THE BIG TEN SUCKS (For Hockey)!!!!

bleedsmaroonandgold

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
5,772
Reaction score
54
Points
48
In the 2018 tournament, 4 of 7 B1G teams were tourney teams and the B1G made up 3 of the 4 Frozen Four. We are a small conference, but having more than half your teams being tournament caliber and 3 Frozen Four teams is a mark of strength and depth. The problem hasn't been the weakness of the B1G, it's been the weakness of the Gophers.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
81
Reaction score
30
Points
18
Agreed. It’s not the quality or that the Gophers are down. Even when the Gophers won four straight conference titles it was a snoozer. The regional competition was more fun. A road trip to Duluth or St Cloud (and vice versa) was doable. Your neighbor could be your friend and enemy at the same time. Combine the lack of interest in the competition and the forced seat donation together and you have a arena that can feel like a morgue.
 

bonin21

Active member
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
685
Reaction score
92
Points
28
Big Ten and holding onto Lucia for multiple years too many killed Gopher hockey.
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
7,934
Reaction score
447
Points
83
I checked into tickets. For a blue line ticket the Gophers are asking $70 per. Let me just say h3ll no to that one. The kids are D1, but they are still amateur's. Anything over $20 is too much, especially when so few butts are in the seats.
 

BTChamp

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
1,054
Reaction score
552
Points
113
One of the main reasons I liked college hockey was the WCHA and its uniqueness. Now it just seems like business, not an amateur sport. Enjoyed seeing universities that have little or nothing else like the Alaska and Colorado schools. It was something different from the typical major sports around the country.
 

KillmeNow

Banned
Joined
Sep 18, 2015
Messages
1,450
Reaction score
104
Points
63
One of the main reasons I liked college hockey was the WCHA and its uniqueness. Now it just seems like business, not an amateur sport. Enjoyed seeing universities that have little or nothing else like the Alaska and Colorado schools. It was something different from the typical major sports around the country.
Yeah, as fans, that's understandable. But college sports DO COST money. I read once that the U spends a million dollars A YEAR on hockey sticks alone. Maybe my memory is off, that might have been more than one year? But my point is the same, there are expenses to having athletic programs. Very few college hockey programs make money. For the short term, the move to the B1G definitely hurt the Gophers, may have hurt Wisconsin and maybe even Michigan, but it didn't hurt SCSU or Mankato or UMD, UND, Denver, WMU, Omaha or Bemidji St, much less Penn St, Ohio St, Notre Dame or Arizona St. And NMU and BG also have a better chance of getting into the tourney now, but only if they deserve it. The wealth of the WCHA was spread out among 3 different conferences, although the CCHA was lost, so in the end college hockey basically expanded by one good conference, and 2 big schools(PSU & ASU) and if this Illinois thing happens, then it will be 3 big schools and I've heard Illinois is only the 1st of 6 programs earmarked for getting help from the NHL to make the jump to Div 1. This has improved the quality of the teams making it into the NCAA tourney. Long term I could see the NCAA tourney expanding to 18 and then 20 teams, and long term I can see TV money coming into play which will help smaller schools to make the jump up to Div 1 or bigger schools to just start up programs from scratch. College hockey was a niche sport, and sure, we as fans loved it the way it was, but the long term health of college hockey needed it to expand and grow and change. Hopefully ten years from now, after the B1G has won a couple Natl Titles, and hopefully by beating fellow B1G teams in the Frozen Four if not in the Title game, which will add fuel to the fires of the rivalries that will eventually develop over time. I heard the cost of tickets to hockey games are dropping next season, and we all expect the team to be much improved, so maybe next year is the beginning of a new era of Gopher hockey dominance and of the B1G kicking tail in the NCAA tourney as well?
 

Veritas

Banned
Joined
Nov 5, 2019
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
573
Points
113
What is this thread for other than to have a nice whine? Are we suppose to give up the $54 million per year every year from the Big Ten TV contract? For what, a (maybe) $3 million dollar local contract? This is all too silly. The University of Minnesota plays in the Big Ten as a founding member of THE most successful conference in the US. How many hundreds of college sports programs would love to take our place?
 
Last edited:

bonin21

Active member
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
685
Reaction score
92
Points
28
NCHC: Four straight titles

"Most successful conference"

Lmao
 

#2Gopher

Well-known member
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
5,545
Reaction score
471
Points
83
What is this thread for other than to have a nice whine? Are we suppose to give up the $54 million per year every year from the Big Ten TV contract? For what, a (maybe) $3 million dollar local contract? This is all too silly. The University of Minnesota plays in the Big Ten as a founding member of THE most successful conference in the US. How many hundreds of college sports programs love to take our place?
Money talks, but the environment at the rink sure hasn't.
 
Top Bottom