STrib: Here's why P.J. Fleck wants '125 Blake Cashmans' on Gophers

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
60,698
Reaction score
15,935
Points
113
per Randy:

Throughout the season, the questions have come:

“Where’s Blake Cashman?”

“Why isn’t Cashman playing more?”

“When are they going to use Blake Cashman?”

Last Saturday night at Michigan, Gophers football fans got their answer. Amid the rubble of the 33-10 loss to the Wolverines, a shiny gem stood out in the form of the junior linebacker. Cashman made six tackles and notched his first sack of the season, flashing the form that made him the Gophers’ sack leader in 2016 and forecast a prominent role for him going forward.

Cashman, who has spent the season as a third-down specialist and special teams ace, saw extensive action against Michigan after Jonathan Celestin, the starting outside linebacker ahead of him, left the game because of an elbow injury. Cashman’s biggest play was a third-down sack of Wolverines quarterback Brandon Peters early in the third quarter.

“I was just ready to get in there when my name was called,” the speedy, 6-2, 235-pounder from Eden Prairie said after the game. “It’s a team effort, and I just wish we could’ve executed better.”

Cashman gives Gophers defensive coordinator Robb Smith options, and he’ll likely see more action in the final three games, beginning Saturday morning when the Gophers (4-5, 1-5 Big Ten) play Nebraska (4-5, 3-3) at TCF Bank Stadium. Celestin, a senior, is the team’s second-leading tackler and has played effectively through that injury, so Smith will get creative to get Cashman more playing time.

“He’s becoming more than just a third-down guy for us,” Smith said. “[Cashman] can do some things on first and second down. He has the uncanny ability to track the football and accelerate and go make plays. We need that to continue, and he’ll certainly have a niche there. ... Fresh guys are better football players. We’re sorting through that right now.”

Added coach P.J. Fleck: “He’ll continue to play. There is a pretty good player in front of him right now, Jon Celestin, but I think we’ll be able to find ways to get them both on the field at different times and at the same time.”

http://m.startribune.com/here-s-why...cashmans-on-gophers/456209863/?section=sports

Go Gophers!!
 

Cashman should already have been playing more. Not recognizing the ability this guy has to influence a game and taking advantage of that ability is a flub by this staff. I hope they keep him on the field as much as possible.
 

Cashman should already have been playing more. Not recognizing the ability this guy has to influence a game and taking advantage of that ability is a flub by this staff. I hope they keep him on the field as much as possible.

To be fair, he was on the field some during the non-con and v. Maryland at LB/DE at times to make plays. Wasn't shedding blocks or making plays when he was in. Possible the coaching staff had him out of position or not giving him enough good opportunities to succeed. I do agree though, he can be a dynamic player and should be on the field as much as they can get him out there.
 

If Celestin isn't full-go for this game yet, then it's easy: Cashman starts at LB and plays the whole game or most of it.

But if Celestin is back ... then you have to somehow work a rotation of Cashman and Coughlin between that weak-side DE / 4th LB type position. Maybe Coughlin has his hand in the dirt for a true 4-3 look, while Cashman plays either stand-up DE or a true 3-4 look?

I just don't see how you don't have Cashman out there ...


I can understand and buy that Barber is playing great and is our middle LB, no questions asked, and that K-Mart is our cover LB, which might not be as much in Cashman's wheelhouse.

But the guy makes too many plays to keep him on the sideline.
 

If there were 125 Cashman's on our team?

WHY AREN'T WE PLAYING THEM ALL!?!!??
 


Cashman should already have been playing more. Not recognizing the ability this guy has to influence a game and taking advantage of that ability is a flub by this staff. I hope they keep him on the field as much as possible.

+1
 


We’d still be clamoring to put in the 2nd string QB


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wait. In this scenario (125 Blake Cashmans on the team) wouldn't our starting and backup QB both be Blake Cashman? I would love to debate which should start.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Matrix-Hugo-Weaving-Prop-Head-71.jpg
 



This has been one of the many concerns with the Fleck vs Claeys folks. Claeys would have had Cashman on the field making plays this entire season. Just one of the many growing pains that comes with a new coaching staff.
 

This has been one of the many concerns with the Fleck vs Claeys folks. Claeys would have had Cashman on the field making plays this entire season. Just one of the many growing pains that comes with a new coaching staff.

Cashman has been on the field, mostly as a pass rusher on 3rd down's a lot this year, which is exactly how he was used last year. He just hadn't done much until last week.
 

The way Michigan was running the ball early on we should have just played him down on the goal line
 




Top Bottom