Lawyers in individual fraud cases are going to argue narrowly. That's how you win. I can't read the paywalled article. I would never pay a cent for an MSM article. Toilet paper for the most part. They will find credible fraud so prepare those ears.I've said over and over, if they find credible fraud, I am all ears. So far all we have is hearsay and conspiracy theories.
Trumps lawyers are admitting as much in court, they have nothing.
IT Contractor for Dominion Ballott Counting Software Co. Exposes Massive Ballott Fraud in Detroit Michigan
Odd that Senator Pat Tomey (R-PA) doesn't agree with you Boo
Pennsylvania's Republican senator shoots down Trump's claims of voter fraud
BUT I'M SURE YOU KNOW MORE THAN THAT RINO DOES, LOL
Did you also miss this LBGA?
Postal worker admits fabricating Trump-pushed claims of voter fraud in Pa., House panel says
From the article -
A postal worker in Pennsylvania has admitted to making up explosive accusations about mail-in voting irregularities in the 2020 election that were picked up by supporters of President Donald Trump as supposed evidence of fraud, according to congressional investigators.
Richard Hopkins, a U.S. Postal Service employee in Erie, Pa., first alleged last week that his supervisor had instructed staff to backdate mail-in ballots cast after Election Day in order to get them counted — which would be illegal.
The claims were seized on by the Trump campaign and congressional Republicans as proof that Trump had good reason not to concede the election to President-elect Joe Biden — especially since Hopkins had signed a sworn affidavit to certify his allegations.
But Hopkins admitted to investigators from the U.S. Postal Service inspector general’s office on Monday that his allegations were false, according to the House Oversight Committee.
“IG investigators informed committee staff today that they interviewed Hopkins on Friday, but that Hopkins RECANTED HIS ALLEGATIONS yesterday and did not explain why he signed a false affidavit,” the Democrat-led committee tweeted late Tuesday.
** Did you actually watch this? **
She brings up all sorts of things, but never claims that anything was actually done illegally. The first one is all distraction to make you think something happened, when all they do it outlay the process. When describing what happens when there is an error on a ballot in a batch of 50 she says 'the process would be to take out the ballots, put the error on top and then delete the batch and rescan them." She then nods her head as if there is something dubious is implied, when all she did was describe a process. Then the interviewer says "But instead they did this multiple times" and again, tries to make it sound nefarious.
Of course they tried it multiple times, deleting the batch each time until they got it to run without error. As the process calls for. Again, neither of them pointedly says anything illegal happened.
The second instance, she tried to say ballots were being brought in on vans, in the guise of food for the workers. She then states she never at any point witnessed anything come out of the vans.
I don't have to insult your intelligence, you just did.
Part of the balancing process is that the number of ballots counted must equal voter signatures on the roster for those who voted in person, plus the signature envelopes of those who voted by mail. If there were thousands of ballots run through counting machines multiple times, how would the lack of signatures be overlooked and not accounted for ?Here sworn affidavit clearly lays it out that she saw several 50 ballot batches get scanned multiple times including specifically a time where she needed to unjam a machine that read a batch count of > 400 (at least 8 batch scans). Regardless, it doesn't seem like these first hand witnesses get any real consideration from judges.
Salzie would prefer to listen to a lefty lawyer tell him that there wasn't....
Lawyers in individual fraud cases are going to argue narrowly. That's how you win. I can't read the paywalled article. I would never pay a cent for an MSM article. Toilet paper for the most part. They will find credible fraud so prepare those ears.
Then the libs should call for making the audit as public and transparent as possible. They're doing the exact opposite -- Fall in line now and accept Hiden as your leader, or you'll be sorry... It's pretty simple, the Reds want fair elections where every legal vote is counted; the libs want to hide the elections and keep people from looking into the validity.You'd dimiss the audit as a deep state cover up, whats the point?
This group in Virginia has some really interesting data on the voting records. If you want to learn more about how voting can be rigged, check out their data analysis. This is just one of many snapshots of the VR data.They should scan every ballot in, and we can all look at them. All of them.
This group in Virginia has some really interesting data on the voting records. If you want to learn more about how voting can be rigged, check out their data analysis. This is just one of many snapshots of the VR data.