All Things EOAA, Investigation, Suspension, Overturned Etc. Thread: UPDATED 1 Thread

per the Stillwater Gazette Editorial Board:

Editorial opinion: University, Kaler can’t afford a third strike
Published February 27, 2017 at 3:49 pm
For the University of Minnesota, there is much work to be done to regain the trust of students, parents and the state at large. It can start with a recalibration of the U’s moral compass.

Ten Gopher football players were identified and investigated, along with a juvenile recruit, following sexual assault allegations. Four of the players have been expelled and two suspended upon recommendations by the University of Minnesota’s Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action.

Minnesotans are all investors in the University, whether by writing tuition checks or having our tax dollars subsidize the institution. That is why we deserve a clear plan on how the school will repair trust in the institution and hold student-athletes to a higher standard going forward.

In September, a woman alleged that multiple players pressured her to have sex and she was too intoxicated to give consent. This put the U of M under the microscope for the last six months, revealing disgusting behavior and absent accountability.

The controversy peaked in December when remaining members of the team announced a boycott of the Holiday Bowl, a move supported by some coaching staff, including Head Coach Tracy Claeys. After a copy of a lengthy report following the University’s investigation was leaked to news outlet KSTP, the players ended the boycott. Claeys was fired a week after the bowl game.

While the Minneapolis Police Department investigated and Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman twice reviewed the case, no criminal charges were filed. Still, the damning 80-page report from the University made it clear that the players involved did not live up to the school’s code of conduct for student athletes. Freeman called their behavior “deplorable.”

Although the University’s core functions are education and research, we cannot dismiss the power of athletics and how they lend to the U’s brand.

The University’s high-profile sports teams are the most familiar faces to the public and their closest connection to the maroon and gold. Of late, there have been some poor ambassadors on the football fields, basketball courts, wrestling mats — and in the school’s top administration. This comes on the heels of a scandal involving one of the school’s top administrators, former Athletic Director Norwood Teague, who resigned after it was revealed he sexually harassed women he worked with.

This was the first strike against University President Eric Kaler, who then brought in Mark Coyle to lead the athletic department and turn things around. We are entitled to expect him to get it right.

In September, Coyle fired longtime wrestling coach J Robinson following an investigation into players’ use and sale of Xanax, a prescription sedative.

Among the many failures in lack of oversight by the University, it is unacceptable for a juvenile recruit to be turned loose without responsible supervision. We expect changes in protocol to be made.

At a public speaking engagement in Oakdale early this year, Coyle admitted the last seven months had been the toughest of his life. “The last five weeks have rocked me,” he said.

Coyle emphasized that accountability needs to be shown by student athletes, adding that the word has lost its meaning. “It should be a privilege for athletes to put on that M jersey,” Coyle said.

We agree, and point out that a privilege is distinctly different from a right. Just because a student is not charged with a crime does not mean there shouldn’t be significant repercussions.

Coyle said he is responsible for developing and enforcing the student athlete code of conduct.

The University is well within bounds to bench, or turf, athletes who do not live up to the school’s standards. We need to see the rules enforced, along with recruitment of student-athletes who are of the quality in talent and character that will make that the school, and the state, proud.

Now that a coaching change is in place with the hiring of P.J. Fleck, it’s time for the University to present a comprehensive plan on how it will hold its student-athletes and staff accountable going forward.

Sadly, all of these incidents take the spotlight away from deserving students and athletes who are working hard to achieve degrees in the classroom and success in highly competitive athletics.

This is the second major incident on President Kaler’s watch. Clearly, it’s time for a major culture change. Despite some raising concerns about their involvement, the University’s Board of Regents must play an important role in the turnaround.

Kaler, and the Regents, are ultimately responsible for making sure the University of Minnesota is a safe place for all students to learn, and where women are respected. There will be no excuse for a third strike.

http://stillwatergazette.com/2017/0...-university-kaler-cant-afford-a-third-strike/

Go Gophers!!
 

