points
113
Sadly I have been in the room when the AD came into cut a sport. I was merely a walk-on tennis player at KU when the AD called a mandatory meeting and cut men's tennis (and men's golf and men's/women's swimming). There were a lot of tears, anger and shock. Many lives impacted. Most fans look at the big revenue sports (and for good reason) but for athletes and coaches/staff of these sports, it really sucks.

Go Gophers!!
 

A_Slab_of_Bacon

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 21, 2015
Messages
15,039
Reaction score
2,097
Points
113
That's rough stuff :(


I give Heating Coyles credit for being the face of things here like he should.
 

MplsGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
16,359
Reaction score
2,731
Points
113
Why wouldn’t you cut men’s cross-country, then? What nationally competitive distance runner is going to come here just to race XC in the fall, but with no track program to compete on in the winter and spring?

Also, why spare men’s golf and swimming? Why do they add enough value to keep, while the others didn’t?
 

Tommyboy

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
150
Reaction score
14
Points
18
I do not get it, 130 million dollar budget and they cut all the sports that have high end students that contribute to the University for 2 million? The students from these sports on the most part are excellent, clean cut students. Cut these salaries of these over priced coaches and allow these students to participate. Last year SCSU cut their football team and most of these kids left.
 

2nd Degree Gopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
1,106
Reaction score
157
Points
63
Why wouldn’t you cut men’s cross-country, then? What nationally competitive distance runner is going to come here just to race XC in the fall, but with no track program to compete on in the winter and spring?
Good question. Maybe they think that they can draw top notch runners with more generous scholarship offers than programs with full track teams can provide?

Also, why spare men’s golf and swimming? Why do they add enough value to keep, while the others didn’t?
When they tried to cut golf before there was a fundraising effort to save it. That might have made cutting golf less necessary and/or less palatable. The other sports don't offer enough monetary value to keep, but they want to keep offering as many sports as possible. If they were just going to eliminate all of the non-revenue sports, golf and swim/dive would be gone, too.
 

Nokomis

Nothing To Say
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
4,864
Reaction score
472
Points
83
So this affects 58 male athletes. Football alone has 85 on scholarship, right? Not saying that's good or bad, and I obviously love Gopher football, but it shows how dominant football is to the budget and Title IX.
 

BilldGopher

Section 211
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
2,771
Reaction score
319
Points
83
Who's next?

Men's Sports remaining:
Baseball; Basketball; Cross Country; Football; Golf; Hockey; Swim & Dive; Wrestling

Women's Sports:
Basketball; Cross Country; Golf; Gymnastics; Hockey; Rowing; Soccer; Softball; Swim & Dive; Tennis; Track & Field; Volleyball

Not progress but unavoidable.
 

Nokomis

Nothing To Say
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
4,864
Reaction score
472
Points
83
Where's J Robinson when you need him?

(Joking of course)
 

fmlizard

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2012
Messages
2,288
Reaction score
648
Points
113
I really don't like how Title IX is applied. I don't disagree with the legislation or its intent, but I do hate how it forces schools to take from one group (men). Why not raise women up and leave men as they are, rather than forced cuts that hurt men and don't help women?

My suspicion, as it was when Iowa did similar things, is that this is something they kinda sorta wanted to do anyway, and this gives cover to do it. It was mostly Title IX. If they wanted to save these programs badly enough they would have.
 

Plato

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
576
Reaction score
345
Points
63
These young men and women are collateral damage from a lost war against a pandemic virus that has disrupted our society as bad as WW2 did.
 
Top Bottom