BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 52,072
- Reaction score
- 1,976
- Points
- 113
I don't see why we shouldn't have some optimism. DD seemed productive when actually given opportunity.I hope DD makes me eat all the crow in the world, but I have very little optimism about him being a #2 receiver.
I'm not so sure about that. We still have Morgan, CAB and DD have experience, and I have a ton of confidence in Fleck being able to coach up our WRs.Nobody will "replace" these two. They're 2 of the top 3 receivers in program history. The passing game will suffer immensely. I'm sure Autman-Bell and Douglas will catch a few more balls than they would've otherwise, but otherwise I'm thinking Spann-Ford and one of the frosh will have a much bigger role than would've been expected.
I would very much agree. Throughout PJs and Simon's career I don't think he's ever had a season without a WR drafted. Someone can check my history on that but it bodes well that we regularly have players waiting in the wings at WR.I'm not so sure about that. We still have Morgan, CAB and DD have experience, and I have a ton of confidence in Fleck being able to coach up our WRs.
I'm sorry, but when were these moments of productivity? He has about 250 yards in 2 seasons.I don't see why we shouldn't have some optimism. DD seemed productive when actually given opportunity.
On 3rd and 26I'm sorry, but when were these moments of productivity? He has about 250 yards in 2 seasons.
When they threw him the ball. As a previous poster mentioned, we lose to georgia southern without his production.I'm sorry, but when were these moments of productivity? He has about 250 yards in 2 seasons.
I agree, Jackson seems like he'll be a stud to me.Daniel Jackson is my dark horse to emerge. I’m surprised so many are sleeping on a 4-star WR recruit who had 27 TDs last season, after an ACL tear less than a year prior. Emilien seems to be getting more buzz. Hopefully, both can contribute early.
He one of those “smooth” athletes who makes everything look easy, and makes defenders look really bad in space.I agree, Jackson seems like he'll be a stud to me.
You say he is okay, and then say he would've been the best wideout on the team in any season between 2009 and 2016. Those two statements are contradictory. At minimum, McKnight, Maye, and Wolitarsky were all better and more productive. He hasn't even been 3rd in production yet, and it's not like CAB is an all-time great.On 3rd and 26
He is okay.
Not as good as Johnson or Bateman but not many are. But he hasn’t been on the field much and will produce okay.
he would’ve been the best wideout in any team in between decker and Johnson IMO
I appreciated McKnight as much as anyone, but he was the #1 option on his offense. Comparing his stats to Autman-Bell's or Douglas' is kinda BS when they have been vying for playing time behind two NFL receivers. McKnight barely touched the ball when Decker was on the field.You say he is okay, and then say he would've been the best wideout on the team in any season between 2009 and 2016. Those two statements are contradictory. At minimum, McKnight, Maye, and Wolitarsky were all better and more productive. He hasn't even been 3rd in production yet, and it's not like CAB is an all-time great.
I dunno if those 3 were all better. None of them were productive until their junior or senior years. They all posted roughly 50-70 catches for 600-800 yards. I think DD should post similar number if he wins the #2 spot outright and usage trends similar to the last 2 years.You say he is okay, and then say he would've been the best wideout on the team in any season between 2009 and 2016. Those two statements are contradictory. At minimum, McKnight, Maye, and Wolitarsky were all better and more productive. He hasn't even been 3rd in production yet, and it's not like CAB is an all-time great.
I agree with you he was less productive. I think he is better than all 3 of those guys just based on watching. He hasn’t had as many opportunities.You say he is okay, and then say he would've been the best wideout on the team in any season between 2009 and 2016. Those two statements are contradictory. At minimum, McKnight, Maye, and Wolitarsky were all better and more productive. He hasn't even been 3rd in production yet, and it's not like CAB is an all-time great.
We'll agree to disagree I guess. Maye and Wolitarsky both drew professional paychecks, and Wolitarsky is still playing in the CFL. Gray is another one I didn't even mention before - he was also better as a Gopher than Douglas. I'd be absolutely floored if Douglas is even invited to an NFL camp, and in fact I wouldn't at all be surprised if he sees the field this year as little as he did last year.I agree with you he was less productive. I think he is better than all 3 of those guys just based on watching. He hasn’t had as many opportunities.
Gray wasn’t a wideout for most of his time. He was a better wideout than Douglas.We'll agree to disagree I guess. Maye and Wolitarsky both drew professional paychecks, and Wolitarsky is still playing in the CFL. Gray is another one I didn't even mention before - he was also better as a Gopher than Douglas. I'd be absolutely floored if Douglas is even invited to an NFL camp, and in fact I wouldn't at all be surprised if he sees the field this year as little as he did last year.