Chip: 'Collective' is the new buzzword in college sports, and the Gophers need one

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
60,774
Reaction score
16,183
Points
113
Per Chip:

The university is not permitted to handle NIL deals for athletes. That job is increasingly being outsourced to collectives, a term that fans should get familiar with because collectives are popping up around the country by the week and securing endorsement deals and other moneymaking opportunities for college athletes.

The Gophers need one.

Collectives typically are formed by boosters and supporters of programs. They act independently of the athletic department, though compliance offices provide education in explaining NIL rules and what forms of income opportunities will be deemed permissible.

Nearly 40 schools have at least one collective, and industry experts expect that all Power Five schools will have one by the end of the year. A few schools already have multiple collectives.

Why is everything unfolding so quickly? Recruiting, as always, and the pressure to keep up with rivals.

The NCAA prohibits using NIL as enticements in recruiting (wink, wink), but surprise, that's a rule being ignored.

One Division I coach told me that recruits are asking about NIL opportunities and whether the school has a collective. It's become part of the courtship between coach and player, particularly with transfers in the portal who might either have NIL options at their current school or are shopping for the most lucrative opportunity when choosing a new school.

This is the new reality of college sports. People might not like this new reality or the direction that things are headed, but NIL is here to stay.


Go Gophers!!
 




buyFBIb.png
 


Schools absolutely love all this NIL stuff.

Players are defacto getting paid for play. And the school doesn't have to do any of the paying, outside of a scholarship which was always fine with them. The salaries are being provided by boosters and/or companies.
 

It's like the NFL, but without any draft, without any salary caps, and without any other attempts at measures of fairness to ensure a relatively equal playing field between teams.

Just like mom used to make!
 


It's like the NFL, but without any draft, without any salary caps, and without any other attempts at measures of fairness to ensure a relatively equal playing field between teams.

Just like mom used to make!

The most devious move would be for the NCAA (or their "collectives") to start paying players out the wazoo...then end eligibility limits. Voila, huge new nationwide professional football league stocked with players.

That could kill the NFL.
 




It's like the NFL, but without any draft, without any salary caps, and without any other attempts at measures of fairness to ensure a relatively equal playing field between teams.

Just like mom used to make!
Could you imagine what a college draft would look like?

Would it be just power 5 schools or also include Group of 5.

The transfer portal would be free agency.

Youd have to figure out a way to limit all the high ranking prospects going to the former blue bloods
 

As long as the NCAA keeps tract of the number of scholarships awarded, things won’t change much from present day. Yes, Alabama and Ohio State will fight it out for the 5 stars and their collectives will award accordingly. Other helmet schools will work to get what’s left in the top recruits. And the rest of us will fight for left overs. Slight change might be the “the Nebraska “ of college football will get the best of the leftovers but again, they are limited by numbers.
 




Could you imagine what a college draft would look like?

Would it be just power 5 schools or also include Group of 5.

The transfer portal would be free agency.

Youd have to figure out a way to limit all the high ranking prospects going to the former blue bloods
I think a P5 draft would be a great thing, frankly. If you could get everyone to sign up for it.

And then require the recruit to only be eligible at their drafted school for the first three calendar years, no matter what (including coaching changes), barring only exceptional circumstances (family health/emergency).

If they want to leave earlier than that, be our guest at a G5 or FCS.

In year four and/or five, feel free to use your free transfer and play right away at a new P5 school. Again though, the three year rule applies. You would not be allowed to do year 1 at drafted P5, year 2 at a G5, and then transfer back to another P5 in year 3. You'd have to sit out that year and then be able to play for them in year 4.
 


The most devious move would be for the NCAA (or their "collectives") to start paying players out the wazoo...then end eligibility limits. Voila, huge new nationwide professional football league stocked with players.

That could kill the NFL.

No, because the NFL survives on parity and hope.

The most likely result of this is bad for college football, but who knows.
 

No, because the NFL survives on parity and hope.
Don’t forget the non-stop ESPN knob-slobbering for the NFL.
Their constant promotion is a big driver.
I won’t look, but I can almost guarantee there is a NFL dedicated show on today.
 





Top Bottom