North Korea Deal

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
16,603
Reaction score
871
Points
113
I read many sources of news. Unfortunately, most of them are incredibly lefty biased. Have you ever scanned Yahoo News? Most of the articles are from HuffPo, People, USA Today, and Yahoo itself. Real RW stuff. :rolleyes:
Part of the reason you are so very misinformed is because you automatically assume that anything outside of your RW media sphere is a left-wing political source. Rather, they are sources of information, biased to various degrees, and valid to various degrees. If you viewed them under the appropriate lenses instead of auto-rejecting anything that challenges your RW fantasies, you would be better informed.
 

LesBolstad

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
4,577
Reaction score
497
Points
83
Part of the reason you are so very misinformed is because you automatically assume that anything outside of your RW media sphere is a left-wing political source. Rather, they are sources of information, biased to various degrees, and valid to various degrees. If you viewed them under the appropriate lenses instead of auto-rejecting anything that challenges your RW fantasies, you would be better informed.
Cringy = nutjob. Give it up, Loony.
 

Section2

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,654
Reaction score
1,698
Points
113
Hey dude. There was a bunch more news out today about the Trump team working with and paying online trolls to help the 2016 election. The Russians did it. The Trump team did it. You contend that that stuff sways no one. So why do they all put so much effort into that stuff if it doesn't work at all?
I don’t think it sways anyone. It’s also not illegal so who cares? It’s not even unethical.
But you go ahead and lose sleep over Russian meme offensives.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
16,603
Reaction score
871
Points
113
I don’t think it sways anyone. It’s also not illegal so who cares? It’s not even unethical.
But you go ahead and lose sleep over Russian meme offensives.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Right. It doesn't sway anyone, which is why they have so many people working on it. Because it doesn't work, of course. And I have no family or friends on Facebook who post RW trash straight out of Russian or other RW troll farms or LW trash meant to stir up emotions. You RWers on here are never all up in arms about pointless BS like the fake "war on Christmas". LWers never get all up in arms by some of the same Russian troll farms posting stuff to rile up social unrest, or to promote defined "socialist" Bernie over HRC and get people turned against HRC. None of that ever happened. That would never happen. Those methods sway no one. Nobody.
 

KillerGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,507
Points
113
Part of the reason you are so very misinformed is because you automatically assume that anything outside of your RW media sphere is a left-wing political source. Rather, they are sources of information, biased to various degrees, and valid to various degrees. If you viewed them under the appropriate lenses instead of auto-rejecting anything that challenges your RW fantasies, you would be better informed.
No. I’m old enough to remember when news people didn’t demonstrate their bias with every word that comes out of their mouth, including Liberals, like Tim Russert, or newsmen like Bernard Shaw, formerly of CNN, when it was actually balanced news.

I have a lot more experience than you since I lived in an era that didn’t tell me what and how to think as it does today. I expect that you haven’t had that experience.
 

Section2

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,654
Reaction score
1,698
Points
113
Right. It doesn't sway anyone, which is why they have so many people working on it. Because it doesn't work, of course. And I have no family or friends on Facebook who post RW trash straight out of Russian or other RW troll farms or LW trash meant to stir up emotions. You RWers on here are never all up in arms about pointless BS like the fake "war on Christmas". LWers never get all up in arms by some of the same Russian troll farms posting stuff to rile up social unrest, or to promote defined "socialist" Bernie over HRC and get people turned against HRC. None of that ever happened. That would never happen. Those methods sway no one. Nobody.
Exactly how many people do they have working on it.
My sarcasm meter is broken, your friends and family post Russian memes on FB? FB is trash.
What does the war on Xmas have to do with anything? You think Russia was behind that? And you think they backed Hillary over a Commie who honeymooned in Moscow?

Wow, it’s amazing how much Russia has accomplished with memes. You can basically control the entire country. Who knew?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Deleted_User

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
7,831
Reaction score
531
Points
113
This thread is useless as there is no North Korean nuclear deal anywhere near even being written. They haven't agreed on anything in terms of the art of the deal.
 

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
16,603
Reaction score
871
Points
113
Exactly how many people do they have working on it.
My sarcasm meter is broken, your friends and family post Russian memes on FB? FB is trash.
What does the war on Xmas have to do with anything? You think Russia was behind that? And you think they backed Hillary over a Commie who honeymooned in Moscow?

Wow, it’s amazing how much Russia has accomplished with memes. You can basically control the entire country. Who knew?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My entire post was sarcasm, yes. And again, given the rest of your post, you don't read well. I wish you'd try harder.
 

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
16,603
Reaction score
871
Points
113
No. I’m old enough to remember when news people didn’t demonstrate their bias with every word that comes out of their mouth, including Liberals, like Tim Russert, or newsmen like Bernard Shaw, formerly of CNN, when it was actually balanced news.

