Actually have watched the show a knew who he was way before the show. There are more kids and families that steer clear of his ilk than pay attention. He is interested in players that can make him money, that is a small number of players. I have been a critic of Richard Pitino but cheating is not one of them. Do you even know of what players already get above board ? I am fine with abolishing the whole thing. Only let athletes into school that actually qualify, no scholarships outside of academics, no athletic track . Or go all out and pay them but it will not be the schools. Even after they get their share from the NCAA there are few that make money, VERY FEW. If you allow outside money than the programs that cheat now will be the same ones. Your way out of touch if you think there are not clean coaches and programs. I have worked within several over the years and they fly clean 100 %. There are coaches that cheat and there are coaches that do not. Just like there are people that cheat on taxes and those that do not. Dawkins measures success by money. That is fine for him. Most people with real money and millions without measure success in far different ways. He did not even mention the kids that he never paid, the kids he cost their elgibility. The broken promises to parents and uncles. The blatant bias told one side in crude language without critical thinking .Also, why is Dawkins scum? You haven't watched the show and know nothing about his life or who he is.
He's the opposite of scum. He wants to help poor kids and poor families in poor communities, like the one he grew up in.
It's not illegal to give someone money, in the hopes that they'll pick you later on to represent them if they decide to turn pro. It's against NCAA rules, yes. But so what?? Who gives a crap what the NCAA says and thinks??
Amatuerism was made up, from the very beginning. The concept was conjured out of thin air, in England a hundred years ago, so that rich kids wouldn't have to compete in sports against poor factory workers. End of story. There isn't a single fiber of morality that supports the notion as superior.