ESPN: Thorpe snubs could add to chip on Minnesota's shoulder

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
60,716
Reaction score
15,968
Points
113
per Austin Ward:

Just in case the chip on the shoulders of two of the Big Ten’s best cornerbacks wasn’t already big enough, wide receivers across the league can thank the Thorpe Award committee for making it even bigger.

Preseason watch lists may not be worth anything more than stirring up debate and helping pass the time in a football-less summer, but that doesn’t mean they all go unnoticed by players -- particularly by those who would justifiably feel snubbed. And anybody that doesn’t believe Eric Murray and Briean Boddy-Calhoun have earned that right heading into this season hasn’t been paying attention.

Whether the Gophers use the oversight as fuel or simply brush it aside, it’s yet another reminder that the program still has work to do to shape its perception as a perpetual underdog. Coincidentally, there’s a massive opportunity collectively to bury it when the season opens in September with a primetime showdown against TCU that will have no shortage of attention. And individually it could turn into a showcase for a couple defenders who were bypassed in favor of four defensive backs from the Sun Belt and four more from the MAC.

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post...nubs-could-add-to-chip-on-minnesotas-shoulder

Go Gophers!!
 

They have a chance to prove themselves Week 1 on national TV against two very good WR's. Should be fun.
 

They have a chance to prove themselves Week 1 on national TV against two very good WR's. Should be fun.
The Gophers better get a pass rush or I don't care how good they are.
 


So BBC and Murray could be absolutely tearing it up on the field but you won't care unless the Gophers have a pass rush?

Or he's saying it could be blanket coverage early but if they're having to cover for 5 or 6 seconds, it's highly doubtful it will remain that way
 


Or he's saying it could be blanket coverage early but if they're having to cover for 5 or 6 seconds, it's highly doubtful it will remain that way

Which is still dumb, because the Gophers didn't have much of a pass rush last year (as a whole) and the duo were still 1st team all Big 10
 

Which is still dumb, because the Gophers didn't have much of a pass rush last year (as a whole) and the duo were still 1st team all Big 10

Come on dude, you're smarter than this.

If a QB can just drop dimes all day you can have blanket coverage on a couple top flight WR and still not come up with a pass defended. Go look at the footage from the TCU game last year, Murray has blanket coverage and boinkin is dropping the ball in there, luckily the TCU guy wasn't coming up with the ball (large part thanks to good coverage) but thats a situation where the ball could easily have gone the other way.
 

Come on dude, you're smarter than this.

If a QB can just drop dimes all day you can have blanket coverage on a couple top flight WR and still not come up with a pass defended. Go look at the footage from the TCU game last year, Murray has blanket coverage and boinkin is dropping the ball in there, luckily the TCU guy wasn't coming up with the ball (large part thanks to good coverage) but thats a situation where the ball could easily have gone the other way.

Apparently not.
 

Not wanting to pile on, but if we give Boykin 5 seconds consistently, he will find someone open or be running downfield breaking down our defense.
 







Top Bottom