I have a lot more experience than you since I lived in an era that didn’t tell me what and how to think as it does today. I expect that you haven’t had that experience.
All I can say to this is it is too bad that you refuse to parse the vast amount of facts that "liberals" in the non-RW media shower upon you from whatever you feel is their personal bias. You don't have to accept their opinions to accept their facts. The NYT editorial page is definitely biased to the left, but the NYT as a newspaper contains an enormous amount of high-quality, factual information on a daily basis. I don't see any good reason why one should not be willing to read the news in the NYT just because their editorial section leans hard left. The simple solution is to skip the editorial section. Not?
 
Last edited:

KillerGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,507
Points
113
All I can say to this is it is too bad that you refuse to parse the vast amount of facts that "liberals" in the non-RW media shower upon you from whatever you feel is their personal bias. You don't have to accept their opinions to accept their facts. The NYT editorial page is definitely biased to the left, but the NYT as a newspaper contains an enormous amount of high-quality, factual information on a daily basis. I don't see any good reason why one should not be willing to read the news in the NYT just because their editorial section leans hard left. The simple solution is to skip the editorial section. Not?
Yet you refuse to click on a conservative site. Hypocrite.
 

KillerGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,507
Points
113
Townhall.com = New York Times. False.
Brilliant. They’re different. But media bias is not unique to conservative websites, and tNYT is biased.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-n-y-times-editor-rips-trump-coverage-as-biased

Oh, I forgot you sensitivity:

A former executive editor of the New York Times says the paper’s news pages, the home of its straight-news coverage, have become “unmistakably anti-Trump.”

Jill Abramson, the veteran journalist who led the newspaper from 2011 to 2014, says the Times has a financial incentive to bash the president and that the imbalance is helping to erode its credibility...
 
Last edited:

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
16,603
Reaction score
871
Points
113
I just clicked on Townhall.com's main site. I wanted to see all of the "facts" I'm missing.

Top article:
"Mike Row Chimes In On Nike's Betsy Ross Play. His Take Is Spot On."

The next two:
"Democrats Enjoy Yelling Fire in a Crowded Theater"
"D.C. Metro Police Give Antifa What They Deserve"

Man, if I take in any more facts I'm not going to leave much room for the math I need at work. I better not overload. You win.
 

diehard

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
31,995
Reaction score
147
Points
63
The NYT is extremely biased for the loony left from the top of the front page to the bottom of the last page. Extreme left tilt front to back.
 

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
16,603
Reaction score
871
Points
113
Brilliant. They’re different. But media bias is not unique to conservative websites, and tNYT is biased.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-n-y-times-editor-rips-trump-coverage-as-biased

Oh, I forgot you sensitivity:

A former executive editor of the New York Times says the paper’s news pages, the home of its straight-news coverage, have become “unmistakably anti-Trump.”

Jill Abramson, the veteran journalist who led the newspaper from 2011 to 2014, says the Times has a financial incentive to bash the president and that the imbalance is helping to erode its credibility...
wait, so FOX News, which has a massive financial incentive to support the President, says that the NYT has a financial incentive to bash the president. (Which is probably true, and yet does not preclude the NYT from presenting facts...) Meanwhile, you readily accept any and all information spewed from any opinion show on FOX News (where the opinion shows have no need for presentation of facts), and you can also equate the NYT as a whole with the RW opinion website, Townhall.com. That's some pretty conflicting logic.
 

KillerGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,507
Points
113
wait, so FOX News, which has a massive financial incentive to support the President, says that the NYT has a financial incentive to bash the president. (Which is probably true, and yet does not preclude the NYT from presenting facts...) Meanwhile, you readily accept any and all information spewed from any opinion show on FOX News (where the opinion shows have no need for presentation of facts), and you can also equate the NYT as a whole with the RW opinion website, Townhall.com. That's some pretty conflicting logic.
No, a former NYT editor says that the NYT has a financial incentive to bash the president. Just like MSNBC and CNN. Geezus, even when I print the text, you can’t process it.

How do you know what I “readily accept”? You don’t know what I don’t accept, only some things that I do, and that’s not all that’s stated or printed in conservative media.
 

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
16,603
Reaction score
871
Points
113
No, a former NYT editor says that the NYT has a financial incentive to bash the president. Just like MSNBC and CNN. Geezus, even when I print the text, you can’t process it.

How do you know what I “readily accept”? You don’t know what I don’t accept, only some things that I do, and that’s not all that’s stated or printed in conservative media.
Dur, of course I read that (and agreed with it (!!!!)), and you're just going to ignore your gross logic conflict that I pointed out? Your media is hardly "conservative". I ask you again to post out your article full of facts from Townhall.com. What are you waiting for?
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
44,247
Reaction score
2,783
Points
113
Right. It doesn't sway anyone, which is why they have so many people working on it. Because it doesn't work, of course. And I have no family or friends on Facebook who post RW trash straight out of Russian or other RW troll farms or LW trash meant to stir up emotions. You RWers on here are never all up in arms about pointless BS like the fake "war on Christmas". LWers never get all up in arms by some of the same Russian troll farms posting stuff to rile up social unrest, or to promote defined "socialist" Bernie over HRC and get people turned against HRC. None of that ever happened. That would never happen. Those methods sway no one. Nobody.
2 hasn't seen it happening in Edina, which means it's not important and people don't care about it. Vlad's cronies just did it for a laugh and to rile you up.
 

KillerGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,507
Points
113
Dur, of course I read that (and agreed with it (!!!!)), and you're just going to ignore your gross logic conflict that I pointed out? Your media is hardly "conservative". I ask you again to post out your article full of facts from Townhall.com. What are you waiting for?
I don’t even know which thread it was on. If it means that much to you, find the post and I’ll print the text. Or, you could just click on the link.

And you said “Fox News said”. That was clearly wrong.
 

KillerGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,507
Points
113
Dur, of course I read that (and agreed with it (!!!!)), and you're just going to ignore your gross logic conflict that I pointed out? Your media is hardly "conservative". I ask you again to post out your article full of facts from Townhall.com. What are you waiting for?
I’m waiting...but not much longer. I’ve wasted enough time with you tonight.
 

KillerGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,507
Points
113
I don’t even know which thread it was on. If it means that much to you, find the post and I’ll print the text. Or, you could just click on the link.

And you said “Fox News said”. That was clearly wrong.
I gave cinnamon almost an hour to find the post so I could post the text of the link, but no reply from him. Chickensh!t.
 

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
16,603
Reaction score
871
Points
113
I don’t even know which thread it was on. If it means that much to you, find the post and I’ll print the text. Or, you could just click on the link.

And you said “Fox News said”. That was clearly wrong.
EXACTLY. And I don't either, and this is your important article, not mine. Clearly you don't much think this is a winner for you, though, because I'm sure you'd be looking hard for that winner. Maybe you can share a future opinion article from Townhall that contains all facts. I'll be waiting.

I gave cinnamon almost an hour to find the post so I could post the text of the link, but no reply from him. Chickensh!t.
This is some looney toon stuff right here. Sometimes you expose yourself as clearly not having all of your marbles together. Get some sleep and regroup.
 
Last edited:

KillerGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,507
Points
113
EXACTLY. And I don't either, and this is your important article, not mine. Clearly you don't much think this is a winner for you, though, because I'm sure you'd be looking hard for that winner. Maybe you can share a future opinion article from Townhall that contains all facts. I'll be waiting.

This is some looney toon stuff right here. Sometimes you expose yourself as clearly not having all of your marbles together. Get some sleep and regroup.
“EXACTLY” what? You’re the one that brought the article back up, not me. You’re the one that keeps bringing it up, long after I had forgotten about it.

And since it meant so much to you, I said if you want to find it, I’ll post the text. Then, you don’t respond for over an hour, until after I was off the forum, to claim victory.

You’re clearly smarter in your mind than you are in reality.

I apologize to all others for the digression of this thread.
 
Last edited:

diehard

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
31,995
Reaction score
147
Points
63
“EXACTLY” what? You’re the one that brought the article back up, not me. You’re the one that keeps bringing it up, long after I had forgotten about it.

And since it meant so much to you, I said if you want to find it, I’ll post the text. Then, you don’t respond for over an hour, until after I was off the forum, to claim victory.

You’re clearly smarter in your mind than you are in reality.

I apologize to all others for the digression of this thread.
Apology accepted.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
 

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
16,603
Reaction score
871
Points
113
“EXACTLY” what? You’re the one that brought the article back up, not me. You’re the one that keeps bringing it up, long after I had forgotten about it.

And since it meant so much to you, I said if you want to find it, I’ll post the text. Then, you don’t respond for over an hour, until after I was off the forum, to claim victory.

You’re clearly smarter in your mind than you are in reality.

I apologize to all others for the digression of this thread.
Your posts in this thread have bordered on insanity, and I feel embarrassed for you.

Going forward, I'll ask you something simple for what is not the first time. Find me an article - any article - on Townhall.com that you think is full of facts, and copy/paste it here. We can digest those facts for their true worth.
 

LesBolstad

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
4,577
Reaction score
497
Points
83
Your posts in this thread have bordered on insanity, and I feel embarrassed for you.

Going forward, I'll ask you something simple for what is not the first time. Find me an article - any article - on Townhall.com that you think is full of facts, and copy/paste it here. We can digest those facts for their true worth.
We're all embarrassed for you cringy. KGF got it 100% "You’re clearly smarter in your mind than you are in reality."
 

JimmyJamesMD

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
7,794
Reaction score
808
Points
113
The North Korea talks are said to be back on.
Kim probably needs his ego stroked for a bit. Which is better than the alternative, war, which is what Bolton wanted, and one of the reasons he got the boot.
 
Top Bottom