Here’s another after another minute or so. USAToday editor twitting:
So, they stated the obvious, visible to all. Do you have the moment he became not white?
So, we are in agreement he’s white? Earlier in this thread, it seemed his Muslimness and Syrianness made him non white.
Admitting ones own upbringing of privilege and subconscious racism, is a good start.
This is a stocker level response. The cartoon said “a white gunman killed people”. Then you said prove it. I proved it. Now you move the goal posts. The moment he became non-white was when the police revealed his name. And we know, we don’t dare say ‘a Muslim killed people’.
No. Your cartoon suggests a backpedal, after it is discovered the man was Syrian, not white. Proving he is white is easy, as it is pretty visible. Can you show the change after he became Syrian or non white? And show that it was his non white status that gave everyone pause?
I'm not sure about the AP, but in the QOP stylebook you can look under "s@#thole countries" and "non-s#^thole countries."
Graduate HS, don't have children out of wedlock, find Jesus. It's so simple!
The narrative changed. It’s pretty simple.
It’s pretty simple. If you don’t know a suspect’s name, or anything about him, you go by a description. After that, you use his name. From the general to the specific as information allows. It isn’t a liberal conspiracy.
Reality, accuracy, reality, accuracy.............
Why doest that description include skin color only some of the time, even when it is clear what skin color the perp has?
Sometimes people are trying to be color blind to the detriment of public safety, and that is stupid. I also roll my eyes at African American or Hispanic for completely unknown persons. When the public safety is best served by information easily seen instead of a guess at heritage,it should be done quickly and accurately. As information becomes available it can be added.
And yet, time and again, it isn't done quickly or accurately. We know why. You wont admit it.
The biggest bigot on the board accusing others of stereotyping. Unbelievable.
Eat before going to vote. It’s so simple!
Apparently because Obama?
Who said it’s a “conspiracy”? Continue to move the goal posts.
Huh? What label was applied incorrectly and then changed?
Ok, you gave me an assignment to prove my point and I gave you two examples. Now here’s your assignment
Wrong again, Batman.......
No, you found what exactly would be expected. Going from the general to the specific. If you can find a reference to his non whiteness, after he is named, you might have an item of interest.
I've already said it sometimes happens, and that it is stupid, as an attempt at color blindness. I'm not sure what it is you are wanting here. Sometimes well intended people do actual harm.
Hillary Clinton, Jeffery Epstein, the Illuminati, and Hollywood.
