GopherLady
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2008
- Messages
- 9,094
- Reaction score
- 141
- Points
- 63
absolutely not if you look at the stance the administration has taken regarding thisNext question - will the Gophers pursue a new schedule like Nebraska, Iowa, Penn State, Ohio State and Michigan are doing?
Key word pursue, sounds like TV rights and other B1G contracts might prevent thisNext question - will the Gophers pursue a new schedule like Nebraska, Iowa, Penn State, Ohio State and Michigan are doing?
It will be complicated but if those five teams team up I don't think the Big Ten will be in a position to stand in their way. Big ten might need those 5 more than those 5 need the big ten, if it comes right down to it.Key word pursue, sounds like TV rights and other B1G contracts might prevent this
Given that the University Presidents made this decision I would highly doubt anyone in the conference will go against it.Next question - will the Gophers pursue a new schedule like Nebraska, Iowa, Penn State, Ohio State and Michigan are doing?
Agree with a lot of that especially the inevitability and the rest probably falling in line quickly. But the next few days will be combustibleGiven that the University Presidents made this decision I would highly doubt anyone in the conference will go against it.
On top of that, now that the Big Ten has done it the rest will fall in line pretty quickly. The SEC will probably hold out the longest but once the other Power 5 conferences all decide to move to the spring the SEC will give as well and join in. This all has felt very inevitable for some time now.
And is there liability exposure by not having a season? Seniors wanted a chance to show their stuff to get into the NFL, and if that season doesn't happen, you've hurt their ability to make it to that big paycheck. My point being there are multiple sides to the decisions being made.Not surprising. Better to be safe than sorry. No matter how much people want to see football, the universities couldn't risk the liability.
Hard to imagine that's a "liability" for the school...And is there liability exposure by not having a season? Seniors wanted a chance to show their stuff to get into the NFL, and if that season doesn't happen, you've hurt their ability to make it to that big paycheck. My point being there are multiple sides to the decisions being made.
There's a lot of Tweets from seniors saying they want to play so they can build their "I'm NFL" resume. You know some lawyer's going to chase that ambulance... There are lawsuits already filed w/rpt to students not getting the services (meaning classroom instructions) for which they paid. It's not much of a stretch to apply that thinking to students that signed a contract to participate in a sport, and the school then making the decision to not offer that sport. Interesting times ahead for Coyle et. al.Hard to imagine that's a "liability" for the school...
One thing you can always count on is that someone will be willing to sue and there will be a lawyer out there willing to take the case.There's a lot of Tweets from seniors saying they want to play so they can build their "I'm NFL" resume. You know some lawyer's going to chase that ambulance... There are lawsuits already filed w/rpt to students not getting the services (meaning classroom instructions) for which they paid. It's not much of a stretch to apply that thinking to students that signed a contract to participate in a sport, and the school then making the decision to not offer that sport. Interesting times ahead for Coyle et. al.
Someone might do a thing.There's a lot of Tweets from seniors saying they want to play so they can build their "I'm NFL" resume. You know some lawyer's going to chase that ambulance... There are lawsuits already filed w/rpt to students not getting the services (meaning classroom instructions) for which they paid. It's not much of a stretch to apply that thinking to students that signed a contract to participate in a sport, and the school then making the decision to not offer that sport. Interesting times ahead for Coyle et. al.
The Big Ten and the Pac 12 were the two most frequently discussed as the most likely to go this route. Only a matter of time until the other 3 make similar announcements.And the Pac12 quickly follows:
There's a lot of Tweets from seniors saying they want to play so they can build their "I'm NFL" resume. You know some lawyer's going to chase that ambulance... There are lawsuits already filed w/rpt to students not getting the services (meaning classroom instructions) for which they paid. It's not much of a stretch to apply that thinking to students that signed a contract to participate in a sport, and the school then making the decision to not offer that sport. Interesting times ahead for Coyle et. al.
Not to mention the lawsuits for any kind of medical or death cases related to covid would be much costlier financially.Seen a lot of dumb takes the last few days... saying that schools should be fearful of lawsuits from players not getting to play a game during the worst global pandemic in 100 years while getting their education paid for in full is up there
The players are learning a life lesson. The overarching and suffocating concern over liability and negative media relations has inflicted collateral damage on (for many) their passion, and bit them in the behinds.One thing you can always count on is that someone will be willing to sue and there will be a lawyer out there willing to take the case.
Out of the thousand or more athletes in the B1G football program, I highly doubt the universities are concerned about the liability of a handful of athletes chances in the NFL...Just Sayin'There's a lot of Tweets from seniors saying they want to play so they can build their "I'm NFL" resume. You know some lawyer's going to chase that ambulance... There are lawsuits already filed w/rpt to students not getting the services (meaning classroom instructions) for which they paid. It's not much of a stretch to apply that thinking to students that signed a contract to participate in a sport, and the school then making the decision to not offer that sport. Interesting times ahead for Coyle et. al.
There's a lot of Tweets from seniors saying they want to play so they can build their "I'm NFL" resume. You know some lawyer's going to chase that ambulance... There are lawsuits already filed w/rpt to students not getting the services (meaning classroom instructions) for which they paid. It's not much of a stretch to apply that thinking to students that signed a contract to participate in a sport, and the school then making the decision to not offer that sport. Interesting times ahead for Coyle et. al.
[/QUOTE
You are writing nonsense.
B1G, and now the Pac-12, was looking for something...any kind of liability issue, that they could use to justify their reasoning. In the StarTrib article (https://www.startribune.com/big-ten-postpones-fall-sports-including-football-indefinitely/572078292/) it states:From a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota regarding myocarditis and college sports:
Quote Tweet
![]()
Michael J. Ackerman MD,PhD
@MJAckermanMDPhD
· 4h
If #medical experts for the Pac-12 and Big 10 #CollegeFootball conferences are using the very good @JAMACardio paper on cardiac MRI findings in #COVID19 patients as compelling for cancellation, that is a big FOUL. The data does NOT support this at all! #WeWantToPlay #RefuseToFear