Gophers Offense

Gophs24

Active member
Joined
Mar 8, 2018
Messages
606
Reaction score
84
Points
28
Just watching this team I always figured they were not real great on offense. But when you look up the stats it gets real depressing!

43.9% FG Percentage ranks 219 in the nation
65.9% FT Percentage ranks 287 in the nation
31.7% 3P percentage ranks 278 in the nation

clearly we miss a ton of wide open shots. but it doesn't help us any that Pitino doesn't seem to be any good at coming up with any offensive sets.
 

bleedsmaroonandgold

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
5,772
Reaction score
54
Points
48
The biggest thing for me is how bad we look when teams hit us with a zone. It's happened often enough, you would think we would have implemented an answer by now.
 

march madness

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
2,781
Reaction score
36
Points
48
We can play better against a zone, no doubt, but it really is an achilies heal for us with our bad shooting. It's a wonder teams don't play it against us more. Probably because when Murphy is high motor, he would get 20 rebounds against it. But an athletic team like Maryland doesn't need to worry about that.

Oturu will be like Fernando is a couple of years with 30 lbs of muscle. This Maryland team reminds me of old Ohio St teams. Athletic team that can shoot, guards that penetrate dish or score. Probably a top 25 team if they keep improving.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
40,496
Reaction score
2,232
Points
113
The biggest thing for me is how bad we look when teams hit us with a zone. It's happened often enough, you would think we would have implemented an answer by now.
Washington- slasher McBrayer - slasher Coffey- slasher Murphy - likes to drive from the high post Oturo- has to get the ball low

Kalscheur is the only real pure jump shooter in the bunch. Considering the talents of our players- I have no idea why anyone plays man to man against us- as we are basically a dribble drive team. Murphy gets hurt badly by the zone.

I have seen Pitino set some one up at the free throw line and attack the post from there with the pass and that has worked- but he didn't do that last night much.
 

rockford

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Messages
966
Reaction score
1
Points
18
The biggest thing for me is how bad we look when teams hit us with a zone. It's happened often enough, you would think we would have implemented an answer by now.
Seemed to me that when we challenged the zone inside, we were successful more often than not. But we seemed very reluctant to even try to get inside against it.

JTG
 

gall0249

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Messages
764
Reaction score
11
Points
18
Our bad 3-point shooting was already covered in another thread. It’s a myth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

big10guy

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
703
Reaction score
18
Points
18
Our approach to attacking a zone always seems like we're confused. Why? We should certainly be practicing against it. Running the weave against a zone? We just get tired while the defense just stands there. We should be surprised if anyone ever plays us man-to-man.

And is there any reason why we can't get the damn ball inbounds from the baseline? Besides the fact the guys just waltz through the lane with no picks?
 

BarnBurner

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
10,798
Reaction score
525
Points
113
Washington- slasher McBrayer - slasher Coffey- slasher Murphy - likes to drive from the high post Oturo- has to get the ball low

Kalscheur is the only real pure jump shooter in the bunch. Considering the talents of our players- I have no idea why anyone plays man to man against us- as we are basically a dribble drive team. Murphy gets hurt badly by the zone.

I have seen Pitino set some one up at the free throw line and attack the post from there with the pass and that has worked- but he didn't do that last night much.
I said in another thread that the turning point for me was when Gabe was hit with the phantom foul #2. Took a hot shooter, our real threat, out of the game midways through the first half.
 

Moonlight

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
83
Points
48
I said in another thread that the turning point for me was when Gabe was hit with the phantom foul #2. Took a hot shooter, our real threat, out of the game midways through the first half.
It's not like Gabe is so critical to the total game plan that keeping him in there would have been awful (re: picking up a third). I thought GK should have been back in much sooner.
 

jovs

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
3,501
Reaction score
93
Points
48
Seemed to me that when we challenged the zone inside, we were successful more often than not. But we seemed very reluctant to even try to get inside against it.

JTG
Gee, ya think that might work, who'd a thunk, not exactly revolutionairy, pathetic coaching.
 

GophersInIowa

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
25,498
Reaction score
1,054
Points
113
It's not like Gabe is so critical to the total game plan that keeping him in there would have been awful (re: picking up a third). I thought GK should have been back in much sooner.
I think if we had fallen behind earlier in the game we may have seen him more but the Gophers still had a 6 point lead at half.
 

Bad Gopher

A Loner, A Rebel
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
17,698
Reaction score
1,788
Points
113
How is it possible that a Division I basketball team has only one standout jump shooter? My neice's high school team has more than that.
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
7,796
Reaction score
389
Points
83
How is it possible that a Division I basketball team has only one standout jump shooter? My neice's high school team has more than that.
What we have is a pitbull basketball team. Only one or two conventional shooters.
It's like watching toys from the island of misfit toys play basketball. They get it done, but it ain't pretty.
 
Top Bottom