JoeDirt
Active member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2009
- Messages
- 1,170
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 38
I haven't been this excited since the first week of the season.
When Brewster was hired, the admin went on record that the program must be competitive and mediocrity is no longer the standard. Great. Finally!
Yet, for various reasons, they hired a neophyte rather than a proven commodity to accomplish what no one else has done in decades. Huh?? When Holtz left, they hired an assistant with the players full endorsement. Failure. Enter Mason who never won big and often and didn't have the drive to do any better. Failure. And Wacker was sandwiched inbetween. Failure. The UM has been a head coaching graveyard for a long, long time.
FBT's work tells us that all the pieces are now in place to attract a big time Tubby-like coach. Money, stadium, facilities, committment, etc. are there.
After 5 decades of supporting the Gophers and first hand experience of watching a floundering program, this all sounds foreign. I should be excited with the new direction. Right?
How do I spell skeptic?
Good article, but i am not going to buy it until we have a new coach at a press conference. My years of watching Minnesota ineptitude and disappointment has jaded me.
The article screams Treastman!
And, I look at his Big Ten record and I see that he is 26-28 in Big Ten play. He has finished
6th, 7th and 6th in the Big Ten in his three seasons. Is that what everyone is so excieted about?
It is TOUGH to win and finish near the top of the Big Ten more than once in a while.
And, I look at his Big Ten record and I see that he is 26-28 in Big Ten play. He has finished
6th, 7th and 6th in the Big Ten in his three seasons. Is that what everyone is so excieted about?
It is TOUGH to win and finish near the top of the Big Ten more than once in a while.
Pumping and dumping
But what if Bruinicks is an academic version of Brewster? Brings passion, says the right thing but no results.