http://www.startribune.com/sports/g...cyaiUjc8LDyiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr
so much for improved o-line play
so much for improved o-line play
http://www.startribune.com/sports/g...cyaiUjc8LDyiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr
so much for improved o-line play
http://www.startribune.com/sports/g...cyaiUjc8LDyiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr
so much for improved o-line play
Yeah, but if he is as good as people pimped him to be (some said better than Seantrel Henderson), then he should be able to at least contribute SOMETHING to a team predicted to finish dead last by just about every media outlet.
I guess redshirting him and preserving a year of eligibility is a good idea if he's not ready and minimal plauying time this year would be a waste.
Yeah, but if he is as good as people pimped him to be (some said better than Seantrel Henderson), then he should be able to at least contribute SOMETHING to a team predicted to finish dead last by just about every media outlet.
I guess redshirting him and preserving a year of eligibility is a good idea if he's not ready and minimal plauying time this year would be a waste.
Frankly, had we landed Henderson I would have expected them to RS him too.
Huh? Are you saying the #1 recruit in the country would RS playing for a potential last place team?
I'm saying that a true freshman tackle wouldn't be the piece that saves Brew's job assuming we're a "last place team". I'm not saying Brew would have RS'd him, just that for me as a fan, I would have rather seen him get a RS. That way he'd get stronger and be a bigger force when he did play rather than tossing him out there to get worn down and beat up on by older, stronger, more experienced defenders.Huh? Are you saying the #1 recruit in the country would RS playing for a potential last place team?
he wouldn't be the first, and it really doesn't matter at this point anyway. Point is that redshirting is ideal for 99.9% of OL
If he's able to redshirt the freshmen O-Linemen, that indicates that the upperclassmen are doing OK.
Someday you'll get it.
freshmen are kids.
Seniors are men.
The more potential a kid has the more likely he is to RS.
A freshmen playing has extremely little to do with the skill of the freshman and quite a bit to do with the abilities of the upperclassmen
Playing a freshman is a fail.
http://www.startribune.com/sports/g...cyaiUjc8LDyiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr
so much for improved o-line play
do you know a guy by the name of adrian peterson? But I guess that really does not apply to gopher football since we do not recruit talent like that.
Not necessarily true. Vince young and Mike Vick were superstar All American recruits that tooka RS. Most coaches will tell you that the closer you are to the LOS the harder it is to play as a true frosh. The kid needs to get stronger like most frosh OL. Nebraska built a dynasty by redshirting OL and then pumping them up for 2 more years and starting juniors and seniors. Gjere has all the tools to be an NFL lineman (not saying he will be, just that physically he has the tools) and just needs to get stronger. You can't expect him to be able to maul 21 and 22 year old 4th and 5th year Big Ten DTs as an 18 year old freshman. Those that can do that are rare
Both may have red shirted, but they both left early proving their red shirt was pointless.
Adrian Peterson was a iineman in college? I didn't know that.
do you know a guy by the name of adrian peterson? But I guess that really does not apply to gopher football since we do not recruit talent like that.
Both may have red shirted, but they both left early proving their red shirt was pointless.
Yeah, Laurence Maroney, Marion Barber, Gary Russel were big time stiffs.
You can't compare true freshman running backs to offensive lineman. If you are, you are more dense than I thought. How about you count the amount of true freshman OL in the two deeps in all the big 10.
From the time a person's high school class graduate his clock is ticking. Three years later he can go pro. Will he? Depends on many factors. But, he can. This fact changes the old ideas on red shirting. In a sense it is more "use him or lose him" if the young man is an NFL talent in less than five years.
Here is an idea, instead of name calling why don't you provide an actual reasoning behind your argument? Just a thought.
That makes no sense. Redshirting happens when a coach thinks a player will benefit from an extra year of strength training and/or time to learn the playbook/position. Coaches aren't fortune tellers and even if they were, are you suggesting coaches should put players on the field before they thing they are ready because they might leave early for the NFL if they prove to be good enough?
Here is an idea, instead of name calling why don't you provide an actual reasoning behind your argument? Just a thought.
If he's able to redshirt the freshmen O-Linemen, that indicates that the upperclassmen are doing OK.