Sigh, another lazy article by people that should know better. First, the EOAA did not recommend that 4 players be expelled and 2 suspended. They recommended that 5 be expelled, 4 suspended, and one probation. Their recommendations and the the school's student conduct office decision to follow those recommendations were overturned by the Formal appeal by the student sexual misconduct committee.

That's strike one.

Then, this "journalist" states correctly that Mike Freeman did examine the evidence twice, including the so-called smoking gun of one of the players saying she wasn't into it (in the EOAA account), a statement the player said he never made. The EOAA did not record the interviews. But, this journalist found the report "damning" despite no evidence provided and the the EOAA findings being overturned or reduced for 4 of the accused.

That's strike two.

Judging sexual activity as "disgusting" is something one tends to hear from the mouth or pen of a conservative religious leader, not a journalist. This journalist might be shocked to hear that men are having sex with men, women with women, anal sex is not uncommon, and group sex is quite common. Unless this journalist has evidence a crime occurred that night as he or she seems to imply, I am surprised that consensual sexual activity is labeled as disgusting. If he or she doesn't have evidence a crime occurred they ought to put down their pen, shut their mouth, or stop typing.

Strike three.
 

Sigh, another lazy article by people that should know better. First, the EOAA did not recommend that 4 players be expelled and 2 suspended. They recommended that 5 be expelled, 4 suspended, and one probation. Their recommendations and the the school's student conduct office decision to follow those recommendations were overturned by the Formal appeal by the student sexual misconduct committee.

That's strike one.

Then, this "journalist" states correctly that Mike Freeman did examine the evidence twice, including the so-called smoking gun of one of the players saying she wasn't into it (in the EOAA account), a statement the player said he never made. The EOAA did not record the interviews. But, this journalist found the report "damning" despite no evidence provided and the the EOAA findings being overturned or reduced for 4 of the accused.

That's strike two.

Judging sexual activity as "disgusting" is something one tends to hear from the mouth or pen of a conservative religious leader, not a journalist. This journalist might be shocked to hear that men are having sex with men, women with women, anal sex is not uncommon, and group sex is quite common. Unless this journalist has evidence a crime occurred that night as he or she seems to imply, I am surprised that consensual sexual activity is labeled as disgusting. If he or she doesn't have evidence a crime occurred they ought to put down their pen, shut their mouth, or stop typing.

Strike three.

Life doesn't work like that. Perception is as important as reality in many instances.
 

per the Stillwater Gazette Editorial Board:

Editorial opinion: University, Kaler can’t afford a third strike
Published February 27, 2017 at 3:49 pm
For the University of Minnesota, there is much work to be done to regain the trust of students, parents and the state at large. It can start with a recalibration of the U’s moral compass.

Ten Gopher football players were identified and investigated, along with a juvenile recruit, following sexual assault allegations. Four of the players have been expelled and two suspended upon recommendations by the University of Minnesota’s Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action.

Minnesotans are all investors in the University, whether by writing tuition checks or having our tax dollars subsidize the institution. That is why we deserve a clear plan on how the school will repair trust in the institution and hold student-athletes to a higher standard going forward.

In September, a woman alleged that multiple players pressured her to have sex and she was too intoxicated to give consent. This put the U of M under the microscope for the last six months, revealing disgusting behavior and absent accountability.

The controversy peaked in December when remaining members of the team announced a boycott of the Holiday Bowl, a move supported by some coaching staff, including Head Coach Tracy Claeys. After a copy of a lengthy report following the University’s investigation was leaked to news outlet KSTP, the players ended the boycott. Claeys was fired a week after the bowl game.

While the Minneapolis Police Department investigated and Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman twice reviewed the case, no criminal charges were filed. Still, the damning 80-page report from the University made it clear that the players involved did not live up to the school’s code of conduct for student athletes. Freeman called their behavior “deplorable.”

Although the University’s core functions are education and research, we cannot dismiss the power of athletics and how they lend to the U’s brand.

The University’s high-profile sports teams are the most familiar faces to the public and their closest connection to the maroon and gold. Of late, there have been some poor ambassadors on the football fields, basketball courts, wrestling mats — and in the school’s top administration. This comes on the heels of a scandal involving one of the school’s top administrators, former Athletic Director Norwood Teague, who resigned after it was revealed he sexually harassed women he worked with.

