Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 69
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    1,326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Section2 View Post
    I'm fine with saying nothing. I'm not fine with Trump's "both sides"ing it. Hong Kong protesters are in the right, period. I get that there are political calculations, but say nothing, or even a banal statement about the US always standing on the side of liberty and self determination.
    I don't necessarily agree with the first sentence, but agree with the rest.
    Hoping for the best, but expecting the worst.


  2. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KillerGopherFan View Post
    You mean like Obama did with Iran and the Iranian people?
    You're rarely right about anything, Killer. Keep up your ignorant posts. They make for good target shooting.


    Obama toughens his talk on Iran

    June 23, 2009 -- Updated 2247 GMT (0647 HKT)

    President Obama sharpened his language on Iran and stressed the urgency of overhauling the health care system at a news conference Tuesday.

    "The United States and the international community have been appalled and outraged by the threats, beatings and imprisonments of the last few days," the president said, adding that he strongly condemns "these unjust actions."

    Obama's Iran policy has received intense scrutiny amid growing concerns over Tehran's violent crackdown on street protests. The Iranian demonstrators believe the country's June 12 presidential election was a sham.

    Obama earlier called on Iran to stop violent and unjust steps that stifle free speech, but some Republicans have criticized him for not siding more strongly with the demonstrators.

    Asked why he held off on such strong language before, Obama insisted that his tone has been consistent. "Right after the election I said that we had profound concerns about the nature of the election, but that it was not up to us to determine what the outcome was," he said.

    Obama also blasted allegations of some in the Iranian government that the United States is "instigating protests" as "patently false and absurd. This tired strategy of using old tensions to scapegoat other countries won't work anymore in Iran. This is not about the United States and the West; this is about the people of Iran and the future that they -- and only they -- will choose."

    In what was believed to be a first, Obama's comments were available in Farsi, the main language of Iran, through a simultaneous translation on the White House Twitter link.

    Obama said the Iranian regime still has a clear, open path to international acceptance despite the violence of the recent crackdown.

    "There is a peaceful path ... to legitimacy," Obama said, and "we hope they take it." The president said Iran's "faith, sovereignty and traditions" can be accepted while the country's government nevertheless adheres to a set of "international norms and principles" regarding violence and the right of peaceful dissent.

    Asked why he wouldn't spell out any consequences, the president replied, "Because I think that we don't know yet how this thing is going to play out. I know everybody here is on a 24-hour news cycle. I'm not."

    Read complete article at: http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS...nce/index.html

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    1,326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ogee Oglethorpe View Post
    So if we're keeping score here, everyone that I don't agree with are idiots and don't bring up the previous regime's incompetence, although all we heard during Barry's 8 years was "but Bush", "but Bush!", "but Bush!!!"?

    Does that sum it up?
    Do you actually listen to Trump speak? It's not an opinion that he has little knowledge of most world affairs. You guys constantly come on here telling us what brilliant thing Trump is really up to when there is zero evidence that he is anything other than low information.
    Hoping for the best, but expecting the worst.

  4. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omega015 View Post
    Do you actually listen to Trump speak? It's not an opinion that he has little knowledge of most world affairs. You guys constantly come on here telling us what brilliant thing Trump is really up to when there is zero evidence that he is anything other than low information.
    He's President and you are well.... you.

  5. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cruze View Post
    You're rarely right about anything, Killer. Keep up your ignorant posts. They make for good target shooting.


    Obama toughens his talk on Iran

    June 23, 2009 -- Updated 2247 GMT (0647 HKT)

    President Obama sharpened his language on Iran and stressed the urgency of overhauling the health care system at a news conference Tuesday.

    "The United States and the international community have been appalled and outraged by the threats, beatings and imprisonments of the last few days," the president said, adding that he strongly condemns "these unjust actions."

    Obama's Iran policy has received intense scrutiny amid growing concerns over Tehran's violent crackdown on street protests. The Iranian demonstrators believe the country's June 12 presidential election was a sham.

    Obama earlier called on Iran to stop violent and unjust steps that stifle free speech, but some Republicans have criticized him for not siding more strongly with the demonstrators.

    Asked why he held off on such strong language before, Obama insisted that his tone has been consistent. "Right after the election I said that we had profound concerns about the nature of the election, but that it was not up to us to determine what the outcome was," he said.

    Obama also blasted allegations of some in the Iranian government that the United States is "instigating protests" as "patently false and absurd. This tired strategy of using old tensions to scapegoat other countries won't work anymore in Iran. This is not about the United States and the West; this is about the people of Iran and the future that they -- and only they -- will choose."

    In what was believed to be a first, Obama's comments were available in Farsi, the main language of Iran, through a simultaneous translation on the White House Twitter link.

    Obama said the Iranian regime still has a clear, open path to international acceptance despite the violence of the recent crackdown.

    "There is a peaceful path ... to legitimacy," Obama said, and "we hope they take it." The president said Iran's "faith, sovereignty and traditions" can be accepted while the country's government nevertheless adheres to a set of "international norms and principles" regarding violence and the right of peaceful dissent.

    Asked why he wouldn't spell out any consequences, the president replied, "Because I think that we don't know yet how this thing is going to play out. I know everybody here is on a 24-hour news cycle. I'm not."

    Read complete article at: http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS...nce/index.html
    Obama sends 1.8 billion in cash on midnight plane to Iran- gets nothing.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    1,326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bga1 View Post
    He's President and you are well.... you.
    Maybe if I inherit a fortune and tweet racist things all day I can be president someday too. A guy can dream.
    Hoping for the best, but expecting the worst.

  7. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omega015 View Post
    Maybe if I inherit a fortune and tweet racist things all day I can be president someday too. A guy can dream.
    I still don't think it would work for you.

