2020 Democrat Presidential Candidate News...

Gopherguy0723

Active member
She needs to stop whining. It's not rigged. People simply don't support her, so she has sour grapes. It hurts, but it's true.

She can either keep trying to gather support without whining or drop out anytime and support someone in her party who could be the nominee because it's not going to be her.

This rigged bullsh!t is 4-year-old stuff, and we already have one of those in the Oval Office. We don't need more.
 

Section2

Well-known member
She needs to stop whining. It's not rigged. People simply don't support her, so she has sour grapes. It hurts, but it's true.

She can either keep trying to gather support without whining or drop out anytime and support someone in her party who could be the nominee because it's not going to be her.

This rigged bullsh!t is 4-year-old stuff, and we already have one of those in the Oval Office. We don't need more.
It was rigged last time. What makes you think it isn't this time? She's not going to be the nominee, rigged or not, agree with you there.
 

MplsGopher

Well-known member
What a whiny baby. Waaaaaaa people don’t support me! Therefore it’s rigged!! Waaaaaaaa!

She ain’t getting my vote, with that nonsense. That’s not a leader.
 

Livingat45north

Well-known member
She needs to stop whining. It's not rigged. People simply don't support her, so she has sour grapes. It hurts, but it's true.

She can either keep trying to gather support without whining or drop out anytime and support someone in her party who could be the nominee because it's not going to be her.

This rigged bullsh!t is 4-year-old stuff, and we already have one of those in the Oval Office. We don't need more.
Totally rigged last go round, totally rigged this time as well. Warren is the nominee, and has been since she agreed to not run against Hillary in 2016. Everything was put in place for her to win, it was the trade-off for her agreeing to wait. And the fact that it's rigged is perfectly legal, the D's can use whatever process they want to pick their nominee. For the D's, the Super Delegates pick the nominee, not the voters. For the R's it's the voters. Two very different approaches, both with their upside and downsides. The D's have learned to use the R's approach to their advantage, for example all the huge D campaign contributions to Judge Roy Moore during the R primaries led to him winning that primary and a D winning the election (for Jeff Session's open senate seat in Alabama). It's all part of the political process...
 

Section2

Well-known member
It was rigged in 2016. The cry of rigging 2020 is nothing but sour grapes and acting like a petulant child. Grow up.
That's awfully convenient. I would think all Democrats would be receptive to cries of rigging in 2020, given that it happened last time. Unless you don't care that it's rigged.
 

howeda7

Well-known member
She needs to stop whining. It's not rigged. People simply don't support her, so she has sour grapes. It hurts, but it's true.

She can either keep trying to gather support without whining or drop out anytime and support someone in her party who could be the nominee because it's not going to be her.

This rigged bullsh!t is 4-year-old stuff, and we already have one of those in the Oval Office. We don't need more.
She's polling at 0.8%. Are the polls rigged? Drop out or run in the GOP primary. They seem to like her. I bet she could beat Sanford and Weld. She'd certainly get more than 0.8%.
 

short ornery norwegian

Well-known member
Dammit, we have to go back to the days of honest elections.

When the candidates were chosen by a room full of old white guys with beards smoking cigars and making deals.

A process, after all, that resulted in Abraham Lincoln becoming President. A lot of people seem to think he did a pretty good job.

As far as Tulsi, she could campaign in a thong and pasties, and she might get her polls up over 1%. It would give the fellas something to look at on the internet.
 

Section2

Well-known member
Dammit, we have to go back to the days of honest elections.

When the candidates were chosen by a room full of old white guys with beards smoking cigars and making deals.

A process, after all, that resulted in Abraham Lincoln becoming President. A lot of people seem to think he did a pretty good job.

As far as Tulsi, she could campaign in a thong and pasties, and she might get her polls up over 1%. It would give the fellas something to look at on the internet.
Not misogynistic.
 

Ogee Oglethorpe

Over Macho Grande?
I would imagine anyone that gets the 24/7 attention from CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, NY Times, et al that is afforded to Warren and Biden and even the Bern would be polling really well right now.
 

bga1

Well-known member
She needs to stop whining. It's not rigged. People simply don't support her, so she has sour grapes. It hurts, but it's true.

She can either keep trying to gather support without whining or drop out anytime and support someone in her party who could be the nominee because it's not going to be her.

This rigged bullsh!t is 4-year-old stuff, and we already have one of those in the Oval Office. We don't need more.
Actually I think you are talking to the Democrat party about 2016. They still haven't really gotten over that one - still trying to change the result. The country be damned! We want power!
 

Section2

Well-known member
Well, you’d be wrong. No surprise
how on earth is he wrong? It's also the reason Trump is president, those same MSM gave Trump multiples of any other candidate and resulted in him winning. Are we really so naive to think that the power brokers aren't also gatekeepers? Howie is, are you also?
 

Section2

Well-known member
Poor Liz with another whopper of a lie, central to her stump speech, now crumbling again. Maybe she's just not a victim at all? That won't sell to Dems. Gotta be a victim. That's the currency. First the 2007 video. Explained away in a pathetic statement. Now another in 2011 destroys the explanation. It was a lie. She wasn't fired for being pregnant. And further, there is actual documentation stating that the board accepted her resignation regretfully. It was legal at the time to fire a woman for being pregnant, so no reason to sugar coat things if it weren't true. Read below: not zerohedge, so Howie will read with an open mind.

https://www.mediaite.com/news/watch-elizabeth-warrens-2011-claim-about-pregnancy-discrimination-appears-to-undermine-current-explanation/
 

theczar

Member
Poor Liz with another whopper of a lie, central to her stump speech, now crumbling again. Maybe she's just not a victim at all? That won't sell to Dems. Gotta be a victim. That's the currency. First the 2007 video. Explained away in a pathetic statement. Now another in 2011 destroys the explanation. It was a lie. She wasn't fired for being pregnant. And further, there is actual documentation stating that the board accepted her resignation regretfully. It was legal at the time to fire a woman for being pregnant, so no reason to sugar coat things if it weren't true. Read below: not zerohedge, so Howie will read with an open mind.

https://www.mediaite.com/news/watch-elizabeth-warrens-2011-claim-about-pregnancy-discrimination-appears-to-undermine-current-explanation/
Closed minds and leftist GHolers quite obviously go hand in hand..
 

Costa Rican Gopher

Mind of a Scientist
Poor Liz with another whopper of a lie, central to her stump speech, now crumbling again. Maybe she's just not a victim at all? That won't sell to Dems. Gotta be a victim. That's the currency. First the 2007 video. Explained away in a pathetic statement. Now another in 2011 destroys the explanation. It was a lie. She wasn't fired for being pregnant. And further, there is actual documentation stating that the board accepted her resignation regretfully. It was legal at the time to fire a woman for being pregnant, so no reason to sugar coat things if it weren't true. Read below: not zerohedge, so Howie will read with an open mind.

https://www.mediaite.com/news/watch-elizabeth-warrens-2011-claim-about-pregnancy-discrimination-appears-to-undermine-current-explanation/
Ok, so she wasn't actually fired for being pregnant, but she IS an Indian and her parents DID have to elope because of racial prejudice.
 

KillerGopherFan

Active member
Article on Lie-a-watha, lyin Joe Biden, and other lying lefties:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/10/elizabeth-warren-is-jussie-smollett/

Elizabeth Warren has a moving story about being fired from a teaching job because she was pregnant, a story that perfectly complements her political narrative that she is the tribune and champion of those who have been treated unfairly by the powerful. Joe Biden has a moving — and horrifying — story about his wife and daughter being killed by a drunk driver, a story that similarly could not have been designed more perfectly to bolster his political image as a man who can be counted on to soldier on in the face of adversity.

Of course, neither story is true...

...Similarly, people are killed by drunk drivers every day in this country. Joe Biden’s wife and daughter were not among them, in spite of his libelous claims that they lost their lives in an accident involving an irresponsible truck driver who, as Biden put it, “drank his lunch.” The man who oversaw that investigation, Delaware Superior Court judge Jerome O. Herlihy, repeatedly has confirmed that there is no evidence alcohol was involved. The survivors of the driver, who has since passed away, have publicly asked Biden to stop telling this lie and besmirching the memory of their father. Investigators at the time determined that the accident was not even the other driver’s fault — Mrs. Biden seems to have driven accidentally into the path of the truck.

But what’s a lie about some nobody in Delaware in the service of the “greater truth,” which is somehow allied to the political ambitions of Joe Biden?...
 
Top Bottom