McCabe Fired

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
4,396
Reaction score
199
Points
63
He lied to get us into the war, and he'll still tell you it was worth it.
1. NeoCon Foreign policy
2. Anti-Free Trade
3. No concern for budget deficit

This guy is really trying to kill what is left of the Republican party.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
40,487
Reaction score
1,272
Points
113
For this moment in time, Trump wants a team in place that makes North Korea, to name one, believe that Trump has a guy in place that might actually take him out. That's part of the negotiations. That's part of why Kim is thinking about denuking. Trump has put foreign policy in a better place in one year. Much better.
You can't possibly believe some of the things you post here. Trump is not playing 3D chess. He's hiring people he sees on Fox News because that's who he trusts, even whack jobs like John Bolton. And also because at this point no one else wants the job.
 

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
4,396
Reaction score
199
Points
63
You can't possibly believe some of the things you post here. Trump is not playing 3D chess. He's hiring people he sees on Fox News because that's who he trusts, even whack jobs like John Bolton. And also because at this point no one else wants the job.
Tomi Lahren needs a post. She's better to look at than Bolton.
 

diehard

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
31,597
Reaction score
35
Points
48
You can't possibly believe some of the things you post here. Trump is not playing 3D chess. He's hiring people he sees on Fox News because that's who he trusts, even whack jobs like John Bolton. And also because at this point no one else wants the job.
It is 3D chess and you do not even know how to play checkers, now or ever. Please keep posting though, you are a hoot!
 

diehard

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
31,597
Reaction score
35
Points
48
For this moment in time, Trump wants a team in place that makes North Korea, to name one, believe that Trump has a guy in place that might actually take him out. That's part of the negotiations. That's part of why Kim is thinking about denuking. Trump has put foreign policy in a better place in one year. Much better.
You made it onto the chess board.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
38,907
Reaction score
1,317
Points
113

jamiche

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
20,295
Reaction score
213
Points
63
McCabe has figured out that he is going to be prosecuted :): https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-mccabe-defense/former-fbi-deputy-mccabe-launches-legal-defense-fund-in-wake-of-firing-idUSKBN1H52P3?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5abd2e5b04d3012d547c1f04&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

It's a good idea for him to get his legal defense funding raised before a host of others do the same... I give him credit for the proactive move!
By your hateful logic, BoardGod, Trump is guilty, too. The problem is that he can't find anybody who wants to represent him. He may end up hiring nasa, decker and less, dispensing with the requirements of a law degree and the capacity to properly punctuate and complete a sentence.
 

Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
20,678
Reaction score
327
Points
83
In the past 24 hours the IG Horowitz announced he's now moving onto the FBI/FISA application abuse due to issues he encountered while investigating the FBI handling of the Clinton email scandal, Andy McCabe is lawering up & today the outside prosecutor who's been secretly working with Horowitz has been announced as the U.S. Attorney from Utah, John Huber.
 

stocker08

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
18,090
Reaction score
293
Points
83
Horowitz, an Obama appointee, must be part of this deep state that we keep hearing about.

Sent from my KFGIWI using Tapatalk
 

diehard

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
31,597
Reaction score
35
Points
48
Horowitz has begun making criminal referrals in the FISC investigation.
 

Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
20,678
Reaction score
327
Points
83
Horowitz has begun making criminal referrals in the FISC investigation.
That's what I'm hearing as well, which explains McCabe. That means more will be soon lawyering up as well. It was pure 3D chess on Sessions' part not to announce the prosecutor until all the evidence was already collected and to have the person working outside the beltway.

It's also important to note that the investigation has already taken place into the FISA abuse (the Steele "dossier"/Russian collusion narrative as well most likely) and this is just them begining to clean up the guilty parties. i.e. This is not the beginning of the investigation, but rather, it's coming down the back stretch.

It's a safe bet Strzok, Page, Ohr, Preistap & Baker are all cooperating witnesses & have been for months. So who's next for the criminal referrals? Michael Kortan ("Mike"), David Laufman ("Dave"), Tricia Beth Anderson ("Trish") & maybe FISA Judge Rudolph Contreras ("Rudy")?
 

justthefacts

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
8,542
Reaction score
337
Points
83
In the past 24 hours the IG Horowitz announced he's now moving onto the FBI/FISA application abuse due to issues he encountered while investigating the FBI handling of the Clinton email scandal, Andy McCabe is lawering up & today the outside prosecutor who's been secretly working with Horowitz has been announced as the U.S. Attorney from Utah, John Huber.
The bolded is made up. The entire OIG statement is below and it doesn't even imply what you're saying it states:

https://oig.justice.gov/press/2018/2018-03-28b.pdf

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 28, 2018
DOJ OIG Announces Initiation of Review
Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz announced today
that, in response to requests from the Attorney General and Members of Congress, the Office
of the Inspector General (OIG) will initiate a review that will examine the Justice Department’s
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) compliance with legal requirements, and with
applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) relating to a certain U.S. person. As part of this
examination, the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the
time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source. Additionally,
the OIG will review the DOJ’s and FBI’s relationship and communications with the alleged
source as they relate to the FISC applications.

If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise
during the course of the review.
 

Sportsfan24

Active member
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
12,686
Reaction score
4
Points
36
The fun part will be watching the same folks being applauded now, quickly become Deep State, Obama sleepers when they don’t do as hoped.[emoji15]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
20,678
Reaction score
327
Points
83
The bolded is made up. The entire OIG statement is below and it doesn't even imply what you're saying it states:

https://oig.justice.gov/press/2018/2018-03-28b.pdf

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 28, 2018
DOJ OIG Announces Initiation of Review
Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz announced today
that, in response to requests from the Attorney General and Members of Congress, the Office
of the Inspector General (OIG) will initiate a review that will examine the Justice Department’s
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) compliance with legal requirements, and with
applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) relating to a certain U.S. person. As part of this
examination, the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the
time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source. Additionally,
the OIG will review the DOJ’s and FBI’s relationship and communications with the alleged
source as they relate to the FISC applications.

If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise
during the course of the review.
Read the last sentence of the statement you posted.

I accept your apology.
 

justthefacts

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
8,542
Reaction score
337
Points
83
Read the last sentence of the statement you posted.

I accept your apology.
How does, "If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review," even approximate, "In the past 24 hours the IG Horowitz announced he's now moving onto the FBI/FISA application abuse due to issues he encountered while investigating the FBI handling of the Clinton email scandal."

The OIG is saying that IF something in the FISA handling review warrants he'll look into other issues. He in no way, shape, or form, implies that he's looking at the FISA handling as a result of the Clinton email investigation. In fact, he says specifically, "in response to requests from the Attorney General and Members of Congress."
 

Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
20,678
Reaction score
327
Points
83
How does, "If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review," even approximate, "In the past 24 hours the IG Horowitz announced he's now moving onto the FBI/FISA application abuse due to issues he encountered while investigating the FBI handling of the Clinton email scandal."

The OIG is saying that IF something in the FISA handling review warrants he'll look into other issues. He in no way, shape, or form, implies that he's looking at the FISA handling as a result of the Clinton email investigation. In fact, he says specifically, "in response to requests from the Attorney General and Members of Congress."
His mandate was to investigate the FBI's handling of the Clinton email server scandal.

"If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise
during the course of the review.".

Now he's investigating potential FBI/FISA abuses. Clearly the "circumstances warrant" "including other issues" (FBI/FISA abuse) that have arisen "during the course of the review".

i.e. He can not move on to the FBI/FISA abuse unless he saw reason to do so while investigating the FBI's handling of the Clinton email scandal.
 

Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
20,678
Reaction score
327
Points
83
A point of clarification....

The following sentence (which is nearly identical to the last sentence of the latest announcement) was included in the initial DOJ announcement of IG Horowitz investigating the FBI's handling of the Clinton email server. This is the point I'm referencing

"Finally, if circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review."


https://oig.justice.gov/press/2017/2017-01-12.pdf
 

justthefacts

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
8,542
Reaction score
337
Points
83
His mandate was to investigate the FBI's handling of the Clinton email server scandal.

"If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise
during the course of the review.".

