Teams We Beat - Thread

Donate To GopherHole
Dano564

Dano564

Fleck Superfan
Joined
Feb 26, 2013
Messages
10,135
Reaction score
2,906
Points
113
SDSU won 43-7 over So Utah

Fresno St 34-20 over Sacramento St. who is now 2-2.

Georgia Southern did not play
 

SDSU’s RdShrt Freshman QB who played the entire game at Minnesota but sat out the next two games due to a broken pinky finger suffered in the third quarter of the Minnesota game, returned to the field for the SUU game.
 







cjbfbp said:
AH...good catch. Correction:

Georgia Southern lost in multiple overtimes at Texas State.
Click to expand...

That was Georgia State. The team we played last week, Georgia Southern, did not play this week.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

PitinoFan said:
That was Georgia State. The team we played last week, Georgia Southern, did not play this week.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Oye ve! I guess I'm having a harder time than I thought keeping these teams straight. Thanks. In any event, that's good because I thought losing to Texas State was pretty bad.
 



Not a single post about how good Sacramento State is? This site is getting lazy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Sacramento Southern is a pretty good team. They’d probably finish near the middle of the PAC12.
 

Spoofin said:
Not a single post about how good Sacramento State is? This site is getting lazy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Well, you got me curious. They opened the season with a lopsided win over Southern Oregon. I wasn't aware they had a football program, but you learn something new everyday. They then lost 19-7 at Arizona St (who won at MSU by 3 the next week). Then they beat Northern Colorado 50-0. I wondered how good Northern Colorado was, so I checked. Not very. They lost 59-17 to Washington St the previous week. What does it all mean? I have no idea.
 

It means all 3 teams won ten games last year and are championship teams.. right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 




AtTheLibrary said:
It means all 3 teams won ten games last year and are championship teams.. right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Of all the nonsense PJ says, that line is up at the top. St. John’s won 12 games last year and were champions. Guess they “know how to win” as well. Lucky we don’t have to play them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Spoofin said:
Of all the nonsense PJ says, that line is up at the top. St. John’s won 12 games last year and were champions. Guess they “know how to win” as well. Lucky we don’t have to play them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Naw, culture, habits, what a team will accept absolutely makes a difference in teams.
Some teams are definitely easier to beat than others based on who they are. PJ’s observations are valid. I agree with him.
Some teams are comfortable losing, it becomes a habit.
All three of our opponents were well coached and used to winning...hence harder to beat.
 

60's Guy said:
Naw, culture, habits, what a team will accept absolutely makes a difference in teams.
Some teams are definitely easier to beat than others based on who they are. PJ’s observations are valid. I agree with him.
Some teams are comfortable losing, it becomes a habit.
All three of our opponents were well coached and used to winning...<b>hence harder to beat.</b>
Click to expand...

Harder than who? Bottom Tier Sun Belt Teams?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Spoofin said:
Harder than who? Bottom Tier Sun Belt Teams?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You don’t think it is harder to beat people who are accustomed to winning and have developed decent habits than teams who have grown accustomed to losing and have developed habits of finding ways to lose?

Do you think winning and losing is random?
Do you thinking winning and losing is based purely off talent ratings?

I guess I’m not sure what you are arguing Spoofin. What are you arguing?
 

Some guy said:
You don’t think it is harder to beat people who are accustomed to winning and have developed decent habits than teams who have grown accustomed to losing and have developed habits of finding ways to lose?

Do you think winning and losing is random?
Do you thinking winning and losing is based purely off talent ratings?

I guess I’m not sure what you are arguing Spoofin. What are you arguing?
Click to expand...

He is usually not sure what he is arguing. He likes to be an instigator and it works.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk
 

Some guy said:
You don’t think it is harder to beat people who are accustomed to winning and have developed decent habits than teams who have grown accustomed to losing and have developed habits of finding ways to lose?

Do you think winning and losing is random?
Do you thinking winning and losing is based purely off talent ratings?

I guess I’m not sure what you are arguing Spoofin. What are you arguing?
Click to expand...

I think it would be easier for us to beat St. Johns than it would be for us to beat Rutgers.
 

Bob_Loblaw said:
I think it would be easier for us to beat St. Johns than it would be for us to beat Rutgers.
Click to expand...

Sure, and Eden Prairie would be easier than St Johns. But, I don’t think dragging in the absurd has anything to do with discounting PJs comments about the programs we actually did play.
 

Spoofin said:
Of all the nonsense PJ says, that line is up at the top. St. John’s won 12 games last year and were champions. Guess they “know how to win” as well. Lucky we don’t have to play them.
Click to expand...

Now you're trying to compare Division I teams to Division III teams? Speaking of nonsense...

Spoofin said:
Harder than who? Bottom Tier Sun Belt Teams?
Click to expand...

GSU finished 3rd in their conference last year, 1 game out of first. That's now considered bottom tier? More nonsense from you.
 

60's Guy said:
Sure, and Eden Prairie would be easier than St Johns. But, I don’t think dragging in the absurd has anything to do with discounting PJs comments about the programs we actually did play.
Click to expand...

PJ's pulled this debate into the absurd. He called GSU a championship caliber team. That's absurd.
 


Bob_Loblaw said:
PJ's pulled this debate into the absurd. He called GSU a championship caliber team. That's absurd.
Click to expand...

The program has won 6 national FCS championships. It has won a Sun Belt conference title. They compete for championships...it’s who they are. I don’t see that as absurd.
He does not mean they are a threat to Alabama or Clemson.
Substitute program for team if you don’t get what he’s saying. Plus, he was being a humble winner giving praise to a team that expected to win.
I love to jump on PJ for dumb stuff but this doesn’t qualify as that to me at all.
 

GopherWeatherGuy said:
GSU finished 3rd in their conference last year, 1 game out of first. That's now considered bottom tier? More nonsense from you.
Click to expand...

It helps if you follow along. I was saying WHO is GSU harder to beat than - not calling them bottom tier Sun Belt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

GopherWeatherGuy said:
Now you're trying to compare Division I teams to Division III teams? Speaking of nonsense...
Click to expand...

Sometimes I can only assume you are trying to miss the point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

This is going to be a long thread when he have 14 teams to talk about, in it...
 


You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom