Wouldn't it be nice


Looked a little deeper into in-state recruiting and came up with this. Some years The top 10 in MN were not all FBS players. Same with Neb., Iowa and Wisc. as well.

Top 10 In State Recruits Signed
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Illini 0 2 0 2 0 1
Iowa 3* 4 5 7* 6 3
Mary 3 5 2 2 2* 0
Mich 3* 7* 2* 2* 3 5*
MSU 3 2 4 3 4* 2
MN 6 5* 6* 2 3* 2
Nort 2 0 0 1 3 2
Neb 1* 3* 2 2* 4* 1*
OSU 4 6* 4 6* 6* 4*
PSU 6* 3 3* 6 0 1
Wisc 4* 6* 3 6* 5* 6
* signed top in state recruit
 

People just need to settle down a bit, Fleck just recruited and signed the highest rated class in Minnesota history (in the internet era).

He didn't, though. Brewster's 2008 class was more highly rated.
 





He didn't, though. Brewster's 2008 class was more highly rated.

I think these people think the internet was invented in the last 5 years.
 

I thought we did fairly often.... it's just MN HS does not make a team / not all 5* type talent.

But we do keep a lot of top HS talent here....
 

Looked a little deeper into in-state recruiting and came up with this. Some years The top 10 in MN were not all FBS players. Same with Neb., Iowa and Wisc. as well.

Top 10 In State Recruits Signed
------------2018-2017-2016-2015-2014-2013
IL-------------0----2-----0-----2-----0-----1
IA------------3*---4-----5-----7*---6------3
MD-----------3----5-----2-----2-----2*----0
MI-----------3*---7*---2*----2*----3-----5*
MSU---------3----2-----4-----3-----4*----2
MN----------6----5*----6*----2-----3*----2
NW----------2----0-----0-----1-----3-----2
NE----------1*---3*----2-----2*---4*----1*
OSU--------4----6*----4-----6*----6*----4*
PSU--------6*---3-----3*----6-----0-----1
WI----------4*--6*----3-----6*----5*----6
* signed top in state recruit
FIFY
 



I thought this was going to be about the beach boys
 

Step away from the ledge! PJ can recruit. Win a few lose a few.
 


622509d42ad0542ecae11e654b34c0ba.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 



Step away from the ledge! <b>PJ can recruit. </b>Win a few lose a few.

I think he can too, but at this point it is all just hope & people telling us so.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Now, this would take a lot of work - (way more than I have time for) - but it would be interesting to take that "top 10 recruits" chart and figure out an average grade or star rating for each state's top 10 recruits. Get a better feel for how deep the talent pool is.

What I'm getting at is this: how does the #1 rated recruit in MN - or for that matter, the #4 or #5-rated recruit in MN - compare to the same level recruit in other states? In some situations, MN may be better off getting a higher-rated recruit from another state instead of landing the #5-rated recruit from MN.

so all of this talk about - "we got 6 of the top 10 recruits in MN" - may be great - but the Gophers might actually have been better off going after out-of-state recruits with more potential.
 

Now, this would take a lot of work - (way more than I have time for) - but it would be interesting to take that "top 10 recruits" chart and figure out an average grade or star rating for each state's top 10 recruits. Get a better feel for how deep the talent pool is.

What I'm getting at is this: how does the #1 rated recruit in MN - or for that matter, the #4 or #5-rated recruit in MN - compare to the same level recruit in other states? In some situations, MN may be better off getting a higher-rated recruit from another state instead of landing the #5-rated recruit from MN.

so all of this talk about - "we got 6 of the top 10 recruits in MN" - may be great - but the Gophers might actually have been better off going after out-of-state recruits with more potential.

Possibly, if the star ratings in the “fly over” states were totally accurate. Most ranking sites don’t bother to rank a prospect in Timbuktu.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Now, this would take a lot of work - (way more than I have time for) - but it would be interesting to take that "top 10 recruits" chart and figure out an average grade or star rating for each state's top 10 recruits. Get a better feel for how deep the talent pool is.

