A lot of your concerns depend on how much you think a lack of spring ball, normal off-season workouts and fall camp really impacted our team. If one trusts what we can do with our "normal" program, then one expects big improvement in a lot of young players. But if one thinks that 2020 was an exposure of lack of talent or bad coaching, then there definitely are a lot more concerns.
Glass half full or glass half empty?
Yeah I agree, a lot of those concerns might be answered by Fall. I feel like it's at least plausible, if not likely, that every one of those concerns is answered in a positive manner. I'd say WR and CB would be the two I'd be most pleasantly surprised if they were filled in the manner I'd hope they would be. From info from another site, it doesn't sound like a couple of our younger WR's (Nam for one) are living up to what the staff hoped they would be. I do like Wright a ton as a transfer and both Jackson and Emelien were said to be impressive in camp, but I think Wright is the only one of the 3 that could provide us that home run threat that Bateman brought to the table. At CB, Walley might be my favorite recruit in this class outside of Eastern, but counting on a true freshman to play a major role is dicey. Unfortunately Smith coming on seems like wishful thinking at this point.
At LB with Gibbens coming in and getting Oliver back, there's a lot of options. Considering we often only have 2 LB's on the field, if we can't find two to play well next year that points a lot more towards scheme.
On the DL, will Brown move to the edge after his redshirt year? The Joiner kid the staff was high on as a late flip last year didn't play last year and he's another option along with Jalen Redding who got some snaps. Knock on wood but the DT position has young guys with good recruiting pedigrees and older guys that have played a lot of football. On paper, we've got everything we could want there except for proven production (beyond Pinckney's 3rd team All ACC season).