KillerGopherFan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 18,762
- Reaction score
- 2,460
- Points
- 113
Illegal immigration is quickly becoming one of the central issues of the 2020 elections. IMO, Democrats have been attempting to define the illegal immigration issue as a human rights concern instead of a country sovereignty, security, border, and justice issue.
Democrats have appealed to the natural and strong compassion that our country has for people seeking a better life and concern for families. Republicans, most of whom share those concerns of humanity, have appealed to our need for the rule of law, our rights to secure our country and protect our borders from unknown, undesirable, and criminal aliens though they may be a fraction of the illegals, and to control immigration legally and thoughtfully.
Democrats and Republicans have largely ignored this issue for the longest time as both sides saw benefits and pressure to accept an illegal functioning population. But the Central American wave of illegal families has complicated the immigration issue far more than a majority Mexican male illegals that had been the primary violators.
Here is where I see the Democrats stance:
1) decriminalize illegal immigration
2) no deportations except those with felony records
3) a path to citizenship for those with US citizen family members
4) entitlements for illegals in the form of healthcare, education (including access to college aid), etc.
5) high standards for the temporary living accommodations for non-citizens caught illegally crossing the US border
6) citizenship for DACA recipients
If that’s not a position of “Open Borders”, I don’t know that I could think of anything that could be more suggestive of it.
IMO, the consensus Republicans stance resembles the following:
1) control immigration only via legal means and methods
2) deport in order of priority, criminals, those w/ deportation orders, any illegal without family in the US, and lastly, illegals that have had significant violations of the law and/or evaded authorities.
3) no path to citizenship for any recent immigrant crossing illegally
4) limited entitlements.
5) functional, hygienic, and reasonable temporary living accommodations for non-citizens caught illegally crossing the US border
6) a long pathway to citizenship for DACA provided that they are productive, non-criminal members of society.
7) a significant modification and expansion of the work visa/green card program to allow non-citizens to enter and exit the country legally as needed for business and employment.
8) Perhaps, even remain in the US as a non-citizen if family members have citizenship, but with very limited entitlements.
What is the heck is wrong with that?
Democrats have appealed to the natural and strong compassion that our country has for people seeking a better life and concern for families. Republicans, most of whom share those concerns of humanity, have appealed to our need for the rule of law, our rights to secure our country and protect our borders from unknown, undesirable, and criminal aliens though they may be a fraction of the illegals, and to control immigration legally and thoughtfully.
Democrats and Republicans have largely ignored this issue for the longest time as both sides saw benefits and pressure to accept an illegal functioning population. But the Central American wave of illegal families has complicated the immigration issue far more than a majority Mexican male illegals that had been the primary violators.
Here is where I see the Democrats stance:
1) decriminalize illegal immigration
2) no deportations except those with felony records
3) a path to citizenship for those with US citizen family members
4) entitlements for illegals in the form of healthcare, education (including access to college aid), etc.
5) high standards for the temporary living accommodations for non-citizens caught illegally crossing the US border
6) citizenship for DACA recipients
If that’s not a position of “Open Borders”, I don’t know that I could think of anything that could be more suggestive of it.
IMO, the consensus Republicans stance resembles the following:
1) control immigration only via legal means and methods
2) deport in order of priority, criminals, those w/ deportation orders, any illegal without family in the US, and lastly, illegals that have had significant violations of the law and/or evaded authorities.
3) no path to citizenship for any recent immigrant crossing illegally
4) limited entitlements.
5) functional, hygienic, and reasonable temporary living accommodations for non-citizens caught illegally crossing the US border
6) a long pathway to citizenship for DACA provided that they are productive, non-criminal members of society.
7) a significant modification and expansion of the work visa/green card program to allow non-citizens to enter and exit the country legally as needed for business and employment.
8) Perhaps, even remain in the US as a non-citizen if family members have citizenship, but with very limited entitlements.
What is the heck is wrong with that?