All Things Impeachment Inquiry

KillerGopherFan

Active member
Attacking Bill Taylor a GWB and Trump appointee as a leftist Deep Stater out to get poor Don is so pathetic and desperate. The Trumpsters have nothing. Grasping at straws to protect their deity.
You’re a joke. You want to impeach a president, overturn a national election, based on second and thirdhand testimony from an obvious partisan. Without the accused having a chance to refute the testimony or taking the word of others that were more closely involved in the conversations than the partisan witness.

You’d be great in a lynch mob.
 

KillerGopherFan

Active member
On one hand we have a guy who:
- Made his living running hotels
- Got his job by donating $1M to Trump's inaugural
- Had a job that had no reason to be involved in the Ukraine

On the other hand we have a guy who:
- Graduated West Point
- Was in the 101st Airborne in Vietnam
- Was appointed by George Bush to be Ambassador to Ukraine
- Was kept on by Obama as Ambassador to Ukraine
- Was appointed by Trump himself to be Chargé d'affaires in Ukraine


Yeah, it's very obvious the second guy is more likely to be biased
Wow. We’re just supposed to trust a person’s testimony b/c they have a terrific background? Facts don’t matter. The hearsay testimony of the witness doesn’t matter. Direct rebuttal evidence by multiple other witnesses doesn’t matter. The secrecy of the hearing doesn’t matter.

Just believe what you’re told by Dem congressmen as they come out of the hearing room telling you it was terrible for Trump.

Why are these hearings in secret? Why can’t congressmen talk about what was testified to?

Republicans say they destroyed Taylor’s testimony in 90 seconds, but they’re not allowed to say how or they be in violation of the hearing rules.

You don’t care. Throw due process out the window and we can get Trump.

And oh btw, have you heard that William Barr has an impeccable background, but you all think he’s a liar and a hack. Funny how experience and reputation only matter when it’s someone against Trump.
 
Last edited:

bga1

Active member
You’re a joke. You want to impeach a president, overturn a national election, based on second and thirdhand testimony from an obvious partisan. Without the accused having a chance to refute the testimony or taking the word of others that were more closely involved in the conversations than the partisan witness.

You’d be great in a lynch mob.
Howie is told by his masters that he should still be concerned that Barr gave a summary to the Mueller report to the American public while the full report awaited review for classified information. Now based on a Taylor's opening statement which lacks any challenge, because the Dems refuse to allow the whole proceeding to be public, Howie is certain that the President should be impeached based on Taylor's opinion. This is it! Howie has him now!
 

KillerGopherFan

Active member
Btw, you can’t have a quid pro quo without a quo.

As has already been pointed out, Ukraine didn’t know about aid being withheld until August 29. It has been repeated numerous times, Trump said “no quid pro quos of any kind”.

Zelenskyy said he never felt pressured. Zelenskyy didn’t restart the Burisma investigation in August. The aid was restored before any investigation or announcement was made.

Virtually everything that Taylor claimed the Trump administration was trying to do, wasn’t done.
 

KillerGopherFan

Active member
Howie is told by his masters that he should still be concerned that Barr gave a summary to the Mueller report to the American public while the full report awaited review for classified information. Now based on a Taylor's opening statement which lacks any challenge, because the Dems refuse to allow the whole proceeding to be public, Howie is certain that the President should be impeached based on Taylor's opinion. This is it! Howie has him now!
Howie has a very low bar on things he desperately wants to believe. Just tell him what he wants to hear and done.
 
You’re a joke. You want to impeach a president, overturn a national election, based on second and thirdhand testimony from an obvious partisan. Without the accused having a chance to refute the testimony or taking the word of others that were more closely involved in the conversations than the partisan witness.

You’d be great in a lynch mob.
And there it is. Sure didn't take long to incorporate that into your posts.
 
Howie has a very low bar on things he desperately wants to believe. Just tell him what he wants to hear and done.
What's amusing is that you and all of the other sycophants are willing to believe all of your preposterous Deep State™ horse**** but won't even think about any of this testimony simply because the orange one was stupid enough (for once) to actually use the phrase "quid pro quo". You're a joke. A hateful, racist jackass.
 

justthefacts

Active member
Wow. We’re just supposed to trust a person’s testimony b/c they have a terrific background? Facts don’t matter. The hearsay testimony of the witness doesn’t matter. Direct rebuttal evidence by multiple other witnesses doesn’t matter. The secrecy of the hearing doesn’t matter.

Just believe what you’re told by Dem congressmen as they come out of the hearing room telling you it was terrible for Trump.

Why are these hearings in secret? Why can’t congressmen talk about what was testified to?

Republicans say they destroyed Taylor’s testimony in 90 seconds, but they’re not allowed to say how or they be in violation of the hearing rules.

You don’t care. Throw due process out the window and we can get Trump.

And oh btw, have you heard that William Barr has an impeccable background, but you all think he’s a liar and a hack. Funny how experience and reputation only matter when it’s someone against Trump.
I'm not the one saying anyone has a strictly political agenda. Those charges have been levied against Taylor, as the only explanation for anyone ever opposing Trump is that they are DeepState NeverTrumper. No, I'm simply pointing out that other than having said something that ran counter to Trump's interest, there's no reason whatsoever to believe Taylor is politically-motivated.
 
Sure. Look at the hypocrisy:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/flashback-top-dems-including-nadler-called-clinton-impeachment-lynching

Biden, Nadler, Rep Meeks and Rep Davis called the Clinton impeachment a “lynching”.

But...but...it’s different.
Actually, he apologized for using that word. Said it was wrong. Think the orange one would ever do that? You're a joke.

The truth is you'll never actually defend our joke of a President, because he's beyond defending. You, being the racist dickhole that you are, love it. All you'll ever have is "whataboutism".
 
Last edited:

KillerGopherFan

Active member
What's amusing is that you and all of the other sycophants are willing to believe all of your preposterous Deep State™ horse**** but won't even think about any of this testimony simply because the orange one was stupid enough (for once) to actually use the phrase "quid pro quo". You're a joke. A hateful, racist jackass.
Hearsay isn’t allowed in a courtroom. Neither is secrecy. But for impeachment of Trump, no problem.

Ignorant hack!
 

KillerGopherFan

Active member
Except this isn't a ****ing courtroom, something you and the other sycophants somehow don't understand. If you want to go back and take a basic civics class it may help.
That is really a stupid argument. The courtroom rules are made for reasons of justice and fairness. So you’re saying justice and fairness don’t matter outside the courtroom. Really really stupid.

Embarrassingly stupid.
 

MplsGopher

Well-known member
That is really a stupid argument. The courtroom rules are made for reasons of justice and fairness. So you’re saying justice and fairness don’t matter outside the courtroom. Really really stupid.

Embarrassingly stupid.
Except that ... every third grader can tell you plainly that "the world ain't fair". Because it's not.

So ... yeah, actually .... justice and (legal) fairness only have context in the formal settings of the law.


You can have and try to live by your own moral code, of course ... but you have no authority to claim that it is objective and must be respected by anyone else.
 

MplsGopher

Well-known member
Yes, getting called racist nonstop all the time is really effective, and I'm sure has triggered KGF.
We all that Trump being elected somehow triggered the bigots to think that -- finally -- they can come out of the closet about their bigoted views.

Now is the time to be out in the open with your discrimination! It might be the last time in our history ...
 

KillerGopherFan

Active member
Yes, getting called racist nonstop all the time is really effective, and I'm sure has triggered KGF.
I’m racist b/c I used the same term as Biden, Nadler, and several others. Hahaha

What would lefties do without double standards?

It really sucks when they get caught in their own traps.
 
Top Bottom