  8. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omega015 View Post
    This is rich coming from you, since nobody on this board has ever had a substantive conversation with you.
    completely false. I've had tons of them. I've tried to have them with you in the past as well. My perspective is just too foreign and triggering.

    BTW, yours and Bad Gopher's avatars are so perfect, kudos.
    Last edited by Section2; 08-13-2019 at 02:07 PM.

  9. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KillerGopherFan View Post
    This is high stakes poker. The public has no idea what the plan is and shouldn’t.

    My guess is that Trump doesn’t want to wreck future trade negotiations and is keeping his involvement to a minimum with this situation. But he will use that as leverage.

    The protesters are giving China fits, as could be expected, since China is trying to speed up their control over Hong Kong, which wasn’t agreed to in the British handover.

    As weak as Trump’s rhetoric sounds on the topic, I think the US will play the good guy enough to make sure China doesn’t go military on the protesters.

    But where the heck is the criticism from the UN and international community about China’s attempt to exceed their influence over HK? Maybe there is and I just haven't heard it. I would think the UK would be raising heck.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Were u day-drinking when u posted this
    ~ Wright about Life - Having fun with words since 1989 ~

  10. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cruze View Post
    You're rarely right about anything, Killer. Keep up your ignorant posts. They make for good target shooting.

    Obama toughens his talk on Iran

    June 23, 2009 -- Updated 2247 GMT (0647 HKT)

    President Obama sharpened his language on Iran and stressed the urgency of overhauling the health care system at a news conference Tuesday.

    "The United States and the international community have been appalled and outraged by the threats, beatings and imprisonments of the last few days," the president said, adding that he strongly condemns "these unjust actions."

    Obama's Iran policy has received intense scrutiny amid growing concerns over Tehran's violent crackdown on street protests. The Iranian demonstrators believe the country's June 12 presidential election was a sham.

    Obama earlier called on Iran to stop violent and unjust steps that stifle free speech, but some Republicans have criticized him for not siding more strongly with the demonstrators.

    Asked why he held off on such strong language before, Obama insisted that his tone has been consistent. "Right after the election I said that we had profound concerns about the nature of the election, but that it was not up to us to determine what the outcome was," he said.

    Obama also blasted allegations of some in the Iranian government that the United States is "instigating protests" as "patently false and absurd. This tired strategy of using old tensions to scapegoat other countries won't work anymore in Iran. This is not about the United States and the West; this is about the people of Iran and the future that they -- and only they -- will choose."

    In what was believed to be a first, Obama's comments were available in Farsi, the main language of Iran, through a simultaneous translation on the White House Twitter link.

    Obama said the Iranian regime still has a clear, open path to international acceptance despite the violence of the recent crackdown.

    "There is a peaceful path ... to legitimacy," Obama said, and "we hope they take it." The president said Iran's "faith, sovereignty and traditions" can be accepted while the country's government nevertheless adheres to a set of "international norms and principles" regarding violence and the right of peaceful dissent.

    Asked why he wouldn't spell out any consequences, the president replied, "Because I think that we don't know yet how this thing is going to play out. I know everybody here is on a 24-hour news cycle. I'm not."

    Read complete article at: http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS...nce/index.html
    Proving talk means very little.

  11. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoodasGold View Post
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Were u day-drinking when u posted this
    I had some Gatorade.

    You’ll have to be more specific in your criticism. Maybe by giving your opinion on the subject?

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    34,536
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KillerGopherFan View Post
    This is high stakes poker. The public has no idea what the plan is and shouldn’t.

    My guess is that Trump doesn’t want to wreck future trade negotiations and is keeping his involvement to a minimum with this situation. But he will use that as leverage.

    The protesters are giving China fits, as could be expected, since China is trying to speed up their control over Hong Kong, which wasn’t agreed to in the British handover.

    As weak as Trump’s rhetoric sounds on the topic, I think the US will play the good guy enough to make sure China doesn’t go military on the protesters.

    But where the heck is the criticism from the UN and international community about China’s attempt to exceed their influence over HK? Maybe there is and I just haven't heard it. I would think the UK would be raising heck.
    Chances are the Administration has no idea what the plan is either. The only people who know are Trump, who's ignorant on foreign affairs and whoever talked to him last. We can only hope that person is the right one, if there are any left.

    We do know that he's shown far more fondness for foreign dictators than anything else. That's likely why we'll say nothing to upset China.

  13. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by howeda7 View Post
    Chances are the Administration has no idea what the plan is either. The only people who know are Trump, who's ignorant on foreign affairs and whoever talked to him last. We can only hope that person is the right one, if there are any left.

    We do know that he's shown far more fondness for foreign dictators than anything else. That's likely why we'll say nothing to upset China.
    You act like Trump had never been outside of the country before he became President. He had far more foreign policy experience dealing with international business than Obama ever had being a Illinois State Senator and brief experience in the US Senate. How’d that “Russian reset” work out? China was allowed to run amok under Obama.

    And I’d trust Sec of State Pompeo over Secretary of States Pompous Kerry or crooked Hillary.

  14. #29

    Default

    The Communist Party is losing legitimacy in China. It is no longer the ideological master over the people. This means that the Communist Party will likely try to crack down on all dissent and then blame ideological competitors. However, if the protesters can move this to the mainland we may see the fall of the Communist regime. China sits on a tipping point.

  15. #30

    Default

    It’s too little too late. China’s stranglehold on it’s citizens by way of data collection, and facial recognition is vast. Scores are kept on citizens. Say something against the regime or even jaywalk your standard of living is downgraded.

    For those who don’t think it could happen here. We’re already seeing it in dem run cities and companies, to a lesser extent to be sure, but it’s the lefts ultimate goal. Total control over the population.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •