Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 55
  1. #1

    Default Supreme Court sides against Exxon in climate case

    Another end run around the Trumpster. The fight against right wing ignorance and hyperpartisanship continues.


    Supreme Court sides against Exxon in climate case

    The Supreme Court on Monday rejected ExxonMobil's bid to review the Massachusetts attorney general's demand for internal documents about what the company knew about climate change over the course of decades.

    Why it matters: The order, issued without comment, enables Attorney General Maura Healey to continue probing whether the oil giant misled investors and consumers about global warming and its effects on Exxon's business.

    The big picture: The case is part of a broader legal effort by some Democratic state officials and investigative journalists to explore the oil industry's internal consideration of climate change.

    New York's AG sued the company in October, alleging Exxon defrauded shareholders by downplaying the expected risk of future climate change policies on its business and assets.


    Read more at: https://www.axios.com/supreme-court-...299e157fe.html
    #resistance


  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cruze View Post
    New York's AG sued the company in October, alleging Exxon defrauded shareholders by downplaying the expected risk of future climate change policies on its business and assets.[/I]
    Completely ridiculous. Democrats are so incredibly dishonest.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Section2 View Post
    Completely ridiculous. Democrats are so incredibly dishonest.
    From October, 2015:

    Exxon Knew about Climate Change almost 40 years ago
    A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformation

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-40-years-ago/
    by station19 - Quit talking stupid.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered User View Post
    From October, 2015:

    Exxon Knew about Climate Change almost 40 years ago
    A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformation

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-40-years-ago/
    Ridiculous. What exactly is the argument? people wouldn't have driven cars if they knew about climate change? Look around you. It's ridiculous from every angle. There is no "settled science" today, much less 40 years ago. Everyone knew the climate was changing 40 years ago.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    The land of cows, colleges and content providers.
    Posts
    5,647
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Section2 View Post
    Completely ridiculous. Democrats are so incredibly dishonest.
    Your intellectual dishonesty is on par with DJT. Are you DJT?
    You can call me Shirley. The "S" has to stand for something!

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Section2 View Post
    Ridiculous. What exactly is the argument? people wouldn't have driven cars if they knew about climate change? Look around you. It's ridiculous from every angle. There is no "settled science" today, much less 40 years ago. Everyone knew the climate was changing 40 years ago.
    Smoking is Good for you. Start today!
    ~ Wright about Life - Having fun with words since 1989 ~

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    The land of cows, colleges and content providers.
    Posts
    5,647
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoodasGold View Post
    Smoking is Good for you. Start today!
    I betcha he vapes like mad.
    You can call me Shirley. The "S" has to stand for something!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    2,560
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Section2 View Post
    Ridiculous. What exactly is the argument? people wouldn't have driven cars if they knew about climate change? Look around you. It's ridiculous from every angle. There is no "settled science" today, much less 40 years ago. Everyone knew the climate was changing 40 years ago.
    No. That's a good way to defraud shareholders. It's a necessary lawsuit. I suspect every oil company will get sued for this.

    These are the new Big Tobacco cases. Big Carbon is in huge trouble.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Section2 View Post
    Ridiculous. What exactly is the argument? people wouldn't have driven cars if they knew about climate change? Look around you. It's ridiculous from every angle. There is no "settled science" today, much less 40 years ago. Everyone knew the climate was changing 40 years ago.
    Holy #*($ you are one giant ignoramus.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TruthSeeker View Post
    No. That's a good way to defraud shareholders. It's a necessary lawsuit. I suspect every oil company will get sued for this.

    These are the new Big Tobacco cases. Big Carbon is in huge trouble.
    A travesty of justice if they are successfully sued.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoodasGold View Post
    Smoking is Good for you. Start today!
    Be an adult and make your own decisions.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    30,064
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Section2 View Post
    Ridiculous. What exactly is the argument? people wouldn't have driven cars if they knew about climate change? Look around you. It's ridiculous from every angle. There is no "settled science" today, much less 40 years ago. Everyone knew the climate was changing 40 years ago.
    If you have investments in Exxon do you think there is zero chance that climate change and its impacts (on the environment and government/consumer reaction) will influence the long-term future of the company?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    30,064
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dean S View Post
    Your intellectual dishonesty is on par with DJT. Are you DJT?
    nm

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    30,064
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoodasGold View Post
    Smoking is Good for you. Start today!
    Phillip Morris in 1990: "There is zero chance that this unsettled science on the health effects of smoking will impact our future performance, believe us."

    Section 2: "Amen! Take my $$!"

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by howeda7 View Post
    Phillip Morris in 1990: "There is zero chance that this unsettled science on the health effects of smoking will impact our future performance, believe us."

    Section 2: "Amen! Take my $$!"
    You have to be a good liar to win in the free market.

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •