Huh? It's the libs that are the hypocrites? Not the virtue signaling righties who argue that bakers should be able to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation....just to turn around are scream like babies about king Trump and allies being booted for inciting violence?
The only positive of facebook is sharing photos. I could see how it made more sense back in the mid to late 00s as well. I've really never understood Twitter however. Some people use it for news....most use it as a place out of conceit....as though anyone cares about their day to day goings on or what they think about random topics. Maybe it's just me....but I don't find celebrities posting about themselves as something that is interesting. Shocks me how many friends I have that are glued to it, as well as snapchat.
Of course not. Why should Twitter be held liable for dumbasses going on and promoting violence, posting nip picks, etc.? If Twitter itself (CEO/leaders/employees) are on there doing that, ok they should be held liable. But regular old users? Nah, that isn't Twitter's problem.
There were plenty of people here (and everywhere really) that wholeheartedly believed as recently as a year or so into the last administration that places like CNN are "straight down the middle". Today, not even the most hardcore progressive would argue that most of the major media outlets are unbiased
Howie would. Howie believes in CNN.
Most of the hard news is pretty unbiased. The right thinks if they get a black persons viewpoint its liberal bias. Thats about where we are at.
They provide the forum.
So true. CNN Derangement Syndrome.
Does it matter? Republicans say you can refuse to bake a cake for a gay couple, so Facebook can ban him for whatever reason they want. Thats Republican orthodoxy.
You didn't answer the question.
I’ve seen that argued in here in the past week.
PRECISELY!!!
Why would anyone who doesn't work at corporate HQ and has no authority and/or decision-making responsibility in the matter have to answer for what a private business did to Ron Paul?
He was elected as a Republican if I remember right. Are you telling me libertarian Ron Paul doesn't think businesses can refuse service to whoever they please? Really?
I don't care, I think its funny and the more terrorist tears I see the better.
You and others on here seem to accept it as ok. So if a business banned you for no reason, you’re good with that right?
No! But then... I'm NOT A LIBERTARIAN, AM I?!?!?
Ron Paul incited violence?
The Republicans and the Right have been fighting to allow businesses to do this for years and years. The left has been fighting for the oppressed and now when it comes back to bite them its, woe is me. Fucking pathetic...
You do know and are just refusing to admit it.
That is irrelevant to the guys and gals at corporate HQ. They don't have to answer your questions as to why Ron Paul was banned... at least, they don't have to according to libertarian dogma.
Here's a question: