Dominion Election Software

Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
23,005
Reaction score
1,587
Points
113
Chairman of the Federal Election Commission says he believes there is wide spread voter fraud.

 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
42,517
Reaction score
3,402
Points
113
I've said over and over, if they find credible fraud, I am all ears. So far all we have is hearsay and conspiracy theories.

Trumps lawyers are admitting as much in court, they have nothing.
Lawyers in individual fraud cases are going to argue narrowly. That's how you win. I can't read the paywalled article. I would never pay a cent for an MSM article. Toilet paper for the most part. They will find credible fraud so prepare those ears.
 

WhoFellDownTheGopherHole?

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
2,391
Reaction score
1,172
Points
113
IT Contractor for Dominion Ballott Counting Software Co. Exposes Massive Ballott Fraud in Detroit Michigan

** Did you actually watch this? 😂😅🤣😆 **


She brings up all sorts of things, but never claims that anything was actually done illegally. The first one is all distraction to make you think something happened, when all they do it outlay the process. When describing what happens when there is an error on a ballot in a batch of 50 she says 'the process would be to take out the ballots, put the error on top and then delete the batch and rescan them." She then nods her head as if there is something dubious is implied, when all she did was describe a process. Then the interviewer says "But instead they did this multiple times" and again, tries to make it sound nefarious.

Of course they tried it multiple times, deleting the batch each time until they got it to run without error. As the process calls for. Again, neither of them pointedly says anything illegal happened.

The second instance, she tried to say ballots were being brought in on vans, in the guise of food for the workers. She then states she never at any point witnessed anything come out of the vans.



I don't have to insult your intelligence, you just did. :p
 

WhoFellDownTheGopherHole?

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
2,391
Reaction score
1,172
Points
113
Odd that Senator Pat Tomey (R-PA) doesn't agree with you Boo

Pennsylvania's Republican senator shoots down Trump's claims of voter fraud


BUT I'M SURE YOU KNOW MORE THAN THAT RINO DOES, LOL

Did you also miss this LBGA?

Postal worker admits fabricating Trump-pushed claims of voter fraud in Pa., House panel says


From the article -


A postal worker in Pennsylvania has admitted to making up explosive accusations about mail-in voting irregularities in the 2020 election that were picked up by supporters of President Donald Trump as supposed evidence of fraud, according to congressional investigators.

Richard Hopkins, a U.S. Postal Service employee in Erie, Pa., first alleged last week that his supervisor had instructed staff to backdate mail-in ballots cast after Election Day in order to get them counted — which would be illegal.

The claims were seized on by the Trump campaign and congressional Republicans as proof that Trump had good reason not to concede the election to President-elect Joe Biden — especially since Hopkins had signed a sworn affidavit to certify his allegations.

But Hopkins admitted to investigators from the U.S. Postal Service inspector general’s office on Monday that his allegations were false, according to the House Oversight Committee.

“IG investigators informed committee staff today that they interviewed Hopkins on Friday, but that Hopkins RECANTED HIS ALLEGATIONS yesterday and did not explain why he signed a false affidavit,” the Democrat-led committee tweeted late Tuesday.

I'm sure we can expect some Tomey slander to pop up pretty quick. There has to be SOME way to discredit him.
 

FormerFatOL

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
83
Reaction score
82
Points
18
** Did you actually watch this? 😂😅🤣😆 **


She brings up all sorts of things, but never claims that anything was actually done illegally. The first one is all distraction to make you think something happened, when all they do it outlay the process. When describing what happens when there is an error on a ballot in a batch of 50 she says 'the process would be to take out the ballots, put the error on top and then delete the batch and rescan them." She then nods her head as if there is something dubious is implied, when all she did was describe a process. Then the interviewer says "But instead they did this multiple times" and again, tries to make it sound nefarious.

Of course they tried it multiple times, deleting the batch each time until they got it to run without error. As the process calls for. Again, neither of them pointedly says anything illegal happened.

The second instance, she tried to say ballots were being brought in on vans, in the guise of food for the workers. She then states she never at any point witnessed anything come out of the vans.