Now he's investigating potential FBI/FISA abuses. Clearly the "circumstances warrant" "including other issues" (FBI/FISA abuse) that have arisen "during the course of the review".

i.e. He can not move on to the FBI/FISA abuse unless he saw reason to do so while investigating the FBI's handling of the Clinton email scandal.
There is nothing that states he can't move on to FISA handling irrespective of the Clinton email case. If the two are related, why say they're investigating FISA handling due to requests from Sessions and Congress?
 

diehard

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
31,597
Reaction score
35
Points
48
There is nothing that states he can't move on to FISA handling irrespective of the Clinton email case. If the two are related, why say they're investigating FISA handling due to requests from Sessions and Congress?
Desperation. We are going to see a lot of this. Nines has another memo that will be released. Very bad for those wearing the D jersey. The DOJ and FBI will only do what they are forced to do. They are very concerned about totally destroying the reputations of the agecies.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
 

cncmin

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
15,633
Reaction score
387
Points
83
There is nothing that states he can't move on to FISA handling irrespective of the Clinton email case. If the two are related, why say they're investigating FISA handling due to requests from Sessions and Congress?
I appreciate that you bother with these clueless clowns, but why? No matter how many facts you post, or absurd arguments of theirs that you tear apart, they learn nothing at all. That said, I thank you for your service.
 

Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
20,678
Reaction score
327
Points
83
There is nothing that states he can't move on to FISA handling irrespective of the Clinton email case. If the two are related, why say they're investigating FISA handling due to requests from Sessions and Congress?
Sure there is. The original statement reads as follows & clearly outlines the scope of his investigation. No where does it say he is authorized to investigate FBI/FISA abuse unless..."OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review."

"The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) will initiate a review of allegations regarding certain actions by the Department of Justice (Department) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in advance of the 2016 election. Cognizant of the scope of the OIG’s jurisdiction under Section 8E of the Inspector General Act, the review will examine the following issues:

• Allegations that Department or FBI policies or procedures were not followed in connection with, or in actions leading up to or related to, the FBI Director’s public announcement on July 5, 2016, and the Director’s letters to Congress on October 28 and November 6, 2016, and that certain underlying investigative decisions were based on improper considerations;

• Allegations that the FBI Deputy Director should have been recused from participating in
certain investigative matters;

• Allegations that the Department’s Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs
improperly disclosed non-public information to the Clinton campaign and/or should have been recused from participating in certain matters;

• Allegations that Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information; and

• Allegations that decisions regarding the timing of the FBI’s release of certain Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents on October 30 and November 1, 2016, and the use of a Twitter account to publicize same, were influenced by improper considerations.

The review will not substitute the OIG’s judgment for the judgments made by the FBI or the Department regarding the substantive merits of investigative or prosecutive decisions. Finally, if circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review."
 

justthefacts

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
8,542
Reaction score
337
Points
83
So you're saying that the OIG was never, ever going to investigate other matters again unless they pertained to the Clinton email investigation? That's how Hannity works, not the OIG.

Face it, you made something up and have absolutely no evidence of it, so you're doing your best to save face
 

justthefacts

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
8,542
Reaction score
337
Points
83
By CRG's logic we can conclude that the Clinton email investigation led to this audit of the ATF. Was John Podesta selling black market cigarettes?

 

diehard

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
31,597
Reaction score
35
Points
48
No that was when Manafort was on the Podesta payroll to work magic with Russia.
 

Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
20,678
Reaction score
327
Points
83
So you're saying that the OIG was never, ever going to investigate other matters again unless they pertained to the Clinton email investigation? That's how Hannity works, not the OIG.

Face it, you made something up and have absolutely no evidence of it, so you're doing your best to save face
I'm quoting the actual mandate outlined by the IG where the five issues they were authorized to investigate were laid out. What are you quoting?

Not only does it not say they can just investigate anything they like (such as FISA abuse), it details which specific things they'd be investigating. Then they added the caveat that if during the course of that investigation "other issues" arose, they could then include them in their investigation. That's how they got to the FISA abuse investigation.
 

diehard

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
31,597
Reaction score
35
Points
48
That was the charter FOR THAT PARTICULAR INVESTIGATION. The OIG investigates lots of unrelated things. See here https://oig.justice.gov/reports/all.htm

Are you saying every report on that list stemmed from the Clinton email investigation?
There is a relationship that you refuse to recognize and there is little anyone can do to smarten you up even a little bit.
 
Top Bottom