Transfers are more and more part of the game so not a huge issue but always prefer to have stability among the players.
You're essentially saying you heard an interview with him and thought he was too dumb to learn a college offense. So yea, that is definitely harsh and a bit snobbishI'll admit to being super-hyped when he committed given that it was pretty clear he was a phenomenal athlete. That said (and I hope this doesn't sound harsh or snobbish), the first interview I heard with him gave me pause about his ability to learn and operate a D1 offense. I then saw the Spring game, and suddenly I was hoping he'd switch positions.
You're essentially saying you heard an interview with him and thought he was too dumb to learn a college offense. So yea, that is definitely harsh and a bit snobbish
Begs the question- did Fleck promise him the starting job (Vic sure did Row the Boat when he committed), and has since been beat out by Morgan or Annexstad? Also, why not stay here if he's switching positions?
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Of course, it has to be because Viramontes is a "tool" (only a "tool" in their own right would say such a thing), or stupid. Probably has something to do with Claeys as well. We wouldn't be in this position if he would've had a ready made Heisman candidate here for Fleck.
It's just not possible that Fleck made a poor personnel decision, and told the kid they're not going to use him.