This was the first strike against University President Eric Kaler, who then brought in Mark Coyle to lead the athletic department and turn things around. We are entitled to expect him to get it right.

In September, Coyle fired longtime wrestling coach J Robinson following an investigation into players’ use and sale of Xanax, a prescription sedative.

Among the many failures in lack of oversight by the University, it is unacceptable for a juvenile recruit to be turned loose without responsible supervision. We expect changes in protocol to be made.

At a public speaking engagement in Oakdale early this year, Coyle admitted the last seven months had been the toughest of his life. “The last five weeks have rocked me,” he said.

Coyle emphasized that accountability needs to be shown by student athletes, adding that the word has lost its meaning. “It should be a privilege for athletes to put on that M jersey,” Coyle said.

We agree, and point out that a privilege is distinctly different from a right. Just because a student is not charged with a crime does not mean there shouldn’t be significant repercussions.

Coyle said he is responsible for developing and enforcing the student athlete code of conduct.

The University is well within bounds to bench, or turf, athletes who do not live up to the school’s standards. We need to see the rules enforced, along with recruitment of student-athletes who are of the quality in talent and character that will make that the school, and the state, proud.

Now that a coaching change is in place with the hiring of P.J. Fleck, it’s time for the University to present a comprehensive plan on how it will hold its student-athletes and staff accountable going forward.

Sadly, all of these incidents take the spotlight away from deserving students and athletes who are working hard to achieve degrees in the classroom and success in highly competitive athletics.

This is the second major incident on President Kaler’s watch. Clearly, it’s time for a major culture change. Despite some raising concerns about their involvement, the University’s Board of Regents must play an important role in the turnaround.

Kaler, and the Regents, are ultimately responsible for making sure the University of Minnesota is a safe place for all students to learn, and where women are respected. There will be no excuse for a third strike.

http://stillwatergazette.com/2017/02/27/editorial-opinion-university-kaler-cant-afford-a-third-strike/

Go Gophers!!

What about the professor that is actually charged with rape? Why no press and demands for changing the culture of the academics????
 

What about the professor that is actually charged with rape? Why no press and demands for changing the culture of the academics???? Where is Title IX? Why is this being swept under the rug?

edit
 


Was the Law Prof's victim a student? If not, I'm not sure title IX would apply.

In the Strib this morning there was an article about a male on male alleged rape involving a frat member and a pledge. It also involved online threats and intimidation. The accused has not been charged and his name/photo, etc. have not been released, a stark contrast to the daily treatment the football players received. It will be interesting to see if an independent Title IX investigation is triggered. By their own rules, there should be. I'm not holding my breath though, It doesn't fit the narrative.
 

Life doesn't work like that. Perception is as important as reality in many instances.

Typically journalists try to report facts, and not fan the flames of ignorance. I realize this is an editorial but it was built on shoddy facts and a one-sided POV. Even the Srib editor did a sort of mea culpa.
 

What about the professor that is actually charged with rape? Why no press and demands for changing the culture of the academics????

Might want to hold off on going after that professor guy.

There was a follow up article and the woman and this dude have had a long weird history / a past accusation of rape that just sort of disappeared.... it's not really clear what is going on in that case.
 

Might want to hold off on going after that professor guy.

There was a follow up article and the woman and this dude have had a long weird history / a past accusation of rape that just sort of disappeared.... it's not really clear what is going on in that case.

I'm going after the two faced Kaler and media.....
 




Well I think the professor is suspended so it's not like he got off easier.

Yeah. So where the public outcry? The demands for the Dean of the law school to resign for allowing this kind of culture? Etc, etc, etc....
 

Yeah. So where the public outcry? The demands for the Dean of the law school to resign for allowing this kind of culture? Etc, etc, etc....

The other story that came out later made it seem like a lot more weird situation than first reported. There is a hell of a lot more data out there involving the two people.

