2007 Team vs 2011 Team




2011 but barely. Decker and Weber are the only ones from 2007 who have even been to practice in the last couple of years. Then again, those two alone with the rest of 2007 walking in off the street might be enough to beat this team.
 

Meh - this team is in a league of their own.

Seriously - this campaign is as futile as Salem's last year. 1983...

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/minnesota/1983-schedule.html
WOW, they sure ended their season well.

9 Nov 5, 1983 Sat Minnesota (6) Illinois Big Ten L 23 50 1 8 0 L 8
10 Nov 12, 1983 Sat Minnesota (9) Michigan Big Ten L 10 58 1 9 0 L 9
11 Nov 19, 1983 Sat Minnesota @ (11) Iowa Big Ten L 10 61 1 10 0 L 10

:eek:


As for the OP, the 2007 team would win 8 times out of 10 and that's being a bit generous. That 2007 team was at least competitive in most of their games.
 



You guys realize we had a thread last year asking if the team was worse than 2007. The Gopher Hole consensus (always a model of thoughtful reason) was the 2007 team was better. It was essentially the same thread.

If this keeps up we will collectively remember the 2007 team winning the Rose Bowl.

There is a LOT of football to be played yet.
 


GH.com.

The bathroom wall of society.
 



The 2007 Team...because they were a team built for the run which was something they were able to do well in certain games. What's funny is both teams only win may very well be Miami-OH...
 





Top Bottom