To be clear, I was not at all impressed with the offensive performance. It was horrible, and has been for the last two games and many other times this year. However, Souhan's article is Strib cherry picking at it's best.
As mentioned earlier, a lot of people were extremely frustrated with Dunbar last year, thought the spread could not work here, and were happy to see him gone. Now, Dunbar is an offensive genius who never should have been fired? Our offense last year was pathetic with the same players, plus Decker for the whole year. I am not sticking up for Fisch necessarily, but at worst our offense is the same as last year, and in my opinion it is better than last year.
And, Souhan dismisses the defense's performance as "Iowa, a limited team that kicked a field goal on its first drive and spent the rest of the game trying to run out the clock". The same team that took Ohio State to overtime in Ohio last week, and was on top of the Big Ten for much of the season? I realize they are not a powerful offensive team, but they certainly have enough weapons and had enough opportunities to put up more than 12 points.
Finally, this one really gets me "In terms of offensive football, Brewster had the boulder at the top of the mountain and shoved it over the edge."
Seriously, this may be true if Brew inherited Barber or Maroney to run behind Setterstrom and Eslinger with an experienced Qb at the helm. Instead, he inherited very little talent offensively and began with a redshirt freshman QB and very little experience at anywhere other than WR.
Anyway, I know it is a lot of wasted energy to criticize a Strib article, but it also seems like Souhan's comments echo many on this board. The cherry-pciking and revisionist history are very frustrating.