MaxyJR1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 11,679
- Reaction score
- 5,908
- Points
- 113
Agreed! Murray would be a first round consideration, if he had gaudier interception numbers, he's very likely an early second round pick with Brien Boddy-Calhoun a late second early third.Most only do the first round this early, so it's not surprising to see no Gophers listed.
Agreed! Murray would be a first round consideration, if he had gaudier interception numbers, he's very likely an early second round pick with Brien Boddy-Calhoun a late second early third.
My opinion right now, unless he runs a Michael carter-ish 4.7 BBC will be drafted ahead of Murray. Feel free to disagree. I reserve the right to revise this prediction
My opinion right now, unless he runs a Michael carter-ish 4.7 BBC will be drafted ahead of Murray. Feel free to disagree. I reserve the right to revise this prediction
I don't know if he'll be drafted higher, but I also thought BBC was the better corner last year.
I don't know how that's the case. BBC definitely made more big plays but Murray still locked down an entire side of the field which allowed for more coverage help there. Murray also had an excellent year against the run and really held up on that boundary. BBC played really well but (like most cbs) got beat at times. Murray was basically a shut down corner for most of the year and for the past 2 years teams have actively avoided throwing at him. Don't really know what else you want from a corner
I don't know if he'll be drafted higher, but I also thought BBC was the better corner last year.
I think NFL scouts usually prefer consistent cover guys like murray over big play ball hawking corners like BBC. A lot like Morris Clayborne vs Tyrann Mathieu at LSU. Clayborne was a top NFL pick while Mathieu got all of the college accolades and the credit for game changing plays. With a consistent cover guy, you can depend on them effectively locking up their man on 80% or more of plays while a ball hawk may only get a PBU a handful of times in a game and an INT in only a handful of times in a season.
Claiborne sucks now though
Not my point.
I'm surprised everyone here seems to think his game is complete at this point.
Just a hunch. BBC was coming off an ACL and still had an above average year. Look for him to have a monster, all Big Ten type year. He has great instincts, speed, is quick in space and yes, he makes INTs. Like it or not, turnovers are absolutely all important.
The talk about Murray started after his breakout sophomore year, but I thought he had a bit of a letdown last year. Again, just my opinion. Feel free to draw and quarter me. He could also have a monster year. I'm surprised everyone here seems to think his game is complete at this point.
That statement is not accurate. Be careful when dealing with absolutes.
However, you failed to inform us what is incomplete about "his game". I'm interested to hear you opinion.
As another astutely noticed, he was beaten more last year. There were a few games they were working on him quite a bit. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he's a bad player, just that he wasn't as great this past season, in my lowly opinion.
He might play more man vs zone than BBC does, I don't know the breakdown on number of plays but that's the usual reason given for his lack of big plays. I realize Sawvel coaches it this way, but it's also a fact there are times when it would be appropriate to track the ball. Feel free to disagree, it's a philosophy thing.
I think NFL scouts usually prefer consistent cover guys like murray over big play ball hawking corners like BBC. A lot like Morris Clayborne vs Tyrann Mathieu at LSU. Clayborne was a top NFL pick while Mathieu got all of the college accolades and the credit for game changing plays. With a consistent cover guy, you can depend on them effectively locking up their man on 80% or more of plays while a ball hawk may only get a PBU a handful of times in a game and an INT in only a handful of times in a season.
Athlons: Who are the best NFL prospects to watch in the Big Ten in 2015?
17. Theiren Cockran, DE, Minnesota (6-6, 257)
He’s rangy and versatile. He can play outside backer in a 3-4 but has excelled as a true end for Jerry Kill. Should the Florida native blossom into an All-Big Ten player, his stock could soar come draft day.
21. Eric Murray, CB, Minnesota (6-0, 196)
Murray is an incredibly productive cornerback for the Gophers. He totaled 69 tackles last fall for a team one half of football away from winning its division. All Minnesota players are well-coached and he could be the best player on the team in ’15.
http://athlonsports.com/college-football/top-25-big-ten-2016-nfl-draft-prospects-watch
Go Gophers!!
I really don't get the Cockran love. He is built like an NFL player but I don't feel like he has played like one to this point in his Gopher career. In terms of the DL last year it was the interior guys that stood out, not the ends. I am not saying he is a bad player, he's solid, but I also don't think he has been an impact defensive end to this point. Agree with the comment that in the NFL he is an outside LB in a 3-4.
He has been selected as either a Big Ten honorable mention or second team All Big Ten by both the media and coaches for two consecutive years. Cedric was neither of those by the coaches nor media in any year. Theiren was a terror when Ra'Shede was with him so hopefully an improved interior with more depth can get rid of some the the double teams that he faced last year.
As another astutely noticed, he was beaten more last year. There were a few games they were working on him quite a bit. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he's a bad player, just that he wasn't as great this past season, in my lowly opinion.
He might play more man vs zone than BBC does, I don't know the breakdown on number of plays but that's the usual reason given for his lack of big plays. I realize Sawvel coaches it this way, but it's also a fact there are times when it would be appropriate to track the ball. Feel free to disagree, it's a philosophy thing.
Ok.
Not sure why this is taken as a put down of Murray. BBC is pretty darn good as well.
This is a good argument to have! When is the last time it could be argued we have the best cb duo in the big 10.
We will soon. I hope that our next string of dbs can be as dominant.I would feel comfortable stacking those two up against pretty much and CB duo in the country, not just the Big 10. Imagine how great they could be if we had a defensive line that could consistently get to the QB and make him really uncomfortable.