Also it is being handled via the criminal courts at this point.
 

The other story that came out later made it seem like a lot more weird situation than first reported. There is a hell of a lot more data out there involving the two people.

Also it is being handled via the criminal courts at this point.

That it's being handled by the criminal courts and there are actual charges makes it a worse case in my opinion, yet people are ignoring it because it's boring compared to marking ten kids for life who didn't even commit a chargeable crime. Society is stupid.
 



That it's being handled by the criminal courts and there are actual charges makes it a worse case in my opinion, yet people are ignoring it because it's boring compared to marking ten kids for life who didn't even commit a chargeable crime. Society is stupid.

I think the opaqueness of the school disciplinary process just feeds the media frenzy.

In many ways if the criminal courts prosecute it is so much easier for everyone.... otherwise it gets weirdly political and nobody knows what is going on.
 

I think the opaqueness of the school disciplinary process just feeds the media frenzy.

In many ways if the criminal courts prosecute it is so much easier for everyone.... otherwise it gets weirdly political and nobody knows what is going on.

Agreed for the specific crime... However the broad brush of "changing the culture" should apply to academics as well as sports. I just think it's hypocritical to ignore or play down this case. Off my soapbox now.
 

This is a bizarre story. His first mistake was buying a condo with a stranger. The drama ensued. While the professor could certainly be guilty, based on the multiple prior restraining orders vs other men I'm going to assess that this lady is what is called "cray-cray" in the psychiatric field. The fact charges were brought vs this professor so late after the incident, with her history, shows how weak the case was vs the Gopher Ten. The police And DA must have really found the accuser to be a poor witness. Also, the double standard on rape allegations is interesting. Why is this professor not suspended?

From the Strib


According to interviews and court records, Parisi and the woman agreed after their relationship began to buy a condo in December 2014.

But in January 2015 the relationship soured. By March, Parisi filed a lawsuit to cancel the purchase agreement. She filed an order for protection against him that same day, accusing him of preventing her from leaving his apartment and yelling and screaming at her in January.

Early the next month she counter sued him over the purchase cancellation attempt, but made no mention of the alleged assault. In April 2015, the restraining order was dismissed following a settlement.

She filed two more complaints against him over the property, and for the first time in a January 2016 filing accused him of beating her — but she made no mention of the rape.

In June 2016, the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Parisi in the property dispute. Two weeks later, she reported to police that Parisi sexually assaulted her in January 2015, according to records. According to the Hennepin County attorney’s office, that report was never forwarded for potential charges.

In August 2016, she filed for another order for protection against him, saying that Parisi sexually assaulted and stalked her. That order was dismissed in October following another settlement. Court records show the woman had previously filed orders for protection against other people in unrelated cases.

http://www.startribune.com/u-law-pr...ictim-have-extensive-legal-history/414550263/
 

This is a bizarre story. His first mistake was buying a condo with a stranger. The drama ensued. While the professor could certainly be guilty based on the multiple prior restraining orders vs other men I'm going to assess that this lady is what is called "cray-cray" in the psychiatric field. The fact charges were brought vs this professor so late after the incident, with her history, shows how weak the case was vs the Gopher Ten. The police And DA must have really found the accuser to be a poor witness. Also, the double standard on rape allegations is interesting. Why is this professor not suspended?

From the Strib


According to interviews and court records, Parisi and the woman agreed after their relationship began to buy a condo in December 2014.

But in January 2015 the relationship soured. By March, Parisi filed a lawsuit to cancel the purchase agreement. She filed an order for protection against him that same day, accusing him of preventing her from leaving his apartment and yelling and screaming at her in January.

Early the next month she counter sued him over the purchase cancellation attempt, but made no mention of the alleged assault. In April 2015, the restraining order was dismissed following a settlement.

She filed two more complaints against him over the property, and for the first time in a January 2016 filing accused him of beating her — but she made no mention of the rape.

In June 2016, the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Parisi in the property dispute. Two weeks later, she reported to police that Parisi sexually assaulted her in January 2015, according to records. According to the Hennepin County attorney’s office, that report was never forwarded for potential charges.