What I'm getting at is this: how does the #1 rated recruit in MN - or for that matter, the #4 or #5-rated recruit in MN - compare to the same level recruit in other states? In some situations, MN may be better off getting a higher-rated recruit from another state instead of landing the #5-rated recruit from MN.

so all of this talk about - "we got 6 of the top 10 recruits in MN" - may be great - but the Gophers might actually have been better off going after out-of-state recruits with more potential.

I was curious about this myself so I put together a spreadsheet a couple weeks ago for the 2019 recruiting class. Out of the 39 states (well, 38 states plus DC) that have at least 5 players ranked on 247 it goes as follows:

Rnk State Avg T10 Rating
1 Georgia 0.9828
2 California 0.9808
3 Texas 0.9799
4 Florida 0.9783
5 Louisiana 0.9585
6 Mississippi 0.9577
7 Alabama 0.9512
8 North Carolina 0.9354
9 Michigan 0.9291
10 Ohio 0.9290
11 Tennessee 0.9268
12 Virginia 0.9241
13 Missouri 0.9178
14 Maryland 0.9172
15 New Jersey 0.9133
16 Arizona 0.9041
17 Indiana 0.8994
18 Hawaii 0.8978
19 Kentucky 0.8965
20 Oklahoma 0.8955
21 Arkansas 0.8898
22 Illinois 0.8898
23 Pennsylvania 0.8838
24 South Carolina 0.8780
25 Nebraska (5) 0.8739
26 Utah 0.8710
27 DC 0.8680
28 Washington 0.8665
29 West Virginia (8) 0.8648
30 Iowa 0.8639
31 Colorado 0.8634
32 Connecticut 0.8615
33 Kansas 0.8580
34 Nevada 0.8507
35 Minnesota (7) 0.8429
36 Oregon 0.8424
37 New York (9) 0.8279
38 Massachusetts (6) 0.8228
39 Wisconsin (9) 0.8227


Minnesota's top 2019 recruit (Carroll) would rank:
#1 -- 29 states
#2-3 -- 14 states
#4-5 -- 2 states
#6-10 -- 4 states
#11+ -- 2 states
*counting DC as a state


Thought it would also be interesting to look at average top 10 rating by conference footprint:
SEC -- .9395
ACC -- .9170
Big 12 -- .9155
Pac 12 -- .9070
Big 10 -- .8917

- In doing this I only counted the states where each conference has an institution as a member. So, DC does not count for anyone including Maryland.
- I also did it based on the number of schools in each state. ie the state of Michigan average Top 10 rating factored into the Big 10 score twice because there are two Big 10 schools in the state of Michigan.
 

People just need to settle down a bit, Fleck just recruited and signed the highest rated class in Minnesota history (in the internet era).

He got those elite linemen from Florida...do you think the Florida State or Florida fans are all up in arms about those kids coming up north to Minnesota??

When your program has been down as long as Minnesota has, it's going to take some time to re-build the culture and create a tradition of winning. Look at where Wisconsin was in the 1980's and early 1990's and where they are now.

Minnesota was in the running for Carroll right until the last few weeks, in past years, Minnesota would not have even been considered at this point. We just need Fleck and the coaching staff to continue to recruit hard and hopefully they can carry that over on to the field and we start seeing more wins.

Might want to check your rankings. The final result was not the highest rated class after all. Brewster’s first class is/was according to 24/7.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Coaches get credit for players they sign - it doesn't matter when he committed. If he didn't like Fleck he had plenty of other options. Fleck still had to recruit him to get his signature.

Agree 100%. Fleck didn’t get him to commit, but he kept him in the fold which is far more important.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Might want to check your rankings. The final result was not the highest rated class after all. Brewster’s first class is/was according to 24/7.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rated and ranked are two different things. Technically he's right, last year had the highest composite rating of any close ever but was ranked lower than Brewster's class. But ratings have gotten higher over time. I think ranking is the better way to look at it.
 

<b>Coaches get credit for players they sign - </b>it doesn't matter when he committed. If he didn't like Fleck he had plenty of other options. Fleck still had to recruit him to get his signature.

I agree - but have read on here a million times all about how Claeys didn't deserve credit for the one class he signed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 




Top Bottom