Tater
f.k.a. "Tubtastic"
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2008
- Messages
- 1,144
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 38
I don't think anyone can reasonably dispute that the local major sports media outlets (strib, ppress, KFAN, etc...) are, at the very least, more often negative than positive in their coverage of the Gopher football program. Whether such coverage is deserved or not is a whole other discussion.
I generally don't let the media coverage bug me (other than the fact that there is a significant lack of coverage of Gopher football). That being said, the Strib's latest article on the Texas series cancellation did give me pause.
It is entitled: "Gophers lose home-and-home series with Texas" -- isn't the real story here that Texas backed out of the series due to its greedy-ass money grab policies? Wouldn't a better title be "Texas cancels home-and-home series with Minnesota" or "Texas backs out of home-and-home series" or "Texas sucks N*tz".
Maybe I'm just reading GH too much but the title seems overly negative to the Gophers, suggesting to those who don't look into the actual story behind the cancellation that the Gophers screwed something up.
Just venting.
I generally don't let the media coverage bug me (other than the fact that there is a significant lack of coverage of Gopher football). That being said, the Strib's latest article on the Texas series cancellation did give me pause.
It is entitled: "Gophers lose home-and-home series with Texas" -- isn't the real story here that Texas backed out of the series due to its greedy-ass money grab policies? Wouldn't a better title be "Texas cancels home-and-home series with Minnesota" or "Texas backs out of home-and-home series" or "Texas sucks N*tz".
Maybe I'm just reading GH too much but the title seems overly negative to the Gophers, suggesting to those who don't look into the actual story behind the cancellation that the Gophers screwed something up.
Just venting.