- Aug 18, 2013
- Reaction score
I’ve never said it was a lab leak. I’d be more inclined to believe the zoonotic explanation (which is very plausible) if China were cooperative. You’re still not understanding my arguments, after multiple pages?None of this proves in the slightest that the WIV was conducting GoF research on coronaviruses. You're just saying that they shouldn't do that. OK, they probably shouldn't. Were they? No evidence.
People shouldn't drink and drive. It's not a good idea. And?
I did watch this from 29:30 onward, for a few minutes to get the idea.
He only talks about "spillover", which is meant to say that villiagers living near bats need to be careful about how they interact with them, to help reduce the risk of pandemics from coronaviruses. And that he thinks there are constantly "spillover" occasions that don't result in pandemics.
I don't see how this supports your ideas, at all. If anything, it supports the idea that Sars2 did not come from lab experiments. If there were parts earlier in the video that you think do support your ideas, then you should tell me which parts.
You had to resort to linking the "fact" sheet from the Georgian embassey because it's no longer hosted on any kind of regular US state dept website. No need to be dishonest about that.
Well and good.
Proves that Sars2 was created and accidentally released from WIV? No.
But you believe and want that to be the origin. I have no Earthly idea why. But you seem to be pretty well indoctrinated on that. Maybe not the level of a fanatic, yet.