STrib: Major revenue source of Gophers athletics faces an uncertain future

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
60,728
Reaction score
16,029
Points
113
per Joe:

When Mark Coyle finished his first stint at the University of Minnesota, leaving to become associate athletic director at Kentucky in 2005, the Gophers were collecting $10.7 million each year in Big Ten revenue.

That was two years before the Big Ten Network launched, revamping the college sports television landscape. By the time Coyle returned to take the Gophers’ AD job last year, Minnesota’s share of Big Ten revenue had spiked to $36.3 million.

By next year, that number will skyrocket again, to $51.1 million, according to University of Michigan projections, as reported by the Detroit News.

But after inheriting a budget deficit at Minnesota and making an expensive football coaching change — from Tracy Claeys to P.J. Fleck last winter — Coyle needs the added Big Ten revenue to balance the books.

A former AD at Boise State and Syracuse, Coyle preaches caution, knowing the college sports landscape could shift again, as droves of consumers move away from cable TV.

“I think everyone’s mindful of what’s happened across the country with cord-cutting,” Coyle said. “I think we’re foolish if we don’t think there will be an impact on us, so how do we prepare for that?”

The latest Big Ten windfall arrives as the conference begins new media rights deals with Fox and ESPN. Commissioner Jim Delany made a calculated gamble, agreeing to six-year contracts this time around. The SEC and ACC, for comparison, have deals that run through 2033-34 and 2035-36, respectively.

What happens to Big Ten media revenue after 2023 is anybody’s guess. ESPN reportedly has lost 12 million subscribers over the past six years, costing $1.2 billion in annual revenue, and recently made high-profile layoffs.

“Eventually, you have to wonder, will this money be coming in to conferences like the Big Ten forever?” said Dave Ridpath, an associate professor at Ohio University and oft-cited expert on college sports business. “Considering what’s recently happened at ESPN, I still think there’s a bubble, but when that bubble bursts, who knows?”

http://www.startribune.com/major-re...thletics-faces-an-uncertain-future/433362643/

Go Gophers!!
 

per Joe:

When Mark Coyle finished his first stint at the University of Minnesota, leaving to become associate athletic director at Kentucky in 2005, the Gophers were collecting $10.7 million each year in Big Ten revenue.

That was two years before the Big Ten Network launched, revamping the college sports television landscape. By the time Coyle returned to take the Gophers’ AD job last year, Minnesota’s share of Big Ten revenue had spiked to $36.3 million.

By next year, that number will skyrocket again, to $51.1 million, according to University of Michigan projections, as reported by the Detroit News.

But after inheriting a budget deficit at Minnesota and making an expensive football coaching change — from Tracy Claeys to P.J. Fleck last winter — Coyle needs the added Big Ten revenue to balance the books.

A former AD at Boise State and Syracuse, Coyle preaches caution, knowing the college sports landscape could shift again, as droves of consumers move away from cable TV.

“I think everyone’s mindful of what’s happened across the country with cord-cutting,” Coyle said. “I think we’re foolish if we don’t think there will be an impact on us, so how do we prepare for that?”

The latest Big Ten windfall arrives as the conference begins new media rights deals with Fox and ESPN. Commissioner Jim Delany made a calculated gamble, agreeing to six-year contracts this time around. The SEC and ACC, for comparison, have deals that run through 2033-34 and 2035-36, respectively.

What happens to Big Ten media revenue after 2023 is anybody’s guess. ESPN reportedly has lost 12 million subscribers over the past six years, costing $1.2 billion in annual revenue, and recently made high-profile layoffs.

“Eventually, you have to wonder, will this money be coming in to conferences like the Big Ten forever?” said Dave Ridpath, an associate professor at Ohio University and oft-cited expert on college sports business. “Considering what’s recently happened at ESPN, I still think there’s a bubble, but when that bubble bursts, who knows?”

http://www.startribune.com/major-re...thletics-faces-an-uncertain-future/433362643/

Go Gophers!!

However it evolves somebody will figure out a way to generate equal or greater revenue. The source of TV may change but I believe people are still going to watch college football and basketball.
http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/tv-ratings-ncaa-championship-game-tar-heels-cbs-1202022251/
 

From my perspective (with my own kids) I see them watching way less cable tv and opting for streaming services like net flicks for movies and online internet services for news, etc. I would not be surprised if sports will end up mostly like this.
 

However it evolves somebody will figure out a way to generate equal or greater revenue. The source of TV may change but I believe people are still going to watch college football and basketball.
http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/tv-ratings-ncaa-championship-game-tar-heels-cbs-1202022251/

The question is can the people who watch sports prop up the industry when the people who don't watch them don't have to pay for them anymore. I see fewer people supporting every sports team in town and choosing a few leagues they can afford to pay for standalone. Either that or the sports networks will team up and create a sports specific TV package. Although that will never happen until ESPN charges the same as everybody else and not 300-400% more than Fox Sports for example.

Cord cutting means sports fans will be the only ones supporting the industry. We'll have to see how much they're willing to pay. I don't think it will be close to what the leagues are getting now.

But I also don't predict doomsday, I just predict a day where sports don't rule America like they do now. Sports are sustainable right now without outrageous TV contracts, just look at The American Association of Independent Professional Baseball and USL for proof.
 



From my perspective (with my own kids) I see them watching way less cable tv and opting for streaming services like net flicks for movies and online internet services for news, etc. I would not be surprised if sports will end up mostly like this.


I believe that is the future
 

From my perspective (with my own kids) I see them watching way less cable tv and opting for streaming services like net flicks for movies and online internet services for news, etc. I would not be surprised if sports will end up mostly like this.

We have gig internet available now. The line between 'regular tv' and streaming is rapidly disappearing. I wouldn't be shocked to see a conference sign a contract with Amazon or Google within 10 years.
 




Top Bottom