Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 74
  1. #1

    Default NCAA Women’s Basketball Polls

    Guess who showed up in the AP poll after Week 1?

    http://www.espn.com/womens-college-b...kings/_/poll/1


  2. #2

    Default

    Whalen wasn’t expecting to make the poll after only one game. Her response is “we have work to do”.
    http://www.espn.com/womens-college-b...main-unchanged

  3. #3

    Default

    Today, I’m going to guess the Gophers rise at least 2 spots in the AP poll.
    I have Georgia dropping all the way off the poll from #14 after losing two games to good but unranked teams. Also I have #24 Miami dropping off after losing to unranked Iowa St.
    The Gophers could go higher than #23 depending on what the pollsters do with some teams that lost, like Marquette is the most vulnerable. Missouri list to Green Bay, but I don’t think that’ll drop them lower than the Gophers. Texas A&M lost to a higher ranked team, so they’ll most likely stay where they are now.

    So yeah, that’s my guess. Gophers at #23, or #22 if they punish Marquette.

    Don’t be surprised to see Northwestern join the poll. They might even be nipping on the heels of the Gophers or leapfrogging them if that’s the pollsters’ whimsy. I personally think they should be higher, but I’ll take the higher ranking.

  4. #4

    Default

    I was pretty much spot on with my guess, except they were kind to Miami and left them in the Top 25.

    Minnesota to #23. Northwestern still not getting respect as they stay at #28.

    http://www.espn.com/womens-college-b...3/seasontype/2

  5. #5

    Default

    Do we know what happened to the coaches' poll? I can't find a published one since week 1.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #6

    Default

    2nd to 3rd week motion in B1G teams in AP ranking ...

    Team 2nd -> 3rd (Votes)
    Maryland 9 -> 7 (508 -> 563)
    Iowa 13 -> 12 (391 -> 435)
    Minnesota 25 -> 23 (41 -> 115)
    Northwestern 28 -> 28 (15 -> 45)
    Michigan tie-32 -> tie-32 (3 -> 5)

    The AP voters must have watched the 4th quarter of the Gopher-San Diego game. Rumor is, some Minnesota hacker destroyed the tape of the first 3 quarters.
    Last edited by CutDownTheNet; 11-19-2018 at 04:17 PM.

  7. #7

    Default

    Almost need to wait for at least 5 games to be played before they begin to start these polls. Perhaps 8-10 games is a better number.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    7,688
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by #2Gopher View Post
    Almost need to wait for at least 5 games to be played before they begin to start these polls. Perhaps 8-10 games is a better number.
    Agreed. MN ranked 23rd after two games is a little to early to take seriously. They have a lot of improvements to do.
    Welcome to Badger Road Kill Country!

  9. #9

    Default

    If Marlene Stollings was still the coach this team would not be ranked this early. We will learn a lot when they play Syracuse. Go Gophers!

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rmj View Post
    If Marlene Stollings was still the coach this team would not be ranked this early. We will learn a lot when they play Syracuse. Go Gophers!
    And the team would be allowing 25-30 more points a game

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thatjanelpick View Post
    Intriguingly, Realtime RPI thinks the Gophers go undefeated until New Year's Eve:
    http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_190_Women.html
    (Note: Realtime RPI was slightly off on the San Diego score.)
    With 4 wins under our belt and an AP ranking just bumped up to number 23, we see that the Lady Gophers now have an estimated RPI rank of 66 - as currently rated by the previously quoted Realtime RPI web site. They have us beating Cornell 90-50, and also think we'll beat (AP ranked 14) Syracuse 80-69. Not sure if the Realtime RPI guys got Lindsay's memo about us focusing on defense, so the actual scores might be lower all around, yet I can imagine us beating Cornell by 30+ points. Whether we can beat Syracuse by 11 points, remains to be seen.

    The Realtime RPI folks still have us winning-out the non-conference season, and have us estimated at an 11 win/7 loss Big-Ten season. The only losses they predict for us are:
    at Michigan
    at Michigan State
    at Nebraska
    at Indiana
    at Purdue
    at Maryland
    at Rutgers
    (They must be heavily weighting the Barn as a home advantage, since they predict that we lose all B1G road games except for Wisconsin and Northwestern. I personally think their methodology is a bit shakey, since I suspect we can beat a lot of the teams in the above list, even in an away game.)

    By the way, in the USA Today Coaches Poll (http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/rankings), Minnesota is ranked number 30, near Michigan and Northwestern and Michigan State, who clock in at number 27, 33 and 45, respectively. Maryland and Iowa are ranked 10th and 14th in the Coaches Poll, with Syracuse right behind Iowa at 15th. So one might speculate that if we can beat Syracuse, then we're almost ready to play the likes of Iowa and Maryland.

  12. #12

    Default

    Today I’m going to guess USF and Missouri drop below the Gophers, so they rise to #21.
    I’m also guessing if Missouri drops off the poll, Iowa St will join the poll.

  13. #13

    Default

    Minnesota up to #20. Northwestern still not getting Top 25 respect even though three teams dropped out of the Top 25.
    http://www.espn.com/womens-college-b...kings/_/poll/1

  14. #14

    Default

    The #20 ranking is nice, although I'm still thinking it's a bit high. We'll know more after #12 Syracuse visits Thursday. I'm not optimistic about the outcome of that matchup, but I'm hoping that I'm wrong. I like the new emphasis on defense, but the Gophers still have a lot to work on. They need to do a much better job of valuing the basketball (way too many turnovers), they need to improve their free throws, and they need to get a lot better offensively. I'm not sure they have enough offensive firepower to beat Syracuse. (I'm still bemoaning the loss of Hubbard and the graduation of Wagner.) If the Gophers are going to challenge Syracuse, it might have to be one of those "grind it out" games in the 60s/low 70s.

  15. #15

    Default

    I agree with the fear we don't have the offense to stick with Syracuse. However my biggest fear is Taiye or Lamke foul trouble. Even if there are limitations on their offensive game, they need those two bigs on the court vs the bigs of Cuse. Kaposi and Tomancova having to play extended minutes due to foul trouble would be a nightmare. I think pitts will also have to play extended minutes as she is a big strong physical body that will have to guard and go against the 6'1 and 6'2 wings on Syracuse. The part that I'm not really concerned with in terms of tempo is Bell and Brunson. An up and down game suits their style. Plus Syracuse averages 18+ turnovers a game. that might be music to ball-hawking players like Bell and Brunson. I also agree free-throw shooting has to improve. I'm talking about missing 1-3 maybe four free-throws at the most. Probably will need 6-8 made 3-pointers to keep this competitive. I'm hoping we get one of those Bell games like last year vs Ohio St in the big ten tournament or vs Maryland where she is good at all aspects of the game and plays fast but under control.


    Quote Originally Posted by tripledouble View Post
    The #20 ranking is nice, although I'm still thinking it's a bit high. We'll know more after #12 Syracuse visits Thursday. I'm not optimistic about the outcome of that matchup, but I'm hoping that I'm wrong. I like the new emphasis on defense, but the Gophers still have a lot to work on. They need to do a much better job of valuing the basketball (way too many turnovers), they need to improve their free throws, and they need to get a lot better offensively. I'm not sure they have enough offensive firepower to beat Syracuse. (I'm still bemoaning the loss of Hubbard and the graduation of Wagner.) If the Gophers are going to challenge Syracuse, it might have to be one of those "grind it out" games in the 60s/low 70s.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •