But the changes to those temperatures happen much slower over time when they are naturally occurring. This proves that the rapid changes over the past 100-ish years are caused by humans. And so that disproves your assertion, and also proves that humans can slow down this increase by changing our behaviors.
No one says you can't change what you drive. Battery powered cars will do more damage to the environment and cause toxic waste.
Well, since you weren't around 3 billion years ago, your assertion is simply an assertion.
That's largely what happened here. GM has seen the success of Tesla and decided that is the future, and are now trying to get out in front of that.
Again, the rate of change the last 100 years is what disproves your idea. There have been temperature swings, but nowhere near as fast as they've been in this very modern period.
No. This sounds like a conspiracy idea, and I usually dismiss those since there is usually no evidence to support them.
Socialism for thee but not for me.
Kerry flying in a private plane is not an example of that.
Which is why we need a refundable carbon dividend. Make them pay. If you use less carbon than the average person you get a nice refund each year.
Another argument for the carbon dividend which is the climate plan the Young Republicans are pushing for.
GM is a dinosaur that should be allowed to die.
The rate doesn't prove anything except that the earth is heating up faster. You are attempting to make a correlation without actual causation. The cause is likely due to solar activity as well as geothermal activity. But, you can imagine us gnats are the cause of you wish. I only ask that your cronies don't legislate their sh!t on the rest of us while they fly the friendly skies.
The science behind climate change is very simple there is no dispute.
Well your hot air certainly isn't helping.
Just think on my analogy.
No that is false. And we are more responsible for whats in the atmosphere than any other country.
Nope, you're drinking the commie kool-aid. Go to China and protest your comrades pollution of the planet and human rights violations. While you're there get your comrades to pay for the Paris accords and give the US some cash to help us reduce emissions.
Who is “we”? And, specifically, why?
The sun monster is responsible
Prime example of why, in my idealistic youth, I wanted all people dead.The sun monster is responsible
I don't consider the sun to be a monster, but it certainly has more capacity to effect the earth than humans.The sun monster is responsible
Thats a red herring. If we stayed on the dump path we would be allowing China to dominate the high tech green future that is coming. That is more disturbing to me. I want to keep America on top, not in the 1950's.
Maybe.
I will entertain any peer reviewed scientific study you can cite that makes an argument for why the sudden, rapid increase in global temperatures over last 100 years is natural, when there is no evidence in observable temperature history of the planet of such rates in eras that sustained life (to my knowledge).
What alternative exists? Teleconferencing is not an option. Taking a commercial flight is not an option.
I will pay for the flight to China for WALLACE!
I've already been, once was enough. You can exile me to New Zealand...I will pay for the flight to China for WALLACE!
I am saying they should not be subsidised and they should thrive or fail according to the market.
Pretty sure MplsGopher would like to tag along. We can give them a sign, "Tiananmen Square or Bust."I will pay for the flight to China for WALLACE!
