- Feb 20, 2010
- Reaction score
Again, you don't have to read the article, but then don't make claims about what's not in the article.I’ve heard media analysts say, after reading the article, that there is no claim of illegality. You‘re free to post any claims or proof otherwise. Your last post made one vague accusation. About as good as a howie claim.
Like I said, we've moved from "there are no claims of illegality" to "there's no proof of illegality."
I've posted 3:
A) Trump wrote off legal expenses that were used to help his campaign. https://www.forums.gopherhole.com/boards/threads/trumps-taxes.98193/page-14#post-2051893
B) Trump paid Ivanka as a consultant and wrote it off when the whole time she was working as an executive of the company. https://www.forums.gopherhole.com/boards/threads/trumps-taxes.98193/#post-2050897
C) Trump claimed Seven Springs as an investment property when instead it is a private residence. https://www.forums.gopherhole.com/boards/threads/trumps-taxes.98193/page-7#post-2051267
D) There's also this one:
E) This is to say nothing of the long section on items that could easily be described as bribes, but can most charitably described as conflicts of interest.