In August 2016, she filed for another order for protection against him, saying that Parisi sexually assaulted and stalked her. That order was dismissed in October following another settlement. Court records show the woman had previously filed orders for protection against other people in unrelated cases.

http://www.startribune.com/u-law-pr...ictim-have-extensive-legal-history/414550263/

I don't think she was a stranger.

But yeah that whole situation is bizarre.... I don't know what to make of it.
 

Well, they had a relationship lasted "several months" and bought the condo relatively quickly after the start of the relationship. IMO that person is a stranger in the sense you haven't really gotten to know them and it's a really, really bad idea to enter into a financial marriage so soon. Clearly some very bizarre events transpired shortly after the purchase. People can be really, really complex.
 

Well, they had a relationship lasted "several months" and bought the condo relatively quickly after the start of the relationship. IMO that person is a stranger in the sense you haven't really gotten to know them and it's a really, really bad idea to enter into a financial marriage so soon. Clearly some very bizarre events transpired shortly after the purchase. People can be really, really complex.

What is weird is that it sounds like many many many many years ago..... they should have just not spoken to each other again... ever, and they both would have been better off.
 

Well...I don't think everyone is playing with a full deck here. One or both is the question.
 

Sigh, another lazy article by people that should know better. First, the EOAA did not recommend that 4 players be expelled and 2 suspended. They recommended that 5 be expelled, 4 suspended, and one probation. Their recommendations and the the school's student conduct office decision to follow those recommendations were overturned by the Formal appeal by the student sexual misconduct committee.

That's strike one.

Then, this "journalist" states correctly that Mike Freeman did examine the evidence twice, including the so-called smoking gun of one of the players saying she wasn't into it (in the EOAA account), a statement the player said he never made. The EOAA did not record the interviews. But, this journalist found the report "damning" despite no evidence provided and the the EOAA findings being overturned or reduced for 4 of the accused.

That's strike two.

Judging sexual activity as "disgusting" is something one tends to hear from the mouth or pen of a conservative religious leader, not a journalist. This journalist might be shocked to hear that men are having sex with men, women with women, anal sex is not uncommon, and group sex is quite common. Unless this journalist has evidence a crime occurred that night as he or she seems to imply, I am surprised that consensual sexual activity is labeled as disgusting. If he or she doesn't have evidence a crime occurred they ought to put down their pen, shut their mouth, or stop typing.

Strike three.

Yep, guess they don't feel the need to fact check their editorials over there. Additionally, Freeman's comment was based on a now fairly discredited, and massaged narrative weaved by the EOAA report.

"In September, a woman alleged that multiple players pressured her to have sex and she was too intoxicated to give consent. This put the U of M under the microscope for the last six months, revealing disgusting behavior and absent accountability." Of course they didn't also include that she later confirmed that she in fact was not drunk, which in turn calls into question the truthfulness of her entire allegation.
 


I didn't see this anywhere else, but apparently Winfield and McCrary are not practicing today because the woman is appealing the ruling...all reports point to them being able to be back on the field Thursday, though.
 

I didn't see this anywhere else, but apparently Winfield and McCrary are not practicing today because the woman is appealing the ruling...all reports point to them being able to be back on the field Thursday, though.

Oh, FFS.
 

I didn't see this anywhere else, but apparently Winfield and McCrary are not practicing today because the woman is appealing the ruling...all reports point to them being able to be back on the field Thursday, though.

I thought this was a joke. Looked on twitter and sure enough......
 

Anyone know - after this appeal will it be FINAL? It'll be nice for this to be over and we can move on.
 



Guilty until proven innocent.

Just wait until any hint of an "aggressive assault" via sexual, racial, religious, gender statement or look is reported to the campus inquisitors and those students are suspended in order to provide a welcoming an "assault-free" campus. Don't think it can't/won't or isn't already happening. Freedom!
 

So is this a surprise as of today, or has this appeal been going on in the background over the past few weeks?

If it's the former, this is an absolute sh** show. What a joke.
 




Top Bottom