OddStack
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 1,569
- Reaction score
- 238
- Points
- 63
Who do they think they are! Nebraska? Oh, that's right, Nebraska is never investigated.
I'm lazy and guess I don't want to do my own digging on Google. Did anything happen in terms of penalties with either North Carolina or Oklahoma State?
And those watchdogs are also filled with biased and corruptible people and on and on. I'm pretty biased about that....They are too busy thinking of ways to punish USC.
The NCAA is made up of biased and corruptible people like any other organization. It serves a necessary purpose, so I am a NCAA backer but oftentimes watchdogs need watchdogs.
And those watchdogs are also filled with biased and corruptible people and on and on. I'm pretty biased about that....
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
UNC, USC, Miami, Penn St, etc. and now MSU. Does any of it really matter? The NCAA is one big sad joke. Maybe the NCAA should get back to the serious business of game rules like the touchdown celebration rule.
The NCAA has two sets of rules:
For the haves = Usually dismissed as a violation done by underlings requiring a slap in the wrist.
For the have nots = NCAA automatically feels they need a thorough investigation requiring heavy sanctions and possibly the death penalty.
If the papacy can be corrupted over the centuries, so can a few men that control the NCAA. Follow the money trail.
Is USC a have or have not?
Sorry this is way off topic but what is taking so long for the NCAA to deliver the punishment to UNC?
The scale is so big that if they punished them relative to the scale of the cheating they would have to forfeit wins for 20 years, literally, and lose scholarships indefinitely. 2,000 students took fake courses over a 20 year period. How do you punish that? It ought to be a death penalty case, it is the definition of lack of institutional control unless someone wants to conclude the school knew exactly what it was doing.Sorry this is way off topic but what is taking so long for the NCAA to deliver the punishment to UNC?
The scale is so big that if they punished them relative to the scale of the cheating they would have to forfeit wins for 20 years, literally, and lose scholarships indefinitely. 2,000 students took fake courses over a 20 year period. How do you punish that? It ought to be a death penalty case, it is the definition of lack of institutional control unless someone wants to conclude the school knew exactly what it was doing.
The scale is so big that if they punished them relative to the scale of the cheating they would have to forfeit wins for 20 years, literally, and lose scholarships indefinitely. 2,000 students took fake courses over a 20 year period. How do you punish that? It ought to be a death penalty case, it is the definition of lack of institutional control unless someone wants to conclude the school knew exactly what it was doing.
I remember a few years ago when Ole Miss had the number one recruiting class out of nowhere and people were wondering if some funny business was going on. One of the guys tied up in this mess is Dave Saunders of Louisiana-Lafayette (was also at Ole Miss). I wonder how close he and Jay Johnson were at that school:
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/...h-david-saunders-receives-sanctions/78684126/
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/blogs/...aa-violations-involve-football-021416363.html
Sorry this is way off topic but what is taking so long for the NCAA to deliver the punishment to UNC?
I'm convinced one of the best jobs in the country is to do the investigations for the NCAA. It appears you can work at whatever pace you want. It must be nice to work 10 hours a week. Then they can just throw a dart at a dartboard to decide what the penalty will be.
I guess Rick Pitino said on Mike & Mike that he hasn't even been interviewed by the NCAA. Why the hell does it take so long? Makes no sense.
Sorry this is way off topic but what is taking so long for the NCAA to deliver the punishment to UNC?