I don't have to insult your intelligence, you just did. :p
Here sworn affidavit clearly lays it out that she saw several 50 ballot batches get scanned multiple times including specifically a time where she needed to unjam a machine that read a batch count of > 400 (at least 8 batch scans). Regardless, it doesn't seem like these first hand witnesses get any real consideration from judges.

https://parler.com/post/5c6fca13e1714fcc84356c485e592382
 

bigticket1

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2011
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
130
Points
63
Here sworn affidavit clearly lays it out that she saw several 50 ballot batches get scanned multiple times including specifically a time where she needed to unjam a machine that read a batch count of > 400 (at least 8 batch scans). Regardless, it doesn't seem like these first hand witnesses get any real consideration from judges.

https://parler.com/post/5c6fca13e1714fcc84356c485e592382
Part of the balancing process is that the number of ballots counted must equal voter signatures on the roster for those who voted in person, plus the signature envelopes of those who voted by mail. If there were thousands of ballots run through counting machines multiple times, how would the lack of signatures be overlooked and not accounted for ?
 

Wally

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
1,212
Points
113
The Dominion's deal with Cardassia was devastating to Federation, but it was the Breen that really pushed things in favor of the Founders.
Good thing the Federation always wins.... ALWAYS
 

salzie

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
3,029
Reaction score
629
Points
113
Salzie would prefer to listen to a lefty lawyer tell him that there wasn't....
again, the lawsuits have been thrown out due to no proof

if there is so much proof, why are the lawyers having hard time finding actual proof they can go to court with?

You've still yet to offer anything but conjecture and conspiracy theory
 

Wally

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
1,212
Points
113
YOUR new prez has a PLAN!!!!!!!!!
Its too late the Trump virus is out of control. Its funny how the hoax people I know in real life are starting to think this Covid thing might be serious.😆😆😆
 

salzie

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
3,029
Reaction score
629
Points
113
Lawyers in individual fraud cases are going to argue narrowly. That's how you win. I can't read the paywalled article. I would never pay a cent for an MSM article. Toilet paper for the most part. They will find credible fraud so prepare those ears.
Trump team has lost every time, because they can't even prove narrow fraud, much less wide spread
 

Livingat45north

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
4,725
Reaction score
1,599
Points
113
If Hiden and the libs wanted to unify the country, they'd be all in favor of doing complete audits to make sure everyone believes the vote was legitimate. But, you don't hear those words at all from the libs. I wonder why?

1605302712022.png
 

salzie

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
3,029
Reaction score
629
Points
113
If Hiden and the libs wanted to unify the country, they'd be all in favor of doing complete audits to make sure everyone believes the vote was legitimate. But, you don't hear those words at all from the libs. I wonder why?

View attachment 10420

You'd dimiss the audit as a deep state cover up, whats the point?
 

Livingat45north

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
4,725
Reaction score
1,599
Points
113
You'd dimiss the audit as a deep state cover up, whats the point?
Then the libs should call for making the audit as public and transparent as possible. They're doing the exact opposite -- Fall in line now and accept Hiden as your leader, or you'll be sorry... It's pretty simple, the Reds want fair elections where every legal vote is counted; the libs want to hide the elections and keep people from looking into the validity.

1605303025551.png
 

saintpaulguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
6,575
Reaction score
1,642
Points
113
They should scan every ballot in, and we can all look at them. All of them.
 

Livingat45north

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
4,725
Reaction score
1,599
Points
113
They should scan every ballot in, and we can all look at them. All of them.
This group in Virginia has some really interesting data on the voting records. If you want to learn more about how voting can be rigged, check out their data analysis. This is just one of many snapshots of the VR data.

 

Livingat45north

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
4,725
Reaction score
1,599
Points
113
A chart showing the 2am to 6am ballots for Hiden magically coming in around 80% in his favor...

 

Wally

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
1,212
Points
113
This group in Virginia has some really interesting data on the voting records. If you want to learn more about how voting can be rigged, check out their data analysis. This is just one of many snapshots of the VR data.

Probably because they counted the mail in ballots last idiot. Trumptards listened to the dipshit in chief that they shouldn't vote by mail.
 

Livingat45north

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
4,725
Reaction score
1,599
Points
113
It's pretty simple, Hiden will never be viewed as the legitimate winner by 70 million-plus people in America unless there is a full and complete audit and review. Since the libs are emphatic that there was absolutely zero fraud, they should welcome this and be totally on board with making it happen.
 
Top Bottom