FreakyDeke
picked a dumb moniker
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 1,073
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
PSU and OSU both have 1 loss and OSU lost to PSU head to head.
How does OSU get a share of BT Championship?
- Thread starter FreakyDeke
- Start date
Art Vandelay
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 4,383
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
head to head
Head to head is only used to determine the Rose Bowl invitee. The B10 recognizes teams as co-champs if they have identical records, regardless of head to head.
Head to head is only used to determine the Rose Bowl invitee. The B10 recognizes teams as co-champs if they have identical records, regardless of head to head.
Schnoodler
Ice Cream Abuser
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 6,994
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 36
that is a bit bogus though. One has proven superiority over the other. Oh well.
MNfootballfan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 2,288
- Reaction score
- 891
- Points
- 113
If Penn State wants it outright they should have beaten Iowa.
MinnMarchDTF
Musical Magician
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,546
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
Same discussion happened in 2005.
SelectionSunday
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 24,312
- Reaction score
- 4,284
- Points
- 113
A co-championship is a co-championship, no matter how you slice it. Penn State gets the Rose Bowl bid and rightly so because of head-to-head, but bottom line is the Nitts are not the outright champions. They both had the same conference record & thus both should be rewarded with a championship trophy.
Schnoodler
Ice Cream Abuser
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 6,994
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 36
That is apparently the rule, but I disagree that it should be. If we were arguing who had the hardest schedule to define who the champ should be fine, I'm all for co-champs. But there was head to head play. It's not a stretch to think that Penn should have the crown.