Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Douglas

  1. #1

    Default Douglas

    Had only a few catches but two of them were absolutely crucial to the 95-yard winning drive; 3rd and 30 from our own five, then 4th and eight. Johnson, Bateman, Autmun-Bell and Douglas are as good a group of receivers as I can remember at the U. Now if they could only work in a tight end who can catch and throw a few to running backs (how about a screen pass once in a while?)


  2. #2

    Default

    I believe we have the tight end who can catch the ball. However he needs to learn how to block better according to many posters on this board. Apparently in high school he was able to hold his own. Different animal he found out when playing on a higher playing field. I agree though if we could get some screen passes in there once in a while, it would clearly open up another avenue for the Gophers. Hopefully it will come together.

  3. #3

    Default

    Douglas is good! Really four good WR that would make me tempted to try to pass the ball more often if I was in charge of the offense. I think the reason that might not be a good idea is the pass protection is not that good and that is also possibly why the TE is mostly used for blocking.
    Anyway it could get really fun the if the playmakers can get the ball more often. This year even though the RB corp is deep, it really lacks a home run hitter.

  4. #4

    Default Douglas

    I still wonder if he should have played DB.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Consensus Top 25 Class, 4 of final 5, 80% underclassmen, Youngest Team, 2nd Youngest Team, Best Back-To-Back Classes Ever, 9 Scholarship Seniors, HS Teacher, 8-Hour Radius, Major Paycut

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    188

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spoofin View Post
    I still wonder if he should have played DB.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Was he committed to Oregon as a DB or WR? I vaguely remember him committing to Fleck because of the opportunity to play WR.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noamfromm View Post
    Was he committed to Oregon as a DB or WR? I vaguely remember him committing to Fleck because of the opportunity to play WR.
    DB. Most felt including me his ceiling would be higher at DB.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    31,467
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    He showed up as a clutch player. We have a good QB. We will move the ball better and better as the season progresses.
    Kingdom Warriors

  8. #8

    Default

    If we have 4 WR who are that talented, I wish they would go 10 personnel more often. Start making a lot of catches, you could easily see 5 men in the box. Then you break off a big run.

    I wonder if that's even in the playbook.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Beaver Lodge in Lake Gopher
    Posts
    4,937

    Default

    He should get the ball on fly sweeps and wr screens.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MnplsGopher View Post
    If we have 4 WR who are that talented, I wish they would go 10 personnel more often. Start making a lot of catches, you could easily see 5 men in the box. Then you break off a big run.

    I wonder if that's even in the playbook.
    Agree. For most games, our 4th best receiver is going to be better than their 4th best DB, now if the OL can just give Tanner time...

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Livingat45north View Post
    Agree. For most games, our 4th best receiver is going to be better than their 4th best DB, now if the OL can just give Tanner time...
    OR
    We create plays that are quick hitters and get the ball to the guys that can make plays more often it will loosen the DL and LB’s up a bit. The plays have been created and our team is not utilizing what is available

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleB View Post
    OR
    We create plays that are quick hitters and get the ball to the guys that can make plays more often it will loosen the DL and LB’s up a bit. The plays have been created and our team is not utilizing what is available
    Agree with this, not every throw needs to be a long developing play with a 3 second pocket. Line up in 10 formation and have slant, flat, or quick out plays to keep the defense on their heels.

  13. #13

    Default

    And it’s not like we need to be in 10 all the time. Mix it up with 11 and 12. I’m just saying that I think we’ve been exclusive in 11 and 12 so far, and we have 4 really talented WR.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Kingfield, Minneapolis
    Posts
    1,413

    Default

    He has made some damn good grabs too. Any remember that wild catch against Nebraska last year? I wouldn't be surprised if you didn't since most people probably turned that game off by that point.
    JUST WIN BABY!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New River, AZ
    Posts
    5,873

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MnplsGopher View Post
    If we have 4 WR who are that talented, I wish they would go 10 personnel more often. Start making a lot of catches, you could easily see 5 men in the box. Then you break off a big run.

    I wonder if that's even in the playbook.
    I’m sure they haven’t thought of it.
    Gopher football fan since 1924. DNA-wise.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •